[Assessment of right gastroepiploic artery grafts by thallium scintigraphy].

S Hayashi, M Sasaki, J Kawamoto
{"title":"[Assessment of right gastroepiploic artery grafts by thallium scintigraphy].","authors":"S Hayashi,&nbsp;M Sasaki,&nbsp;J Kawamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From 1990 to 1996 we performed coronary artery bypass grafting using only arterial grafts. Both pre- and post-operative thallium-201 exercise myocardial scintigraphy were evaluated in 68 cases (161 grafts). The rate of improvement (%) was defined as follows: (number that showed improvement of perfusion of thallium on post-operative scintigraphy/number that showed decreased perfusion of thallium on pre-operative scintigraphy) x 100. Examination was made separately regarding cases of ischemia (102 grafts) and infarction (54 grafts). For ischemic cases, the rate of improvement using left internal thoracic artery (LITA), right internal thoracic artery (RITA) and right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) was 80% (12/15), 70% (7/10) and 71% (5/7) respectively. For infarction cases, the rate of improvement using LITA, RITA and RGEA was 54% (7/13), 60% (6/10) and 53% (9/17) respectively. Among these three groups no significant differences were noted. As a result, RGEA is thought to have usefulness equivalent to LITA and RITA.</p>","PeriodicalId":6434,"journal":{"name":"[Zasshi] [Journal]. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Zasshi] [Journal]. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From 1990 to 1996 we performed coronary artery bypass grafting using only arterial grafts. Both pre- and post-operative thallium-201 exercise myocardial scintigraphy were evaluated in 68 cases (161 grafts). The rate of improvement (%) was defined as follows: (number that showed improvement of perfusion of thallium on post-operative scintigraphy/number that showed decreased perfusion of thallium on pre-operative scintigraphy) x 100. Examination was made separately regarding cases of ischemia (102 grafts) and infarction (54 grafts). For ischemic cases, the rate of improvement using left internal thoracic artery (LITA), right internal thoracic artery (RITA) and right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) was 80% (12/15), 70% (7/10) and 71% (5/7) respectively. For infarction cases, the rate of improvement using LITA, RITA and RGEA was 54% (7/13), 60% (6/10) and 53% (9/17) respectively. Among these three groups no significant differences were noted. As a result, RGEA is thought to have usefulness equivalent to LITA and RITA.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[应用铊显像评价右胃网膜动脉移植]。
从1990年到1996年,我们只使用动脉移植进行冠状动脉旁路移植术。对68例(161例)移植物进行术前和术后铊-201运动心肌显像评价。改善率(%)定义为:(术后显像显示铊灌注改善的人数/术前显像显示铊灌注减少的人数)× 100。对缺血(102例)和梗死(54例)分别进行检查。对于缺血性病例,采用左胸廓内动脉(LITA)、右胸廓内动脉(RITA)和右胃网膜动脉(RGEA)的治愈率分别为80%(12/15)、70%(7/10)和71%(5/7)。对于梗死患者,LITA、RITA和RGEA的改良率分别为54%(7/13)、60%(6/10)和53%(9/17)。三组间无显著性差异。因此,RGEA被认为具有与LITA和RITA相当的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Surgical treatment of pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect]. [Treatment strategies for lung cancer brain metastases]. [Modification of the surgical strategy based on intraoperative echographic findings of atherosclerotic ascending aorta]. [Surgical treatment of double outlet left ventricle]. [Beneficial effect of a stable PGI2 analogue (ONO-1301) on prostanoid release after reperfusion in canine left single lung allotransplantation model].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1