3 How can we measure bone quality?

PhD Didier Hans (Assistant Adjunct Professor of Radiology), PhD Thomas Fuerst (Assistant Adjunct Professor of Radiology), PhD Thomas Lang (Assistant Adjunct Professor of Radiology), PhD Sharmila Majumdar (Associate Professor in Resident), PhD Ying Lu (Assistant Adjunct Professor of Radiology), MD Harry K. Genant (Professor of Radiology, Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery), PhD Claus Glüer (Professor of Medical Physics)
{"title":"3 How can we measure bone quality?","authors":"PhD Didier Hans (Assistant Adjunct Professor of Radiology),&nbsp;PhD Thomas Fuerst (Assistant Adjunct Professor of Radiology),&nbsp;PhD Thomas Lang (Assistant Adjunct Professor of Radiology),&nbsp;PhD Sharmila Majumdar (Associate Professor in Resident),&nbsp;PhD Ying Lu (Assistant Adjunct Professor of Radiology),&nbsp;MD Harry K. Genant (Professor of Radiology, Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery),&nbsp;PhD Claus Glüer (Professor of Medical Physics)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80017-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Osteoporosis is a systematic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue. This leads to diminished biomechanical competence of the skeleton and is associated with low-trauma or atraumatic fractures. In the past decade, considerable progress has been made in the development of methods for assessing the skeleton non-invasively, so that osteoporosis can be better managed. While dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is still the preferred methodology, several limitations will be addressed. Another densitometric technique which is widely accepted for diagnosis of spinal osteoporosis is single energy QCT. Measurements of vertebral trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) demonstrate larger percentage decrements between vertebrally-fractured subjects and normal controls, and confer higher relative risks for vertebral fracture than either anteroposterior or lateral DXA measurements. As an emerging alternative to photon absorptiometry techniques, there is a growing interest in the use of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements for the noninvasive assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk in the management of osteoporosis. The attractiveness of QUS lies in the fact that indirect and in vitro experience has suggested that ultrasound may give information not only about BMD but also about architecture and elasticity. Whether or not combining QUS and DXA improve fracture prediction is still unclear and needs further analysis. Due to the growing evidence supporting the use of QUS in osteoporosis and the large number of QUS devices already on the market, a general clinical consensus on the application of QUS is urgently needed. Other techniques that are less widely used for the management of osteoporosis. For example, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) and magnetic resonance microscopy are promising tools for the evaluation of the skeleton. For example, the ability of QMR and high resolution magnetic resonance imaging has been explored and shows promise as a technique for assessing trabecular bone structure in osteoporosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77032,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 495-515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80017-9","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950357997800179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a systematic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue. This leads to diminished biomechanical competence of the skeleton and is associated with low-trauma or atraumatic fractures. In the past decade, considerable progress has been made in the development of methods for assessing the skeleton non-invasively, so that osteoporosis can be better managed. While dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is still the preferred methodology, several limitations will be addressed. Another densitometric technique which is widely accepted for diagnosis of spinal osteoporosis is single energy QCT. Measurements of vertebral trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) demonstrate larger percentage decrements between vertebrally-fractured subjects and normal controls, and confer higher relative risks for vertebral fracture than either anteroposterior or lateral DXA measurements. As an emerging alternative to photon absorptiometry techniques, there is a growing interest in the use of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements for the noninvasive assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk in the management of osteoporosis. The attractiveness of QUS lies in the fact that indirect and in vitro experience has suggested that ultrasound may give information not only about BMD but also about architecture and elasticity. Whether or not combining QUS and DXA improve fracture prediction is still unclear and needs further analysis. Due to the growing evidence supporting the use of QUS in osteoporosis and the large number of QUS devices already on the market, a general clinical consensus on the application of QUS is urgently needed. Other techniques that are less widely used for the management of osteoporosis. For example, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) and magnetic resonance microscopy are promising tools for the evaluation of the skeleton. For example, the ability of QMR and high resolution magnetic resonance imaging has been explored and shows promise as a technique for assessing trabecular bone structure in osteoporosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们如何测量骨骼质量?
骨质疏松症是一种系统性骨骼疾病,其特征是骨量低和骨组织的微结构退化。这导致骨骼的生物力学能力下降,并与低创伤或非创伤性骨折有关。在过去的十年中,在非侵入性评估骨骼的方法的发展方面取得了相当大的进展,从而可以更好地管理骨质疏松症。虽然双x射线吸收测定法(DXA)仍然是首选的方法,但将解决几个限制。另一种被广泛接受用于诊断脊柱骨质疏松症的密度测量技术是单能QCT。椎骨小梁骨密度(BMD)测量结果显示,与正常对照相比,椎骨骨折受试者的骨密度下降百分比更大,与正位或侧位DXA测量相比,椎骨骨折的相对风险更高。作为光子吸收测定技术的一种新兴替代方法,在骨质疏松症的治疗中,定量超声(QUS)测量用于无创评估骨质疏松性骨折风险的兴趣越来越大。QUS的吸引力在于,间接和体外经验表明,超声不仅可以提供有关BMD的信息,还可以提供有关结构和弹性的信息。QUS与DXA的结合是否能改善裂缝预测,目前尚不清楚,需要进一步分析。由于越来越多的证据支持QUS在骨质疏松症中的应用,并且市场上已经有大量的QUS设备,因此迫切需要对QUS的应用达成普遍的临床共识。其他不太广泛用于骨质疏松症治疗的技术。例如,外围定量计算机断层扫描、定量磁共振(QMR)和磁共振显微镜是评估骨骼的有前途的工具。例如,QMR和高分辨率磁共振成像的能力已经被探索,并显示出作为评估骨质疏松症小梁骨结构的技术的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regional musculoskeletal pain. Introduction Frequency and impact of regional musculoskeletal disorders What are the mechanisms of regional musculoskeletal pain? Diagnosing regional pain: the view from primary care Treatment options for regional musculoskeletal pain: what is the evidence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1