New long-stay patients on acute psychiatric units: does audit change practice?

P Rowlands
{"title":"New long-stay patients on acute psychiatric units: does audit change practice?","authors":"P Rowlands","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients who have prolonged stays on acute psychiatric wards are a feature of many modern community psychiatric services. The present study aimed to determine if the care delivered to these patients could be improved by reflecting back to practitioners easily auditable components of the patients' care. The subjects comprised patients resident on the acute psychiatric units in Sheffield for more than six months. These patients were surveyed in April 1995 and again in February 1996. After the first survey, clinicians received a presentation and feedback regarding aspects of their patients' care. The results demonstrated there had been little change in the percentage of acute bed capacity occupied by patients with inpatient stays in excess of six months, despite improvement in many of the audit standards. The main reason for prolonged inpatient treatment was continued mental state or behavioural disturbance. The mean length of stay of patients in this category actually increased. The results suggest that a simple audit exercise can improve the quality of care delivered to this group of patients, but that they will continue to occupy a substantial proportion of acute bed capacity in the absence of suitable alternative treatment settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22312,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of clinical practice","volume":"51 3","pages":"154-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients who have prolonged stays on acute psychiatric wards are a feature of many modern community psychiatric services. The present study aimed to determine if the care delivered to these patients could be improved by reflecting back to practitioners easily auditable components of the patients' care. The subjects comprised patients resident on the acute psychiatric units in Sheffield for more than six months. These patients were surveyed in April 1995 and again in February 1996. After the first survey, clinicians received a presentation and feedback regarding aspects of their patients' care. The results demonstrated there had been little change in the percentage of acute bed capacity occupied by patients with inpatient stays in excess of six months, despite improvement in many of the audit standards. The main reason for prolonged inpatient treatment was continued mental state or behavioural disturbance. The mean length of stay of patients in this category actually increased. The results suggest that a simple audit exercise can improve the quality of care delivered to this group of patients, but that they will continue to occupy a substantial proportion of acute bed capacity in the absence of suitable alternative treatment settings.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新的长期住院病人在急性精神科:审计改变实践吗?
在急性精神科病房长期住院的病人是许多现代社区精神科服务的一个特点。本研究的目的是确定提供给这些患者的护理是否可以通过向从业人员反映容易审计的患者护理成分来改善。受试者包括在谢菲尔德急性精神科住院超过6个月的患者。1995年4月和1996年2月分别对这些病人进行了调查。在第一次调查之后,临床医生收到了关于患者护理方面的介绍和反馈。结果表明,尽管许多审计标准有所改善,但住院时间超过6个月的病人所占急症床位的百分比几乎没有变化。长期住院治疗的主要原因是持续的精神状态或行为障碍。这类病人的平均住院时间实际上增加了。结果表明,一个简单的审计工作可以提高提供给这组患者的护理质量,但在缺乏合适的替代治疗环境的情况下,他们将继续占据急症病床容量的相当大比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CANCER PREVENTION. COLIC. Diabetes mellitus. Renal artery stenosis. Tirofiban--spinning the data from fact to hype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1