Dynamics of MLAEP changes in midazolam-induced sedation

D Morlet , O Bertrand , F Salord , R Boulieu , J Pernier , C Fischer
{"title":"Dynamics of MLAEP changes in midazolam-induced sedation","authors":"D Morlet ,&nbsp;O Bertrand ,&nbsp;F Salord ,&nbsp;R Boulieu ,&nbsp;J Pernier ,&nbsp;C Fischer","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00044-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>This study aimed at assessing the effects of midazolam (MDZ) sedation on auditory brainstem (BAEP) and middle latency (MLAEP) </span>evoked potentials in intensive care conditions. Ten ventilated comatose patients were receiving an intravenous MDZ bolus dose (0.2 mg/kg) followed by a 2 h continuous infusion (0.1 mg/kg/h). MLAEPs and BAEPs elicited by clicks (90 dB HL+masking) were simultaneously and continuously monitored during the first 6 h and for 30 min the next morning. We found no effect of MDZ sedation on BAEPs. Only </span>MLAEP<span> components were modified. However, none of the patients presented any total abolition of the MLAEPs. Bolus injection led to very early alteration of cortical responses, beginning after 5 min and lasting almost 1 h (maximum Pa latency increase, 3.1 ms; maximum Pa-Nb amplitude decrease, 46%). During continuous infusion, MLAEPs remained slightly, although significantly, altered (Pa latency, +1.3 ms; Pa-Nb amplitude, 27%). The Nb wave seemed to be modified earlier and to return to normality later than the Pa wave. These findings incite a careful interpretation of MLAEP tracings acquired during the first hour following MDZ bolus injection. If possible, MDZ should be administered as continuous infusion for reliable interpretation of evoked potential changes in intensive care unit, or during surgery.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"104 5","pages":"Pages 437-446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00044-0","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559797000440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

This study aimed at assessing the effects of midazolam (MDZ) sedation on auditory brainstem (BAEP) and middle latency (MLAEP) evoked potentials in intensive care conditions. Ten ventilated comatose patients were receiving an intravenous MDZ bolus dose (0.2 mg/kg) followed by a 2 h continuous infusion (0.1 mg/kg/h). MLAEPs and BAEPs elicited by clicks (90 dB HL+masking) were simultaneously and continuously monitored during the first 6 h and for 30 min the next morning. We found no effect of MDZ sedation on BAEPs. Only MLAEP components were modified. However, none of the patients presented any total abolition of the MLAEPs. Bolus injection led to very early alteration of cortical responses, beginning after 5 min and lasting almost 1 h (maximum Pa latency increase, 3.1 ms; maximum Pa-Nb amplitude decrease, 46%). During continuous infusion, MLAEPs remained slightly, although significantly, altered (Pa latency, +1.3 ms; Pa-Nb amplitude, 27%). The Nb wave seemed to be modified earlier and to return to normality later than the Pa wave. These findings incite a careful interpretation of MLAEP tracings acquired during the first hour following MDZ bolus injection. If possible, MDZ should be administered as continuous infusion for reliable interpretation of evoked potential changes in intensive care unit, or during surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咪达唑仑诱导镇静时MLAEP变化的动态
本研究旨在评估咪达唑仑(MDZ)镇静对重症监护患者听觉脑干(BAEP)和中潜伏期(MLAEP)诱发电位的影响。10例通气昏迷患者静脉注射MDZ (0.2 mg/kg),随后连续输注2h (0.1 mg/kg/h)。同时连续监测点击(90 dB HL+掩蔽)引起的mlaep和baep,监测时间为前6小时和第二天早上30分钟。我们未发现MDZ镇静对BAEPs有影响。只有MLAEP组件被修改。然而,没有患者表现出mlaep的完全消除。大剂量注射导致皮质反应的早期改变,在5分钟后开始,持续近1小时(最大Pa潜伏期增加,3.1 ms;最大Pa-Nb幅度下降46%)。在持续输注期间,mlaep虽有明显改变,但仍有轻微变化(Pa潜伏期,+1.3 ms;Pa-Nb振幅,27%)。Nb波似乎比Pa波更早改变,更晚恢复正常。这些发现激发了对注射MDZ后第一个小时内获得的MLAEP示踪的仔细解释。如果可能的话,MDZ应连续输注,以可靠地解释重症监护病房或手术期间的诱发电位变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual Evoked Potentials Clinical Evoked Potentials: An Illustrated Manual Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Motor Evoked Potentials Cochlear implant performance and electrically-evoked auditory brain-stem response characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1