Codeine, Cough and Upper Respiratory Infection

Ronald Eccles
{"title":"Codeine, Cough and Upper Respiratory Infection","authors":"Ronald Eccles","doi":"10.1006/pulp.1996.0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Codeine is generally accepted as a standard or reference antitussive against which new antitussive medications can be compared. However there are very few studies which have investigated the antitussive efficacy of codeine using cough associated with upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and there is little if any evidence to support the antitussive efficacy of codeine in this model. This paper discusses the mechanism of cough in man and describes some clinical investigations on the effects of codeine on cough associated with URTI. The recent clinical investigations do not provide any evidence to support an antitussive action of codeine in the treatment of cough associated with URTI yet there is evidence in the literature which indicates that codeine inhibits fictive cough in animal models and also has antitussive activity against both induced and chronic cough models in man. In order to explain these different effects of codeine on the different models of cough, a hypothesis is put forward that there are two cough pathways in man. A voluntary pathway associated with cough related to URTI which is not affected by codeine, and a reflex pathway associated with induced and chronic cough which is inhibited by codeine</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74618,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary pharmacology","volume":"9 5","pages":"Pages 293-297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/pulp.1996.0038","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952060096900381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Codeine is generally accepted as a standard or reference antitussive against which new antitussive medications can be compared. However there are very few studies which have investigated the antitussive efficacy of codeine using cough associated with upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and there is little if any evidence to support the antitussive efficacy of codeine in this model. This paper discusses the mechanism of cough in man and describes some clinical investigations on the effects of codeine on cough associated with URTI. The recent clinical investigations do not provide any evidence to support an antitussive action of codeine in the treatment of cough associated with URTI yet there is evidence in the literature which indicates that codeine inhibits fictive cough in animal models and also has antitussive activity against both induced and chronic cough models in man. In order to explain these different effects of codeine on the different models of cough, a hypothesis is put forward that there are two cough pathways in man. A voluntary pathway associated with cough related to URTI which is not affected by codeine, and a reflex pathway associated with induced and chronic cough which is inhibited by codeine

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可待因,咳嗽和上呼吸道感染
可待因被普遍接受为标准或参考止咳药,可与新的止咳药物进行比较。然而,很少有研究调查可待因对上呼吸道感染(URTI)相关咳嗽的止咳效果,并且在该模型中几乎没有证据支持可待因的止咳效果。本文讨论了人类咳嗽的发病机制,并介绍了可待因治疗尿路感染咳嗽的一些临床研究。最近的临床研究没有提供任何证据支持可待因在治疗与尿路感染相关的咳嗽中的止咳作用,但文献中有证据表明可待因在动物模型中抑制有效咳嗽,并且对人类诱导和慢性咳嗽模型也有止咳作用。为了解释可待因对不同咳嗽模式的不同影响,提出了一个假设,即人类有两条咳嗽途径。与尿路感染相关的咳嗽相关的自愿途径不受可待因的影响,与诱发和慢性咳嗽相关的反射途径受可待因的抑制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of the Larynx in Cough Central Nervous Mechanisms in Cough Sensory Mechanisms Inhalation Cough Challenge in the Investigation of the Cough Reflex and Antitussives Cough and Other Reflexes on Irritation of Airway Mucosa in Man
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1