Predicting surgical outcome for pain relief and return to work.

C Hamlin, M Hitchcock, J Hofmeister, R Owens
{"title":"Predicting surgical outcome for pain relief and return to work.","authors":"C Hamlin,&nbsp;M Hitchcock,&nbsp;J Hofmeister,&nbsp;R Owens","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated a new psychological test (Paindex) for identifying and quantifying psychological factors associated with poor surgical outcome, and predicting the degree of pain relief and return to work.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This test was administered to 120 randomly selected patients before carpal tunnel and laminectomy surgeries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This test correctly predicted the probability of pain relief and return to work in 46 of the 50 laminectomy patients (92%), and 63 of the 70 carpal tunnel patients (90%). The overall test sensitivity was 86% and the specificity 94%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that this can be a useful adjunctive test for identifying psychological problems that could have a bearing on the decision to operate and then problems that could occur after surgery, particularly in cases where the extent and degree of pain and disability are judged to be considerably in excess of the objective medical findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":79476,"journal":{"name":"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application","volume":"1 6","pages":"311-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We evaluated a new psychological test (Paindex) for identifying and quantifying psychological factors associated with poor surgical outcome, and predicting the degree of pain relief and return to work.

Method: This test was administered to 120 randomly selected patients before carpal tunnel and laminectomy surgeries.

Results: This test correctly predicted the probability of pain relief and return to work in 46 of the 50 laminectomy patients (92%), and 63 of the 70 carpal tunnel patients (90%). The overall test sensitivity was 86% and the specificity 94%.

Conclusion: These findings indicate that this can be a useful adjunctive test for identifying psychological problems that could have a bearing on the decision to operate and then problems that could occur after surgery, particularly in cases where the extent and degree of pain and disability are judged to be considerably in excess of the objective medical findings.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测手术结果以缓解疼痛和重返工作岗位。
背景:我们评估了一种新的心理测试(Paindex),用于识别和量化与不良手术结果相关的心理因素,并预测疼痛缓解程度和重返工作岗位。方法:随机选取120例腕管及椎板切除术前患者进行试验。结果:该测试正确预测了50例椎板切除术患者中的46例(92%)和70例腕管患者中的63例(90%)疼痛缓解和重返工作岗位的可能性。总检测灵敏度为86%,特异度为94%。结论:这些发现表明,这可以是一种有用的辅助测试,用于识别可能影响手术决定的心理问题,然后是手术后可能发生的问题,特别是在判断疼痛和残疾的程度和程度大大超过客观医学结果的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring patient satisfaction in healthcare organizations: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Clinical risk modification, quality, and patient safety: interrelationships, problems, and future potential. Disease management: Lovelace Health Systems episodes of care--a case study. Technology assessment in healthcare: a review and description of a "best practice" technology assessment process. Academic health center teaching hospitals in transition: a perspective from the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1