Lupus and nonlupus membranous glomerulopathy. Quantitative comparison of the subepithelial deposits and glomerular basement membrane including clinicomorphologic correlations.

General & diagnostic pathology Pub Date : 1997-06-01
M Danilewicz, M Wagrowska-Danilewicz
{"title":"Lupus and nonlupus membranous glomerulopathy. Quantitative comparison of the subepithelial deposits and glomerular basement membrane including clinicomorphologic correlations.","authors":"M Danilewicz,&nbsp;M Wagrowska-Danilewicz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined quantitatively 11 renal biopsy specimens from patients with class Va WHO lupus membranous glomerulopathy (LMGN) and 16 from patients with primary (nonlupus) membranous glomerulopathy (NLMGN) for whom both light and electron microscopy as well as immunofluorescence microscopy and full clinical data were available and compared these specimens with six cases of normal controls. In LMGN, subepithelial deposits resembled those seen in stage III of membranous glomerulopathy (MGN) according to the scheme proposed by Churg's group, i.e., for the present study only advanced cases of NLMGN (stage III according to this scheme) were selected. The electron micrographs were scanned in Primax flatbed A4 scanner and morphometric investigations were then performed by means of a computer image analysis system to compare glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickness and the electron-microscopic density of the deposits in LMGN and NLMGN as well as to study whether these parameters could correlate with the clinical data. The study revealed that in LMGN the GBM thickness and the electron-microscopic density of the deposits were significantly increased in comparison with NLMGN. It should also be noted that both in LMGN and NLMGN groups the degree of proteinuria was closely correlated with the density of the deposits, but not with the GBM thickness. Moreover, no correlations were found between serum creatinine and the GBM thickness as well as between serum creatinine and the density of the deposits in these groups. In conclusion, the present data confirm that in LMGN and NLMGN proteinuria mainly depends on density of the subepithelial deposits. Furthermore, in cases with especially high density of these deposits systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) should be taken into consideration, even if this etiology was not clinically suggested at the time of biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":79430,"journal":{"name":"General & diagnostic pathology","volume":"142 5-6","pages":"305-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General & diagnostic pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined quantitatively 11 renal biopsy specimens from patients with class Va WHO lupus membranous glomerulopathy (LMGN) and 16 from patients with primary (nonlupus) membranous glomerulopathy (NLMGN) for whom both light and electron microscopy as well as immunofluorescence microscopy and full clinical data were available and compared these specimens with six cases of normal controls. In LMGN, subepithelial deposits resembled those seen in stage III of membranous glomerulopathy (MGN) according to the scheme proposed by Churg's group, i.e., for the present study only advanced cases of NLMGN (stage III according to this scheme) were selected. The electron micrographs were scanned in Primax flatbed A4 scanner and morphometric investigations were then performed by means of a computer image analysis system to compare glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickness and the electron-microscopic density of the deposits in LMGN and NLMGN as well as to study whether these parameters could correlate with the clinical data. The study revealed that in LMGN the GBM thickness and the electron-microscopic density of the deposits were significantly increased in comparison with NLMGN. It should also be noted that both in LMGN and NLMGN groups the degree of proteinuria was closely correlated with the density of the deposits, but not with the GBM thickness. Moreover, no correlations were found between serum creatinine and the GBM thickness as well as between serum creatinine and the density of the deposits in these groups. In conclusion, the present data confirm that in LMGN and NLMGN proteinuria mainly depends on density of the subepithelial deposits. Furthermore, in cases with especially high density of these deposits systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) should be taken into consideration, even if this etiology was not clinically suggested at the time of biopsy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
狼疮和非狼疮膜性肾小球病。上皮下沉积与肾小球基底膜的定量比较及临床形态学相关性。
我们定量检查了11例WHO狼疮膜性肾小球病变(LMGN)患者的肾活检标本和16例原发性(非狼疮)膜性肾小球病变(NLMGN)患者的肾活检标本,其中光镜和电子显微镜以及免疫荧光显微镜和完整的临床数据可用,并将这些标本与6例正常对照进行了比较。在LMGN中,根据Churg小组提出的方案,上皮下沉积与膜性肾小球病(MGN) III期相似,即本研究仅选择晚期NLMGN病例(根据该方案III期)。在Primax平板A4扫描仪上扫描电镜,然后通过计算机图像分析系统进行形态测量,比较肾小球基底膜(GBM)厚度和LMGN和NLMGN沉积物的电镜密度,并研究这些参数是否与临床数据相关。研究表明,与NLMGN相比,LMGN中沉积的GBM厚度和电子显微镜密度显著增加。值得注意的是,在LMGN和NLMGN组中,蛋白尿程度与沉积物密度密切相关,而与GBM厚度无关。此外,血清肌酐与GBM厚度之间以及血清肌酐与沉积物密度之间没有相关性。总之,目前的数据证实,在NLMGN和NLMGN中,蛋白尿主要取决于上皮下沉积物的密度。此外,在这些沉积物密度特别高的情况下,应该考虑系统性红斑狼疮(SLE),即使在活检时临床上没有提出这种病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Osseous manifestation of Rosai-Dorfman disease (sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy). A case report and review of the literature. Proliferative activity, p53 accumulation and neoangiogenesis in pulmonary carcinosarcomas and pulmonary blastomas. Human vaginal mucosal immune system: characterization and function. Prognostic assessment of histologic parameters in breast carcinomas: a prospective study. Chronic nonspecific endometritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1