Richard A. Greene , Anthony J. Japour , Frank Brewster , Richard A. Joseph , Pei H. Chung , Patricia A. Kasila , Pamela A. Chatis
{"title":"Determination of HIV-1 susceptibility to reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors by a quantitative cell-free RT assay","authors":"Richard A. Greene , Anthony J. Japour , Frank Brewster , Richard A. Joseph , Pei H. Chung , Patricia A. Kasila , Pamela A. Chatis","doi":"10.1016/S0928-0197(96)00259-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) gene confer resistance to antiviral drugs acting on RT. Current methods employed to detect such resistance require time-consuming culture techniques during which selective pressures may affect the outcome of the test.</p><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> We sought to determine whether drug-susceptible and drug-resistant HIV-1 derived from clinical specimens could be distinguished by the effects of the active form of the drug on the enzyme activity in a quantitative, cell-free RT assay.</p><p><strong>Study design:</strong> Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-precipitated virus was obtained from 7-day culture supernatants. RT activity in the lysed viral extracts was measured in the presence of increasing concentrations of the active form of the drug being tested. IC<sub>50</sub> (50% inhibitory concentration) values were determined by application of the median effect equation.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Assays from nine post-nevirapine therapy isolates gave IC<sub>50</sub> values at least 2 logs greater than pre-nevirapine isolates. The method also correctly distinguished between isolates sensitive and resistant to 2′,3′-dideoxyinosine (ddI), but not between the ZDV-sensitive and ZDV-resistant isolates tested. The results agreed with data obtained by sequencing and by culture-based susceptibility assays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> This technique appears to offer a simple, rapid method for determining the resistance of HIV-1 isolates to nevirapine, ddI and possibly other RT-inhibiting drugs. The method is not useful for identifying resistance to ZDV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79479,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and diagnostic virology","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 111-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0928-0197(96)00259-0","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and diagnostic virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928019796002590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Background: Mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) gene confer resistance to antiviral drugs acting on RT. Current methods employed to detect such resistance require time-consuming culture techniques during which selective pressures may affect the outcome of the test.
Objectives: We sought to determine whether drug-susceptible and drug-resistant HIV-1 derived from clinical specimens could be distinguished by the effects of the active form of the drug on the enzyme activity in a quantitative, cell-free RT assay.
Study design: Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-precipitated virus was obtained from 7-day culture supernatants. RT activity in the lysed viral extracts was measured in the presence of increasing concentrations of the active form of the drug being tested. IC50 (50% inhibitory concentration) values were determined by application of the median effect equation.
Results: Assays from nine post-nevirapine therapy isolates gave IC50 values at least 2 logs greater than pre-nevirapine isolates. The method also correctly distinguished between isolates sensitive and resistant to 2′,3′-dideoxyinosine (ddI), but not between the ZDV-sensitive and ZDV-resistant isolates tested. The results agreed with data obtained by sequencing and by culture-based susceptibility assays.
Conclusions: This technique appears to offer a simple, rapid method for determining the resistance of HIV-1 isolates to nevirapine, ddI and possibly other RT-inhibiting drugs. The method is not useful for identifying resistance to ZDV.