Bench test assessment of dosage accuracy and measurement inaccuracy in nitric oxide inhalational therapy during high frequency oscillatory ventilation.

D G Markhorst, T Leenhoven, H R van Genderingen, J W Uiterwijk, A J van Vught
{"title":"Bench test assessment of dosage accuracy and measurement inaccuracy in nitric oxide inhalational therapy during high frequency oscillatory ventilation.","authors":"D G Markhorst,&nbsp;T Leenhoven,&nbsp;H R van Genderingen,&nbsp;J W Uiterwijk,&nbsp;A J van Vught","doi":"10.1023/a:1007476223906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine the accuracy and precision of chemiluminescence and electrochemical nitric oxide (NO) measurements and accuracy of NO dosage with electronic mass flow controllers (MFC) versus rotameters during NO inhalational therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NO flow was delivered to a high frequency oscillator and mixed with ventilator flow. NO and NO2 concentrations were measured simultaneously with a standard chemiluminescence analyzer and a modified electrochemical analyzer. Dosage accuracy was assessed with gas flows adjusted with either MFC's or rotameters. Accuracy of both analyzers was validated with both NO and ventilator flow regulated with a MFC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In dry air, without pulsatile pressure, MFC controlled NO and ventilator flow resulted in an accuracy expressed as the ratio of calculated concentration to measured concentration (RCM) of 0.995 (CI: 0.983-0.988) when measured with chemiluminescence. When the ventilator rotameter was used instead of a MFC, RCM was 0.856 (CI: 0.835-0.877). With a rotameter for both NO and ventilator flow, RCM increased to 1.175 (CI: 0.793-1.740) with an increase of confidence interval limits. Chemiluminescence was sensitive to humidification of the ventilatory gases (p < 0.05), slightly sensitive to the addition of oxygen and to pulsatile pressure (not significant). RCM obtained with the modified electrochemical analyzer was in close agreement with chemiluminescence RCM, although 95% CI were wider with electrochemical analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), standard rotameter flow control of both NO and ventilator flow results in unpredictable NO concentrations that would be clinically unacceptable. When one MFC was used for NO flow control, with ventilator flow controlled with a rotameter, this resulted in moderate dosage accuracy. To achieve a still higher accuracy, MFC flow control for both NO and ventilator flow is indicated. During HFOV, standard chemiluminescence analyzers cannot be considered to be the gold standard for determination of the NO concentration delivered. Measurement of NO concentration may not be mandatory for determination of inhaled NO dose during HFOV, but may be used to monitor for unsafe or unwanted events.</p>","PeriodicalId":77199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical monitoring","volume":"13 6","pages":"349-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1007476223906","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007476223906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the accuracy and precision of chemiluminescence and electrochemical nitric oxide (NO) measurements and accuracy of NO dosage with electronic mass flow controllers (MFC) versus rotameters during NO inhalational therapy.

Methods: NO flow was delivered to a high frequency oscillator and mixed with ventilator flow. NO and NO2 concentrations were measured simultaneously with a standard chemiluminescence analyzer and a modified electrochemical analyzer. Dosage accuracy was assessed with gas flows adjusted with either MFC's or rotameters. Accuracy of both analyzers was validated with both NO and ventilator flow regulated with a MFC.

Results: In dry air, without pulsatile pressure, MFC controlled NO and ventilator flow resulted in an accuracy expressed as the ratio of calculated concentration to measured concentration (RCM) of 0.995 (CI: 0.983-0.988) when measured with chemiluminescence. When the ventilator rotameter was used instead of a MFC, RCM was 0.856 (CI: 0.835-0.877). With a rotameter for both NO and ventilator flow, RCM increased to 1.175 (CI: 0.793-1.740) with an increase of confidence interval limits. Chemiluminescence was sensitive to humidification of the ventilatory gases (p < 0.05), slightly sensitive to the addition of oxygen and to pulsatile pressure (not significant). RCM obtained with the modified electrochemical analyzer was in close agreement with chemiluminescence RCM, although 95% CI were wider with electrochemical analysis.

Conclusions: During high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), standard rotameter flow control of both NO and ventilator flow results in unpredictable NO concentrations that would be clinically unacceptable. When one MFC was used for NO flow control, with ventilator flow controlled with a rotameter, this resulted in moderate dosage accuracy. To achieve a still higher accuracy, MFC flow control for both NO and ventilator flow is indicated. During HFOV, standard chemiluminescence analyzers cannot be considered to be the gold standard for determination of the NO concentration delivered. Measurement of NO concentration may not be mandatory for determination of inhaled NO dose during HFOV, but may be used to monitor for unsafe or unwanted events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高频振荡通气期间一氧化氮吸入治疗剂量准确性和测量不准确性的台架试验评估。
目的:本研究的目的是确定化学发光和电化学测量一氧化氮(NO)的准确性和精密度,以及电子质量流量控制器(MFC)与转子流量计在NO吸入治疗过程中测量NO剂量的准确性。方法:将NO流送入高频振荡器,与通风机流混合。采用标准化学发光分析仪和改进的电化学分析仪同时测量NO和NO2浓度。用MFC或转子流量计调节气体流量来评估剂量准确性。用MFC调节NO和通风机流量,验证了两种分析仪的准确性。结果:在干燥空气中,无脉动压力时,MFC控制NO和通风机流量,化学发光测量精度为计算浓度与测量浓度之比(RCM) 0.995 (CI: 0.983 ~ 0.988)。当使用呼吸机转子表代替MFC时,RCM为0.856 (CI: 0.835-0.877)。同时使用NO和通风机流量的转子流量计时,随着置信区间限的增加,RCM增加到1.175 (CI: 0.793-1.740)。化学发光对通风气体的加湿敏感(p < 0.05),对氧气的添加和脉动压力略有敏感(p < 0.05)。改进的电化学分析仪得到的RCM与化学发光RCM非常接近,尽管电化学分析的95% CI更宽。结论:在高频振荡通气(HFOV)过程中,对NO和呼吸机流量进行标准的转子流量计流量控制会导致不可预测的NO浓度,这在临床上是不可接受的。当一个MFC用于NO流量控制时,用转子流量计控制呼吸机流量,这导致适度的剂量精度。为了达到更高的精度,MFC流量控制同时适用于NO和通风机流量。在HFOV过程中,标准化学发光分析仪不能被认为是测定释放的NO浓度的金标准。在HFOV期间,测量NO浓度可能不是强制性的,但可用于监测不安全或不希望发生的事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thanks to reviewers Pulse oximetry. Abstracts of scientific papers third international symposium on computing in anesthesia Abstracts of scientific papers computers in anesthesia VI Monitoring in Anesthesia, Second Edition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1