Comparison of postoperative bupivacaine with lidocaine on pain and analgesic use following periodontal surgery.

M J Kaurich, J Otomo-Corgel, R J Nagy
{"title":"Comparison of postoperative bupivacaine with lidocaine on pain and analgesic use following periodontal surgery.","authors":"M J Kaurich,&nbsp;J Otomo-Corgel,&nbsp;R J Nagy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative administration of bupivacaine, a long-acting local anesthetic, with lidocaine, a short-acting local anesthetic, on pain perception and analgesic use following periodontal surgery. Ten male subjects were selected on the basis of having similar bilateral mandibular quadrants with moderate to severe periodontal disease requiring osseous surgery. The study was a matched-pair, double-blind design. Carpules of 2% xylocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine were wrapped in opaque tape and placed in separate coded envelopes. At the time of suturing, the quadrant was injected with one Carpule from one envelope. The Carpules from the second envelope were saved for the second surgery, which took place approximately one month later. Subjects were given standardized postoperative instructions and prescriptions for Peridex and Tylenol #3. They were told not to take the analgesic unless pain or discomfort occurred. They were given a self-administered questionnaire and asked to assess pain and/or discomfort 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after the procedure, the amount of analgesic taken, and time when complete sensation returned. Results showed that the quadrants which received lidocaine maintained postoperative anesthesia an average of 2.47 hours while the Marcaine quadrants had a significantly longer duration of 5.62 hours. A large intra- and intersubject variability was noted in the amount of analgesic taken. The lidocaine group reported an average of 3.70 tablets versus a significantly smaller amount for the bupivacaine group of 1.60 tablets. Throughout all time intervals, the bupivacaine group reported significantly less pain than the lidocaine group. When used at the end of a mandibular periodontal surgical procedure, bupivacaine provides a significantly greater duration of anesthesia, decreased postoperative pain, and a reduction of anesthesia, decreased postoperative pain, and a reduction in the amount of analgesics taken.</p>","PeriodicalId":76686,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Western Society of Periodontology/Periodontal abstracts","volume":"45 1","pages":"5-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Western Society of Periodontology/Periodontal abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative administration of bupivacaine, a long-acting local anesthetic, with lidocaine, a short-acting local anesthetic, on pain perception and analgesic use following periodontal surgery. Ten male subjects were selected on the basis of having similar bilateral mandibular quadrants with moderate to severe periodontal disease requiring osseous surgery. The study was a matched-pair, double-blind design. Carpules of 2% xylocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine were wrapped in opaque tape and placed in separate coded envelopes. At the time of suturing, the quadrant was injected with one Carpule from one envelope. The Carpules from the second envelope were saved for the second surgery, which took place approximately one month later. Subjects were given standardized postoperative instructions and prescriptions for Peridex and Tylenol #3. They were told not to take the analgesic unless pain or discomfort occurred. They were given a self-administered questionnaire and asked to assess pain and/or discomfort 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after the procedure, the amount of analgesic taken, and time when complete sensation returned. Results showed that the quadrants which received lidocaine maintained postoperative anesthesia an average of 2.47 hours while the Marcaine quadrants had a significantly longer duration of 5.62 hours. A large intra- and intersubject variability was noted in the amount of analgesic taken. The lidocaine group reported an average of 3.70 tablets versus a significantly smaller amount for the bupivacaine group of 1.60 tablets. Throughout all time intervals, the bupivacaine group reported significantly less pain than the lidocaine group. When used at the end of a mandibular periodontal surgical procedure, bupivacaine provides a significantly greater duration of anesthesia, decreased postoperative pain, and a reduction of anesthesia, decreased postoperative pain, and a reduction in the amount of analgesics taken.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布比卡因与利多卡因对牙周手术后疼痛及镇痛作用的比较。
本研究的目的是比较布比卡因(一种长效局麻药)和利多卡因(一种短效局麻药)对牙周手术后疼痛感知和镇痛使用的影响。选取双侧下颌象限相似且患有中度至重度牙周病且需要骨外科手术的男性受试者10名。该研究采用配对双盲设计。2%木卡因和0.5%布比卡因分别加1:10万肾上腺素和1:20万肾上腺素的药瓶用不透明胶带包裹,放在单独的编码信封中。在缝合时,从一个包膜中注射一枚卡普勒。第二次手术大约在一个月后进行。受试者接受标准化的术后指导和处方,使用Peridex和泰诺#3。他们被告知,除非出现疼痛或不适,否则不要服用止痛药。给他们一份自我管理的问卷,并要求他们在手术后2、4、6、8、10和12小时评估疼痛和/或不适,止痛药的用量,以及完全感觉恢复的时间。结果显示,利多卡因组术后麻醉维持时间平均为2.47小时,而可卡因组术后麻醉维持时间明显延长,为5.62小时。在服用镇痛药的量上,受试者内部和受试者之间存在很大的差异。利多卡因组平均服用3.70片,而布比卡因组平均服用1.60片。在所有时间间隔内,布比卡因组报告的疼痛明显小于利多卡因组。当在下颌牙周外科手术结束时使用布比卡因时,麻醉时间明显延长,术后疼痛减轻,麻醉减轻,术后疼痛减轻,镇痛药用量减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Periodontal probing. Hereditary gingival fibromatosis--review of the literature. Demineralized dentin matrix and bone graft: a review of literature. Black yeast in dental unit waterlines. II. Remediation project report. Review of the literature on sodium hypochlorite as a treatment modality in periodontal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1