Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery. I. Relationships between qualitative SEP alterations and intraoperative events

Jean-Michel Guérit, Catherine Witdoeckt, Marianne de Tourtchaninoff, Sophie Ghariani, Amin Matta, Robert Dion, Robert Verhelst
{"title":"Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery. I. Relationships between qualitative SEP alterations and intraoperative events","authors":"Jean-Michel Guérit,&nbsp;Catherine Witdoeckt,&nbsp;Marianne de Tourtchaninoff,&nbsp;Sophie Ghariani,&nbsp;Amin Matta,&nbsp;Robert Dion,&nbsp;Robert Verhelst","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00022-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>This paper presents the results of intraoperative median nerve SEP monitoring in 205 successive patients undergoing isolated </span>carotid endarterectomy (CE) (</span><em>N</em><span>=172) or CE followed by coronary bypass (CBP) and/or vascular replacement (VR) (</span><em>N</em><span>=33). The left and right median nerves were alternately stimulated and recordings performed on 4 channels: cervical, ipsi- and contralateral parietal, and frontal. SEPs were qualitatively rated in terms of mild, moderate, or severe ipsilateral, contralateral, or bilateral abnormalities. The SEP abnormalities were subdivided into 5 categories as a function of their relationships with intraoperative events: no alterations (67.3%), early or late SEP alterations after carotid cross-clamping (15.6%), SEP alterations after a drop in blood pressure (occurring outside of or within the cross-clamping period) (15.1%), SEP alterations of a most likely embolic origin (2.4%), SEP changes after head positioning (1%), and SEP changes after a modification of the anesthetic regimen (1.5%). Only moderate to severe SEP alterations occurring soon after carotid cross-clamping justified shunt installation in 16% of the cases. SEP alterations after a drop in blood pressure were reversed merely by restoring blood pressure. The neurological outcome was uneventful in 94.2% of cases. Of the 12 patients who developed neurological sequellae, only one case presented transient sequellae after isolated CE without SEP changes while most cases either had undergone combined CE and CBP and/or VR (6 cases) or had presented SEP alterations of embolic origin (3 cases). We conclude that our system of qualitative rating of SEPs proved very sensitive to intraoperative hemodynamic disturbances or macroembolisms.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"104 6","pages":"Pages 459-469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00022-1","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559797000221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

This paper presents the results of intraoperative median nerve SEP monitoring in 205 successive patients undergoing isolated carotid endarterectomy (CE) (N=172) or CE followed by coronary bypass (CBP) and/or vascular replacement (VR) (N=33). The left and right median nerves were alternately stimulated and recordings performed on 4 channels: cervical, ipsi- and contralateral parietal, and frontal. SEPs were qualitatively rated in terms of mild, moderate, or severe ipsilateral, contralateral, or bilateral abnormalities. The SEP abnormalities were subdivided into 5 categories as a function of their relationships with intraoperative events: no alterations (67.3%), early or late SEP alterations after carotid cross-clamping (15.6%), SEP alterations after a drop in blood pressure (occurring outside of or within the cross-clamping period) (15.1%), SEP alterations of a most likely embolic origin (2.4%), SEP changes after head positioning (1%), and SEP changes after a modification of the anesthetic regimen (1.5%). Only moderate to severe SEP alterations occurring soon after carotid cross-clamping justified shunt installation in 16% of the cases. SEP alterations after a drop in blood pressure were reversed merely by restoring blood pressure. The neurological outcome was uneventful in 94.2% of cases. Of the 12 patients who developed neurological sequellae, only one case presented transient sequellae after isolated CE without SEP changes while most cases either had undergone combined CE and CBP and/or VR (6 cases) or had presented SEP alterations of embolic origin (3 cases). We conclude that our system of qualitative rating of SEPs proved very sensitive to intraoperative hemodynamic disturbances or macroembolisms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈动脉手术中的体感诱发电位监测。1 .定性SEP改变与术中事件的关系
本文报道205例连续行颈动脉内膜切除术(CE) (N=172)或CE后冠状动脉搭桥术(CBP)和/或血管置换术(VR) (N=33)的患者术中正中神经SEP监测结果。交替刺激左右正中神经,记录4个通道:颈、对侧顶叶和额叶。SEPs被定性地评定为轻度、中度或重度同侧、对侧或双侧异常。SEP异常根据其与术中事件的关系被细分为5类:无改变(67.3%),颈动脉交叉夹持后早期或晚期SEP改变(15.6%),血压下降后SEP改变(发生在交叉夹持期外或内)(15.1%),最可能栓塞源的SEP改变(2.4%),头部定位后SEP改变(1%),以及麻醉方案修改后SEP改变(1.5%)。在16%的病例中,颈动脉交叉夹紧后不久发生的中度至重度SEP改变是合理的。血压下降后的SEP变化仅通过恢复血压即可逆转。94.2%的病例神经系统预后良好。在12例出现神经系统后遗症的患者中,只有1例在单独CE后出现短暂性后遗症,无SEP改变,而大多数患者要么联合CE和CBP和/或VR(6例),要么出现栓塞源性SEP改变(3例)。我们的结论是,我们的SEPs定性评分系统对术中血流动力学紊乱或大栓塞非常敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual Evoked Potentials Clinical Evoked Potentials: An Illustrated Manual Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Motor Evoked Potentials Cochlear implant performance and electrically-evoked auditory brain-stem response characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1