{"title":"Increased risk in esophageal obstruction with slow-release medications.","authors":"V Simko, D Joseph, S Michael","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although medication-induced (pill) esophagitis has been recognized for a long time, little data are available on the risk of recently introduced slow-release medications. These formulations may have an obstructive capability (undissolved medication blocking an obstructed lumen) or may cause tissue irritation (continuous leakage from a slowly disintegrating pill). We observed a patient with esophageal carcinoma who developed complete obstruction when three Procardia XL (nifedipine) extended-release tablets blocked the narrowed lumen. An intact Procardia XL tablet and a washed shell as a control were implanted subcutaneously in a rat. The intact pill produced a large inflammatory mass: in contrast, no inflammatory response was noted at the control site implanted with a washed shell. In vitro testing of seven different slow-release medications revealed a wide difference in their solubility at a neutral pH and in gastric juice of pH 1.8 (simulation of esophageal or gastric environment). Theolair-SR (anhydrous theophylline, sustained-release) tablets had the highest obstructive, but no irritating potential. Cardizem SR (diltiazem hydrochloride) sustained-release capsules dissolved promptly without obstructive potential. Adalat CC (nifedipine) extended-release tablets also dissolved early at both pH values. Cardizem CD (diltiazem hydrochloride) extended-release capsules and Calan SR (verapamil hydrochloride) sustained-release oral caplets disintegrated into granules that had a low obstructive potential, but their prolonged presence increased the risk of tissue irritation. Ecotrin (enteric-coated aspirin) tablets had a high obstructive and no irritating potential in the first 24 hours, after which they disintegrated and directly contacted the tissue. Procardia XL extended-release tablets had an insoluble shell that continued to leak a tissue-irritating content even after 48 hours, generating a prolonged obstructive and irritating condition. In conclusion, slow-release medications greatly increase the risk of esophageal injury. Their obstructive and tissue-irritating potentials differ widely. Slow-release formulations should be contraindicated in patients who have obstructive esophageal and gastric disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":77227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians : the official publication of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians : the official publication of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although medication-induced (pill) esophagitis has been recognized for a long time, little data are available on the risk of recently introduced slow-release medications. These formulations may have an obstructive capability (undissolved medication blocking an obstructed lumen) or may cause tissue irritation (continuous leakage from a slowly disintegrating pill). We observed a patient with esophageal carcinoma who developed complete obstruction when three Procardia XL (nifedipine) extended-release tablets blocked the narrowed lumen. An intact Procardia XL tablet and a washed shell as a control were implanted subcutaneously in a rat. The intact pill produced a large inflammatory mass: in contrast, no inflammatory response was noted at the control site implanted with a washed shell. In vitro testing of seven different slow-release medications revealed a wide difference in their solubility at a neutral pH and in gastric juice of pH 1.8 (simulation of esophageal or gastric environment). Theolair-SR (anhydrous theophylline, sustained-release) tablets had the highest obstructive, but no irritating potential. Cardizem SR (diltiazem hydrochloride) sustained-release capsules dissolved promptly without obstructive potential. Adalat CC (nifedipine) extended-release tablets also dissolved early at both pH values. Cardizem CD (diltiazem hydrochloride) extended-release capsules and Calan SR (verapamil hydrochloride) sustained-release oral caplets disintegrated into granules that had a low obstructive potential, but their prolonged presence increased the risk of tissue irritation. Ecotrin (enteric-coated aspirin) tablets had a high obstructive and no irritating potential in the first 24 hours, after which they disintegrated and directly contacted the tissue. Procardia XL extended-release tablets had an insoluble shell that continued to leak a tissue-irritating content even after 48 hours, generating a prolonged obstructive and irritating condition. In conclusion, slow-release medications greatly increase the risk of esophageal injury. Their obstructive and tissue-irritating potentials differ widely. Slow-release formulations should be contraindicated in patients who have obstructive esophageal and gastric disorders.