[Validity and reliability of the anticipatory cognition questionnaire. Study Group ACQ. Anticipatory cognition questionnaire].

J J López Ibor, J A Ramos Brieva, J L Ayuso Gutiérrez
{"title":"[Validity and reliability of the anticipatory cognition questionnaire. Study Group ACQ. Anticipatory cognition questionnaire].","authors":"J J López Ibor,&nbsp;J A Ramos Brieva,&nbsp;J L Ayuso Gutiérrez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>From the cognitive perspective, the inability in order to advance the future positively, it is an essential characteristic in the depression. The Anticipatory Cognitions Questionnaire (ACQ), with eight items with a proposal cognitive-anticipatory, has been developed with the objective of detecting cases of depression by means of the screening of the existence of that difficulty of bringing forward.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>It have been carried out a multicentric study between Spain and several countries of Spanish America (Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Mexico and Venezuela). For it, a Spanish version of the ACQ was used, agreed between the investigators of both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Were interviewed 291 out and in depressed patients (CIE-10), and 158 healthy controls. Evaluated them in four serial occasions (two for the controls), using the ACQ, the Hamilton's and Zung's scales for Depression, and a Global Clinical Impression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From their outputs seems to deduce that the ACQ has a good internal consistency (alpha = 0.72), elevated temporal reliability (r = 0.81, good screening capacity for depression with a cut-off equal to \"7\" (kappa = 0.48-0.70), and good sensitivity to change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Everything it support that ACQ, in their Spanish version, it is an useful instrument for the ends that was developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75429,"journal":{"name":"Actas luso-espanolas de neurologia, psiquiatria y ciencias afines","volume":"25 6","pages":"351-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas luso-espanolas de neurologia, psiquiatria y ciencias afines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: From the cognitive perspective, the inability in order to advance the future positively, it is an essential characteristic in the depression. The Anticipatory Cognitions Questionnaire (ACQ), with eight items with a proposal cognitive-anticipatory, has been developed with the objective of detecting cases of depression by means of the screening of the existence of that difficulty of bringing forward.

Material and methods: It have been carried out a multicentric study between Spain and several countries of Spanish America (Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Mexico and Venezuela). For it, a Spanish version of the ACQ was used, agreed between the investigators of both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Were interviewed 291 out and in depressed patients (CIE-10), and 158 healthy controls. Evaluated them in four serial occasions (two for the controls), using the ACQ, the Hamilton's and Zung's scales for Depression, and a Global Clinical Impression.

Results: From their outputs seems to deduce that the ACQ has a good internal consistency (alpha = 0.72), elevated temporal reliability (r = 0.81, good screening capacity for depression with a cut-off equal to "7" (kappa = 0.48-0.70), and good sensitivity to change.

Conclusions: Everything it support that ACQ, in their Spanish version, it is an useful instrument for the ends that was developed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预期认知问卷的效度和信度。ACQ研究组。预期认知问卷]。
引言:从认知的角度来看,无法积极地推进未来,这是抑郁症的一个本质特征。预见性认知问卷(ACQ)有8个项目,建议认知预见性,其目的是通过筛选是否存在提出困难来发现抑郁症病例。材料和方法:西班牙和西班牙美洲的几个国家(阿根廷、智利、哥斯达黎加、墨西哥和委内瑞拉)之间进行了一项多中心研究。为此,经大西洋两岸的调查人员同意,使用了西班牙语版的ACQ。访谈了291名抑郁患者(CIE-10)和158名健康对照者。用ACQ量表、Hamilton’s和Zung’s抑郁量表和全球临床印象量表对他们进行了四次连续评估(两次作为对照组)。结果:从他们的输出似乎可以推断出ACQ具有良好的内部一致性(alpha = 0.72),较高的时间可靠性(r = 0.81),良好的抑郁症筛查能力(截断值为“7”)(kappa = 0.48-0.70),以及良好的变化敏感性。结论:它所支持的一切,在其西班牙语版本中,它是一个有用的工具,用于所开发的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Benzodiazepines in the treatment of schizophrenia: a review]. [Psychiatric symptoms in Cushing syndrome: a clinical case]. [Apolipoproteins and cognitive deterioration]. [Normative data for the neuropsychological evaluation of intravenous drug users]. [Importance of the early diagnosis of malignant neuroleptic syndrome: report of 2 cases].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1