The genetic basis of human scientific knowledge.

R N Shepard
{"title":"The genetic basis of human scientific knowledge.","authors":"R N Shepard","doi":"10.1002/9780470515372.ch3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ecologically most significant respect in which humankind now dominates all other terrestrial species is in its scientific understanding and technological manipulation of the world. What psychological adaptation underlies this seemingly discontinuous development? There is reason to believe that natural selection has endowed the perceptual/representational systems not only of humans but also of other perceptually and cognitively advanced animals with an implicit knowledge of pervasive and enduring properties of the world. Perhaps especially in the human species, natural selection has, in addition, favoured a heightened degree of voluntary access to the representational machinery embodying this implicit wisdom, thus facilitating the realistic mental simulation of possible actions in the world before taking the risk of carrying them out physically. This, together with the emergence of an unprecedented motivation toward understanding, seems to have enabled some human individuals to use 'thought experiments' to convert more and more of the implicit knowledge that we all share into a self-consistent set of explicit scientific laws. Although knowledge of the world must ultimately come from the world, as empiricists claim, it can in this way come through one's genes as well as through one's own direct perceptual interactions with the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":10218,"journal":{"name":"Ciba Foundation symposium","volume":"208 ","pages":"23-31; discussion 31-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciba Foundation symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470515372.ch3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The ecologically most significant respect in which humankind now dominates all other terrestrial species is in its scientific understanding and technological manipulation of the world. What psychological adaptation underlies this seemingly discontinuous development? There is reason to believe that natural selection has endowed the perceptual/representational systems not only of humans but also of other perceptually and cognitively advanced animals with an implicit knowledge of pervasive and enduring properties of the world. Perhaps especially in the human species, natural selection has, in addition, favoured a heightened degree of voluntary access to the representational machinery embodying this implicit wisdom, thus facilitating the realistic mental simulation of possible actions in the world before taking the risk of carrying them out physically. This, together with the emergence of an unprecedented motivation toward understanding, seems to have enabled some human individuals to use 'thought experiments' to convert more and more of the implicit knowledge that we all share into a self-consistent set of explicit scientific laws. Although knowledge of the world must ultimately come from the world, as empiricists claim, it can in this way come through one's genes as well as through one's own direct perceptual interactions with the world.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类科学知识的遗传基础。
人类现在支配所有其他陆地物种的最重要的生态方面是它对世界的科学理解和技术操纵。是什么心理适应导致了这种看似不连续的发展?我们有理由相信,自然选择不仅赋予了人类的感知/表征系统,也赋予了其他具有感知和认知能力的高级动物对世界普遍和持久特性的隐性知识。也许在人类物种中尤其如此,此外,自然选择倾向于高度自愿地接触体现这种隐性智慧的表征机制,从而促进了在冒险采取实际行动之前对世界上可能的行动进行现实的心理模拟。这一点,再加上一种前所未有的理解动机的出现,似乎使一些人能够使用“思想实验”,将越来越多的我们共同拥有的隐性知识转化为一套自我一致的明确科学定律。尽管像经验主义者声称的那样,对世界的知识最终必须来自世界,但它可以通过这种方式来自一个人的基因,也可以通过一个人自己与世界的直接感知互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microdensitometry. Peptide metabolism. Local and collective motions in protein dynamics. The 'see-saw' theory of parturition. Salmonellosis: in retrospect and prospect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1