Perceived determinants of risk for breast cancer and the relations among objective risk, perceived risk, and screening behavior over time.

Women's health (Hillsdale, N.J.) Pub Date : 1995-01-01
L S Aiken, A M Fenaughty, S G West, J J Johnson, T L Luckett
{"title":"Perceived determinants of risk for breast cancer and the relations among objective risk, perceived risk, and screening behavior over time.","authors":"L S Aiken,&nbsp;A M Fenaughty,&nbsp;S G West,&nbsp;J J Johnson,&nbsp;T L Luckett","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interrelations among perceived risk for breast cancer, objective risk factors, and both breast self-examination (BSE) and mammography screening were examined across two waves of a longitudinal study of breast cancer screening. Participants were a community sample of 335 predominantly White middle-class women, aged 37 to 77, who had not had breast cancer. Factors believed by women to determine their self-rated risk level for breast cancer were investigated. Women held optimistic biases about their own breast cancer risk; they often erroneously attributed their relatively lower perceived risk to personal actions, including mammography screening. Compliance with mammography screening but not BSE recommendations increased over time. Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer was related to both family history and breast symptomatology; early mammography screening was positively related to perceived susceptibility later in time.</p>","PeriodicalId":79542,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (Hillsdale, N.J.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"27-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (Hillsdale, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interrelations among perceived risk for breast cancer, objective risk factors, and both breast self-examination (BSE) and mammography screening were examined across two waves of a longitudinal study of breast cancer screening. Participants were a community sample of 335 predominantly White middle-class women, aged 37 to 77, who had not had breast cancer. Factors believed by women to determine their self-rated risk level for breast cancer were investigated. Women held optimistic biases about their own breast cancer risk; they often erroneously attributed their relatively lower perceived risk to personal actions, including mammography screening. Compliance with mammography screening but not BSE recommendations increased over time. Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer was related to both family history and breast symptomatology; early mammography screening was positively related to perceived susceptibility later in time.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌风险的感知决定因素以及客观风险、感知风险和筛查行为之间的关系。
通过对乳腺癌筛查的两波纵向研究,研究了乳腺癌感知风险、客观危险因素、乳房自检(BSE)和乳房x线摄影筛查之间的相互关系。参与者是一个社区样本,335名主要是白人中产阶级女性,年龄在37到77岁之间,没有患过乳腺癌。研究人员调查了女性认为决定其乳腺癌自我评估风险水平的因素。女性对自己患乳腺癌的风险持有乐观的偏见;他们经常错误地将自己相对较低的风险归因于个人行为,包括乳房x光检查。随着时间的推移,乳房x光检查的依从性而不是疯牛病的建议。乳腺癌易感性与家族史和乳房症状有关;早期乳房x光检查与后期感知易感性呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The long-term effects of battering on women's health. Provision of mental health services in women's health centers. Naive beliefs about breast cancer risk. The effect of alternative work arrangements on women's well-being: a demand-control model. A home-based behavioral intervention to promote walking in sedentary ethnic minority women: project WALK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1