Comparison of commercially available antibody reagents for the cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia assay

Kirsten St.George, Charles R. Rinaldo Jr.
{"title":"Comparison of commercially available antibody reagents for the cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia assay","authors":"Kirsten St.George,&nbsp;Charles R. Rinaldo Jr.","doi":"10.1016/S0928-0197(96)00264-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> The Argene Biosoft 1C3 and the Biotest C10,C11 monoclonal antibodies are two of the most commonly used commercially available antibody reagents for the cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia assay.</p><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> The sensitivities of these two reagents were compared in peripheral blood specimens received for CMV antigenemia testing.</p><p><strong>Study design:</strong> A total of 1149 peripheral blood specimens were processed for CMV antigenemia testing. Duplicate slides were stained with the Biosoft 1C3 and Biotest C10,C11 monoclonal antibodies.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 158 specimens gave a positive result by one or both antibodies. One hundred and forty five were positive by the Biosoft antibody and 130 were positive by the Biotest antibody. Positive cell counts were significantly higher on cell preparations stained by the Biosoft antibody (Wilcoxon signed rank, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and the Biosoft antibody detected twice as many low-level positive specimens as the Biotest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The Biosoft antibody reagent was superior to the Biotest reagent for the detection of CMV antigenemia. This is an important factor since early detection is essential for appropriate initiation of preemptive antiviral therapy, particularly in transplant recipients at high risk of CMV disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79479,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and diagnostic virology","volume":"7 3","pages":"Pages 147-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0928-0197(96)00264-4","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and diagnostic virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928019796002644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: The Argene Biosoft 1C3 and the Biotest C10,C11 monoclonal antibodies are two of the most commonly used commercially available antibody reagents for the cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia assay.

Objectives: The sensitivities of these two reagents were compared in peripheral blood specimens received for CMV antigenemia testing.

Study design: A total of 1149 peripheral blood specimens were processed for CMV antigenemia testing. Duplicate slides were stained with the Biosoft 1C3 and Biotest C10,C11 monoclonal antibodies.

Results: A total of 158 specimens gave a positive result by one or both antibodies. One hundred and forty five were positive by the Biosoft antibody and 130 were positive by the Biotest antibody. Positive cell counts were significantly higher on cell preparations stained by the Biosoft antibody (Wilcoxon signed rank, P < 0.001) and the Biosoft antibody detected twice as many low-level positive specimens as the Biotest.

Conclusions: The Biosoft antibody reagent was superior to the Biotest reagent for the detection of CMV antigenemia. This is an important factor since early detection is essential for appropriate initiation of preemptive antiviral therapy, particularly in transplant recipients at high risk of CMV disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市售巨细胞病毒pp65抗原血症测定抗体试剂的比较
背景:Argene Biosoft 1C3和Biotest C10、C11单克隆抗体是巨细胞病毒(CMV) pp65抗原血症检测中最常用的两种市售抗体试剂。目的:比较两种试剂对CMV抗原血症检测外周血标本的敏感性。研究设计:对1149例外周血标本进行巨细胞病毒抗原血症检测。用Biosoft 1C3和Biotest C10、C11单克隆抗体对重复的载玻片进行染色。结果:158例标本单抗体或双抗体阳性。145例Biosoft抗体阳性,130例Biotest抗体阳性。经Biosoft抗体染色的细胞制剂阳性细胞数显著增加(Wilcoxon signed rank, P <0.001), Biosoft抗体检测到的低水平阳性标本是Biotest的两倍。结论:Biosoft抗体试剂检测巨细胞病毒抗原血症优于Biotest试剂。这是一个重要的因素,因为早期发现对于适当开始先发制人的抗病毒治疗至关重要,特别是在巨细胞病毒疾病高风险的移植受者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Immune mediated and inherited defences against flaviviruses Maternal recognition of foetal infection with bovine virus diarrhoea virus (BVDV)—the bovine pestivirus The conformation of hepatitis C virus NS3 proteinase with and without NS4A: a structural basis for the activation of the enzyme by its cofactor Repression of the PKR protein kinase by the hepatitis C virus NS5A protein: a potential mechanism of interferon resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1