Identification of movement artefact by the Nellcor N-200 and N-3000 pulse oximeters.

J L Plummer, A H Ilsley, R R Fronsko, H Owen
{"title":"Identification of movement artefact by the Nellcor N-200 and N-3000 pulse oximeters.","authors":"J L Plummer,&nbsp;A H Ilsley,&nbsp;R R Fronsko,&nbsp;H Owen","doi":"10.1023/a:1007303104811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Nellcor N-3000 pulse oximeter is designed to be able to identify signal artefact related to movement of the body part to which the probe is attached. It may therefore provide a reliable means of monitoring arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2) in awake, moving patients. This study compared the Nellcor N-3000 and N-200 pulse oximeters in terms of their ability to identify readings associated with movement, in a group of volunteers making standardized movements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six volunteers were studied. Volunteers breathed room air throughout the study. SpO2 of each volunteer was monitored by both a Nellcor N-200 and a Nellcor N-3000 simultaneously on both hands. Volunteers made a series of five standardized movements, each lasting one minute, with each hand during the monitoring session, while SpO2 and oximeter status were recorded from all four oximeters. The mean SpO2 reading was calculated during each movement. SpO2 readings which the oximeter identified as being associated with movement, pulse search not locked, sensor not attached, or break in communications were excluded from analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The N-3000 rejected from 17 to 78% of readings taken during movement, compared to 0 to 2% with the N-200. Although the remaining readings of both types of oximeters were subject to some movement artefact, which led to spuriously low SpO2, this was significantly less with the N-3000.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Nellcor N-3000 pulse oximeter is able, to some extent, to identify movement artefact. It should offer an advantage over the N-200 when monitoring moving patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical monitoring","volume":"13 2","pages":"109-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1007303104811","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007303104811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objectives: The Nellcor N-3000 pulse oximeter is designed to be able to identify signal artefact related to movement of the body part to which the probe is attached. It may therefore provide a reliable means of monitoring arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2) in awake, moving patients. This study compared the Nellcor N-3000 and N-200 pulse oximeters in terms of their ability to identify readings associated with movement, in a group of volunteers making standardized movements.

Methods: Thirty-six volunteers were studied. Volunteers breathed room air throughout the study. SpO2 of each volunteer was monitored by both a Nellcor N-200 and a Nellcor N-3000 simultaneously on both hands. Volunteers made a series of five standardized movements, each lasting one minute, with each hand during the monitoring session, while SpO2 and oximeter status were recorded from all four oximeters. The mean SpO2 reading was calculated during each movement. SpO2 readings which the oximeter identified as being associated with movement, pulse search not locked, sensor not attached, or break in communications were excluded from analysis.

Results: The N-3000 rejected from 17 to 78% of readings taken during movement, compared to 0 to 2% with the N-200. Although the remaining readings of both types of oximeters were subject to some movement artefact, which led to spuriously low SpO2, this was significantly less with the N-3000.

Conclusions: The Nellcor N-3000 pulse oximeter is able, to some extent, to identify movement artefact. It should offer an advantage over the N-200 when monitoring moving patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用Nellcor N-200和N-3000脉搏血氧仪识别运动伪影。
目的:Nellcor N-3000脉搏血氧仪旨在能够识别与探头所连接的身体部位运动相关的信号伪影。因此,它可以提供一种可靠的方法来监测醒着、活动的患者的动脉氧合血红蛋白饱和度(SpO2)。这项研究比较了Nellcor N-3000和N-200脉搏血氧仪在一组进行标准化运动的志愿者中识别与运动相关读数的能力。方法:对36名志愿者进行研究。志愿者在整个研究过程中呼吸室内空气。每位志愿者的SpO2由Nellcor N-200和Nellcor N-3000同时监测。在监测过程中,志愿者每只手做5个标准化的动作,每次持续1分钟,同时记录4个血氧仪的血氧饱和度和血氧饱和度。计算每次运动时SpO2平均值。血氧计识别为与运动、脉搏搜索未锁定、传感器未连接或通信中断相关的SpO2读数被排除在分析之外。结果:N-3000在运动过程中拒绝了17%到78%的读数,而N-200拒绝了0%到2%。尽管这两种类型的血氧仪的剩余读数都受到一些运动伪影的影响,这导致了虚假的低SpO2,但N-3000的情况明显更少。结论:Nellcor N-3000脉搏血氧仪在一定程度上能够识别运动伪影。在监测移动患者时,它应该比N-200有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thanks to reviewers Pulse oximetry. Abstracts of scientific papers third international symposium on computing in anesthesia Abstracts of scientific papers computers in anesthesia VI Monitoring in Anesthesia, Second Edition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1