[Cerebral cognitive deficits in the aged. Diagnostic and therapeutic standards: organization of strategies for problem detection and solution].

G Stoppe, H Sandholzer, J Staedt
{"title":"[Cerebral cognitive deficits in the aged. Diagnostic and therapeutic standards: organization of strategies for problem detection and solution].","authors":"G Stoppe,&nbsp;H Sandholzer,&nbsp;J Staedt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper reports the results of a representative survey which was performed in cooperation with 145 family physicians and 14 primary care neuropsychiatrists (response rate 83.2%) in the area of Göttingen, Germany. With the use of a standardised interview referring to written sample case histories, we investigated the diagnostic and therapeutic management of memory disturbances in old age. The results showed, that dementia and depression are underdiagnosed in primary care, and that memory disturbances are mainly regarded as consequences of disturbed cerebrovascular perfusion. About 70% of all physicians would prescribe a cognition enhancer, however about a third of them would do it in spite of major doubts about their efficacy. The results underline the necessity of continuing education especially with regard to early diagnosis of dementive and affective disorders in later life. The development of therapeutic standards in this area should take \"irrational\" motives into account. Appropriate exemplary case histories seem to be a potentially useful tool for the measurement of physicians' competence and its changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a representative survey which was performed in cooperation with 145 family physicians and 14 primary care neuropsychiatrists (response rate 83.2%) in the area of Göttingen, Germany. With the use of a standardised interview referring to written sample case histories, we investigated the diagnostic and therapeutic management of memory disturbances in old age. The results showed, that dementia and depression are underdiagnosed in primary care, and that memory disturbances are mainly regarded as consequences of disturbed cerebrovascular perfusion. About 70% of all physicians would prescribe a cognition enhancer, however about a third of them would do it in spite of major doubts about their efficacy. The results underline the necessity of continuing education especially with regard to early diagnosis of dementive and affective disorders in later life. The development of therapeutic standards in this area should take "irrational" motives into account. Appropriate exemplary case histories seem to be a potentially useful tool for the measurement of physicians' competence and its changes.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人的大脑认知缺陷。诊断和治疗标准:问题发现和解决策略的组织]。
本文报告了在德国Göttingen地区与145名家庭医生和14名初级保健神经精神科医生(有效率83.2%)合作进行的一项代表性调查的结果。使用标准化访谈参考书面样本病例史,我们调查了老年记忆障碍的诊断和治疗管理。结果显示,在初级保健中,痴呆和抑郁症的诊断不足,记忆障碍主要被认为是脑血管灌注紊乱的后果。大约70%的医生会开认知增强剂的处方,然而,尽管对其功效有很大的怀疑,但仍有大约三分之一的医生会这样做。结果强调了继续教育的必要性,特别是在老年痴呆和情感障碍的早期诊断方面。该领域治疗标准的制定应考虑到“非理性”动机。适当的范例病历似乎是衡量医生能力及其变化的潜在有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Transfusion-hemosiderosis]. [Retroperitoneal fibrosis]. [Abdominal pain]. [Healthy life style. Perspectives of prevention in modern society]. [General practice quality circles in the large city. Participation by Hamburg general physicians].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1