Skin dose from radiotherapy X-ray beams: the influence of energy.

Australasian radiology Pub Date : 1997-05-01
M J Butson, J N Mathur, P E Metcalfe
{"title":"Skin dose from radiotherapy X-ray beams: the influence of energy.","authors":"M J Butson,&nbsp;J N Mathur,&nbsp;P E Metcalfe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skin-sparing properties of megavoltage photon beams are compromised by electron contamination. Higher energy beams do not necessarily produce lower surface and basal cell layer doses due to this electron contamination. For a 5 x 5 cm field size the surface doses for 6 MVp and 18 MVp X-ray beams are 10% and 7% of their respective maxima. However, at a field size of 40 x 40 cm the percentage surface dose is 42% for both 6 MVp and 18 MVp beams. The introduction of beam modifying devices such block trays can further reduce the skin-sparing advantages of high energy photon beams. Using a 10 mm perspex block tray, the surface doses for 6 MVp and 18 MVp beams with a 5 x 5 cm field size are 10% and 8%, respectively. At 40 x 40 cm, surface doses are 61% and 63% for 6 MVp and 18 MVp beams, respectively. This trend is followed at the basal cell layer depth. At a depth of 1 mm, 18 MVp beam doses are always at least 5% smaller than 6 MVp doses for the same depth at all field sizes when normalized to their respective Dmax values. Results have shown that higher energy photon beams produce a negligible reduction of the delivered dose to the basal cell layer (0.1 mm). Only a small increase in skin sparing is seen at the dermal layer (1 mm), which can be negated by the increased exit dose from an opposing field.</p>","PeriodicalId":75572,"journal":{"name":"Australasian radiology","volume":"41 2","pages":"148-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skin-sparing properties of megavoltage photon beams are compromised by electron contamination. Higher energy beams do not necessarily produce lower surface and basal cell layer doses due to this electron contamination. For a 5 x 5 cm field size the surface doses for 6 MVp and 18 MVp X-ray beams are 10% and 7% of their respective maxima. However, at a field size of 40 x 40 cm the percentage surface dose is 42% for both 6 MVp and 18 MVp beams. The introduction of beam modifying devices such block trays can further reduce the skin-sparing advantages of high energy photon beams. Using a 10 mm perspex block tray, the surface doses for 6 MVp and 18 MVp beams with a 5 x 5 cm field size are 10% and 8%, respectively. At 40 x 40 cm, surface doses are 61% and 63% for 6 MVp and 18 MVp beams, respectively. This trend is followed at the basal cell layer depth. At a depth of 1 mm, 18 MVp beam doses are always at least 5% smaller than 6 MVp doses for the same depth at all field sizes when normalized to their respective Dmax values. Results have shown that higher energy photon beams produce a negligible reduction of the delivered dose to the basal cell layer (0.1 mm). Only a small increase in skin sparing is seen at the dermal layer (1 mm), which can be negated by the increased exit dose from an opposing field.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射治疗x射线的皮肤剂量:能量的影响。
巨压光子光束的保肤特性受到电子污染的损害。由于这种电子污染,高能束不一定产生较低的表面和基底细胞层剂量。对于5 × 5 cm的场尺寸,6 MVp和18 MVp x射线束的表面剂量分别为其各自最大剂量的10%和7%。然而,在场尺寸为40 x 40 cm时,6 MVp和18 MVp光束的表面剂量百分比均为42%。引入诸如块盘之类的光束修饰装置可以进一步降低高能光子光束的保肤优势。使用10毫米有机玻璃块托盘,5 × 5厘米场尺寸的6个MVp和18个MVp光束的表面剂量分别为10%和8%。在40 × 40 cm处,6束MVp和18束MVp的表面剂量分别为61%和63%。这种趋势在基底细胞层深度处也有体现。当归一化到各自的Dmax值时,在1 mm的深度下,18 MVp光束剂量总是比相同深度下的6 MVp剂量至少小5%。结果表明,更高能量的光子束产生可忽略不计的减少交付剂量的基底细胞层(0.1毫米)。在真皮层(1毫米)只观察到皮肤保留的少量增加,这可以被相反场的出口剂量增加所抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adrenal myelolipoma. Meningioangiomatosis What happens after a lung scan? Management and outcome of patients in a regional hospital. New patient per radiation oncologist annual workload: comment. Radiotherapy utilization: reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1