4 Bone markers

PhD Patrick Garnero (Research Scientist), MD, PhD Pierre D. Delmas (Professor of Medicine and Director)
{"title":"4 Bone markers","authors":"PhD Patrick Garnero (Research Scientist),&nbsp;MD, PhD Pierre D. Delmas (Professor of Medicine and Director)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80018-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The recent development of specific and sensitive biochemical markers reflecting the overall rate of bone formation and bone resorption, has markedly improved the non-invasive assessment of bone turnover in various metabolic bone diseases, especially osteoporosis. The immunoassay of human osteocalcin recognizing the intact molecule and its major proteolytic fragment, along with that of bone alkaline phosphatase, are currently the most sensitive markers to assess bone formation. For bone resorption, the total urinary excretion of pyridinoline crosslinks measured by high pressure liquid chromatography has shown its superiority over all other markers for the clinical assessment of osteoporosis. The recent development of immunoassays recognizing either the free pyridinoline crosslinks or pyridinoline crosslinked-type I collagen peptides in urine and serum should allow a broad use of this sensitive resorption marker. Recent studies, some of them still in progress, define the clinical use of these markers: first, to improve the prognostic assessment of post-menopausal women in combination with bone mass measurement, i.e. their risk of developing osteoporosis and, ultimately, fractures and, second, to monitor the efficacy of anti-resorption drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77032,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 517-537"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80018-0","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950357997800180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

The recent development of specific and sensitive biochemical markers reflecting the overall rate of bone formation and bone resorption, has markedly improved the non-invasive assessment of bone turnover in various metabolic bone diseases, especially osteoporosis. The immunoassay of human osteocalcin recognizing the intact molecule and its major proteolytic fragment, along with that of bone alkaline phosphatase, are currently the most sensitive markers to assess bone formation. For bone resorption, the total urinary excretion of pyridinoline crosslinks measured by high pressure liquid chromatography has shown its superiority over all other markers for the clinical assessment of osteoporosis. The recent development of immunoassays recognizing either the free pyridinoline crosslinks or pyridinoline crosslinked-type I collagen peptides in urine and serum should allow a broad use of this sensitive resorption marker. Recent studies, some of them still in progress, define the clinical use of these markers: first, to improve the prognostic assessment of post-menopausal women in combination with bone mass measurement, i.e. their risk of developing osteoporosis and, ultimately, fractures and, second, to monitor the efficacy of anti-resorption drugs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4骨骼标记物
近年来,反映骨形成和骨吸收总体速度的特异性和敏感性生化标志物的发展,显著提高了对各种代谢性骨疾病,特别是骨质疏松症的骨转换的无创评估。人骨钙素的免疫测定识别完整分子及其主要蛋白水解片段,以及骨碱性磷酸酶的免疫测定是目前评估骨形成最敏感的标志物。对于骨吸收,用高压液相色谱法测量尿中吡啶啉交联的总排泄量,在骨质疏松症的临床评估中显示出其优于所有其他标志物的优势。最近在尿和血清中识别游离吡啶啉交联或吡啶啉交联的I型胶原肽的免疫测定方法的发展,应该允许广泛使用这种敏感的吸收标志物。最近的一些研究(其中一些仍在进行中)确定了这些标志物的临床用途:首先,结合骨量测量改善绝经后妇女的预后评估,即她们患骨质疏松症和最终骨折的风险;其次,监测抗吸收药物的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regional musculoskeletal pain. Introduction Frequency and impact of regional musculoskeletal disorders What are the mechanisms of regional musculoskeletal pain? Diagnosing regional pain: the view from primary care Treatment options for regional musculoskeletal pain: what is the evidence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1