Cultural barriers to cancer screening among African American women: a critical review of the qualitative literature.

Women's health (Hillsdale, N.J.) Pub Date : 1997-09-01
L Hoffman-Goetz, S L Mills
{"title":"Cultural barriers to cancer screening among African American women: a critical review of the qualitative literature.","authors":"L Hoffman-Goetz,&nbsp;S L Mills","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There have been numerous studies demonstrating the enormous cancer burden for African American women and the impact of structural barriers in the dissemination of cancer control interventions. Few of these studies have dealt with the influence of cultural factors in the success or failure of intervention research. The purpose of this review is to provide a critical appraisal of qualitative studies that inform on social-cultural factors in cancer screening programs for African American women, and to evaluate the extent to which general methodologic criteria have been used in these studies. The article discusses the theoretical underpinnings of social science qualitative methodologies, including ethnography, hermeneutics, ethnomethodology, and symbolic interactionism. Published qualitative studies from 1980 to 1996 on cancer screening among African American women are critically reviewed. Among the themes identified were bruises as contributory to breast cancer development; the low priority women placed on personal preventive screening behaviors in the context of other family health priorities; and the importance of female friends, relatives, and social networks in the flow of cancer information. The importance of qualitative approaches to cancer prevention and control programs and policies is threefold: (a) collection of greater depth of information, (b) identification of processes and relations among behaviors, and (c) framing of variables and hypotheses for quantitative research. Greater emphasis on methodologic rigor will be necessary, however, if qualitative studies of cancer screening are to effectively inform the development of research, programs, and policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":79542,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (Hillsdale, N.J.)","volume":"3 3-4","pages":"183-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (Hillsdale, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There have been numerous studies demonstrating the enormous cancer burden for African American women and the impact of structural barriers in the dissemination of cancer control interventions. Few of these studies have dealt with the influence of cultural factors in the success or failure of intervention research. The purpose of this review is to provide a critical appraisal of qualitative studies that inform on social-cultural factors in cancer screening programs for African American women, and to evaluate the extent to which general methodologic criteria have been used in these studies. The article discusses the theoretical underpinnings of social science qualitative methodologies, including ethnography, hermeneutics, ethnomethodology, and symbolic interactionism. Published qualitative studies from 1980 to 1996 on cancer screening among African American women are critically reviewed. Among the themes identified were bruises as contributory to breast cancer development; the low priority women placed on personal preventive screening behaviors in the context of other family health priorities; and the importance of female friends, relatives, and social networks in the flow of cancer information. The importance of qualitative approaches to cancer prevention and control programs and policies is threefold: (a) collection of greater depth of information, (b) identification of processes and relations among behaviors, and (c) framing of variables and hypotheses for quantitative research. Greater emphasis on methodologic rigor will be necessary, however, if qualitative studies of cancer screening are to effectively inform the development of research, programs, and policies.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非裔美国妇女癌症筛查的文化障碍:对定性文献的批判性回顾。
有许多研究表明,非洲裔美国妇女的巨大癌症负担以及传播癌症控制干预措施的结构性障碍的影响。这些研究很少涉及文化因素对干预研究成功或失败的影响。本综述的目的是对非裔美国妇女癌症筛查项目中社会文化因素的定性研究进行批判性评价,并评估这些研究中使用的一般方法标准的程度。本文讨论了社会科学定性方法论的理论基础,包括民族志、解释学、民族方法学和符号互动学。从1980年到1996年发表的关于非裔美国妇女癌症筛查的定性研究进行了严格的审查。其中确定的主题包括:瘀伤会导致乳腺癌的发展;在其他家庭保健优先事项中,妇女对个人预防性筛查行为的重视程度较低;以及女性朋友、亲戚和社交网络在癌症信息传播中的重要性。定性方法对癌症预防和控制计划和政策的重要性有三个方面:(a)收集更深入的信息;(b)确定过程和行为之间的关系;(c)为定量研究构建变量和假设。然而,如果癌症筛查的定性研究要有效地为研究、项目和政策的发展提供信息,就必须更加强调方法的严谨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The long-term effects of battering on women's health. Provision of mental health services in women's health centers. Naive beliefs about breast cancer risk. The effect of alternative work arrangements on women's well-being: a demand-control model. A home-based behavioral intervention to promote walking in sedentary ethnic minority women: project WALK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1