Determinants of primate social organization: comparative evidence and new insights from Malagasy lemurs.

P M Kappeler
{"title":"Determinants of primate social organization: comparative evidence and new insights from Malagasy lemurs.","authors":"P M Kappeler","doi":"10.1017/s0006323196004999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this review is to summarize newly available information on lemur social systems, to contrast it with the social organization of other primates and to relate it to existing models of primate social evolution. Because of their evolutionary history, the primates of Madagascar constitute a natural experiment in social evolution. During millions of years of isolation, they converged with other primates only in the most fundamental way in the evolution of solitary, pair-living and group-living species, but deviate in several respects within these basic categories of social organization. Solitary lemurs remain poorly studied, but their social organization appears to be broadly similar to that of other solitary primates, even though the unexpected lack of sexual dimorphism may indicate that similar types of social organization can give rise to different mating systems. The determinants of a solitary lifestyle remain elusive. Pair-living lemurs show striking convergences with other monogamous primates in several behavioural traits, but also deviate in that the majority of species are at least partly nocturnal and do not exhibit direct paternal care of dependent young. Group-living lemurs have not evolved single-male groups, male-bonded and multi-level societies, and polyandrous groups may also be lacking. Female philopatry is common, but female bonds are generally weakly developed and eviction of females from natal groups is not unusual. Group-living lemurs also differ from anthropoids in that their groups have even adult sex ratios, smaller average size and may split up on a seasonal basis. Feeding competition, predation risk and reproductive competition can not fully explain these unusual aspects of lemur social organization. It has therefore been suggested that the social consequences of the risk of infanticide and of recent changes in activity may be ultimately responsible for these idiosyncracies of group-living lemurs, an explanation largely supported by the available evidence. Thus, social factors and fundamental life-history traits, in addition to ecological factors, contribute importantly to variation in social systems among lemurs, and possibly other primates. However, neither the diversity of lemur social systems, nor the evolutionary forces and mechanisms operating in these and other primates are yet fully understood.</p>","PeriodicalId":8893,"journal":{"name":"Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s0006323196004999","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0006323196004999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this review is to summarize newly available information on lemur social systems, to contrast it with the social organization of other primates and to relate it to existing models of primate social evolution. Because of their evolutionary history, the primates of Madagascar constitute a natural experiment in social evolution. During millions of years of isolation, they converged with other primates only in the most fundamental way in the evolution of solitary, pair-living and group-living species, but deviate in several respects within these basic categories of social organization. Solitary lemurs remain poorly studied, but their social organization appears to be broadly similar to that of other solitary primates, even though the unexpected lack of sexual dimorphism may indicate that similar types of social organization can give rise to different mating systems. The determinants of a solitary lifestyle remain elusive. Pair-living lemurs show striking convergences with other monogamous primates in several behavioural traits, but also deviate in that the majority of species are at least partly nocturnal and do not exhibit direct paternal care of dependent young. Group-living lemurs have not evolved single-male groups, male-bonded and multi-level societies, and polyandrous groups may also be lacking. Female philopatry is common, but female bonds are generally weakly developed and eviction of females from natal groups is not unusual. Group-living lemurs also differ from anthropoids in that their groups have even adult sex ratios, smaller average size and may split up on a seasonal basis. Feeding competition, predation risk and reproductive competition can not fully explain these unusual aspects of lemur social organization. It has therefore been suggested that the social consequences of the risk of infanticide and of recent changes in activity may be ultimately responsible for these idiosyncracies of group-living lemurs, an explanation largely supported by the available evidence. Thus, social factors and fundamental life-history traits, in addition to ecological factors, contribute importantly to variation in social systems among lemurs, and possibly other primates. However, neither the diversity of lemur social systems, nor the evolutionary forces and mechanisms operating in these and other primates are yet fully understood.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灵长类社会组织的决定因素:来自马达加斯加狐猴的比较证据和新见解。
本文综述了狐猴社会系统的最新研究成果,并将其与其他灵长类动物的社会组织进行了比较,并将其与现有的灵长类动物社会进化模型联系起来。由于它们的进化史,马达加斯加的灵长类动物构成了社会进化的自然实验。在数百万年的孤立生活中,它们与其他灵长类动物只是在独居、成对生活和群体生活的进化过程中以最基本的方式趋同,但在这些社会组织的基本类别中,它们在几个方面有所偏离。独居狐猴的研究仍然很少,但它们的社会组织似乎与其他独居灵长类动物大致相似,尽管性别二态性的意外缺乏可能表明类似类型的社会组织可以产生不同的交配系统。独居生活方式的决定因素仍然难以捉摸。成对生活的狐猴在一些行为特征上与其他一夫一妻制灵长类动物表现出惊人的趋同,但在大多数物种至少部分是夜行性的,并且不表现出对依赖后代的直接父亲照顾方面也有所不同。群居狐猴没有进化成单雄性群体、雄性结合群体和多层次社会,也可能缺乏一妻多夫群体。雌性的亲缘关系很常见,但雌性之间的联系通常很弱,从出生群体中驱逐雌性并不罕见。群居狐猴与类人猿的不同之处在于,它们的群体性别比例均匀,平均体型较小,可能会根据季节分裂。觅食竞争、捕食风险和繁殖竞争并不能完全解释狐猴社会组织的这些不寻常方面。因此,有人提出,杀婴风险和最近活动变化的社会后果可能是导致群居狐猴这些特质的最终原因,这一解释在很大程度上得到了现有证据的支持。因此,除了生态因素外,社会因素和基本生活史特征对狐猴和其他灵长类动物之间社会系统的变化起着重要作用。然而,无论是狐猴社会系统的多样性,还是狐猴和其他灵长类动物的进化力量和机制,都还没有得到充分的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The diet of early birds based on modern and fossil evidence and a new framework for its reconstruction Biological Invasion Theories: Merging Perspectives from Population, Community and Ecosystem Scales Consistent trade‐offs in ecosystem services between land covers with different production intensities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1