Transplantation in the elderly: a review.

S V Jassal, G Opelz, E Cole
{"title":"Transplantation in the elderly: a review.","authors":"S V Jassal,&nbsp;G Opelz,&nbsp;E Cole","doi":"10.1023/a:1008246129084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>1. To review current knowledge about patient and graft survival, complication rates, patient selection and management protocols in patients aged 60 years or more with a renal transplant. 2. To review the advantages and disadvantages of cadaveric organ retrieval from older donors.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Evidence was obtained from published articles identified using a MEDLINE search from 1976 to 1996; expert opinion and citations from previous review articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survival rates have improved with time and now range from 54 to 75% 5-year patient survival and 52-74% 5-year graft survival. The most common reason for graft loss is patient death as both acute and chronic rejection is less commonly seen in older patients. Censored graft survival (if death with a functioning graft is treated as censored data) is higher in elderly patients compared to younger ESRD patients. Based on cohort data from an administrative database a survival advantage is seen in older dialysis patients accepted for transplantation even after matching for comorbidity. Post-transplant morbidity is mainly attributable to infectious complications and an increased prevalence of malignancy. There is insufficient data about the most optimal immunosuppression regime and further research is required in this direction. The evidence currently supports the use of kidneys from older donors because of a relative lack of cadaveric organs from younger donors although a worse patient and graft outcome is recognized in the long term. Insufficient evidence exists to support a firm conclusion regarding age matching or targeting of older organs to special groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":79490,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric nephrology and urology","volume":"7 3","pages":"157-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1008246129084","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric nephrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008246129084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Purpose: 1. To review current knowledge about patient and graft survival, complication rates, patient selection and management protocols in patients aged 60 years or more with a renal transplant. 2. To review the advantages and disadvantages of cadaveric organ retrieval from older donors.

Data sources: Evidence was obtained from published articles identified using a MEDLINE search from 1976 to 1996; expert opinion and citations from previous review articles.

Results: Survival rates have improved with time and now range from 54 to 75% 5-year patient survival and 52-74% 5-year graft survival. The most common reason for graft loss is patient death as both acute and chronic rejection is less commonly seen in older patients. Censored graft survival (if death with a functioning graft is treated as censored data) is higher in elderly patients compared to younger ESRD patients. Based on cohort data from an administrative database a survival advantage is seen in older dialysis patients accepted for transplantation even after matching for comorbidity. Post-transplant morbidity is mainly attributable to infectious complications and an increased prevalence of malignancy. There is insufficient data about the most optimal immunosuppression regime and further research is required in this direction. The evidence currently supports the use of kidneys from older donors because of a relative lack of cadaveric organs from younger donors although a worse patient and graft outcome is recognized in the long term. Insufficient evidence exists to support a firm conclusion regarding age matching or targeting of older organs to special groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年移植:综述。
目的:1。回顾60岁及以上肾移植患者的生存、并发症发生率、患者选择和管理方案。2. 综述老年供体尸体器官摘取的优缺点。数据来源:证据来自1976年至1996年通过MEDLINE检索确定的已发表文章;专家意见和先前评论文章的引用。结果:生存率随着时间的推移而提高,目前5年患者生存率为54 - 75%,5年移植物生存率为52-74%。移植损失最常见的原因是患者死亡,因为急性和慢性排斥反应在老年患者中较少见。与年轻ESRD患者相比,老年患者的移植存活率(如果移植功能死亡被视为审查数据)更高。根据来自管理数据库的队列数据,即使在合并症匹配后,接受移植的老年透析患者也有生存优势。移植后的发病率主要是由于感染并发症和恶性肿瘤的发病率增加。关于最佳免疫抑制方案的数据不足,需要在这方面进行进一步的研究。目前的证据支持使用老年捐赠者的肾脏,因为相对缺乏年轻捐赠者的尸体器官,尽管从长远来看,患者和移植结果较差。没有足够的证据支持关于年龄匹配或针对特殊群体的老年器官的确切结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peer-to-peer connections: Perceptions of a social support app designed for young adults with cancer. New insights related to aging and renal osteodystrophy. The hypertensive elderly male with prostatism. Should the sale of analgesic mixtures and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) continue to be allowed as over-the-counter (OTC) medications? Fluid and electroylyte balance in the elderly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1