Robust sensor fusion improves heart rate estimation: clinical evaluation.

J M Feldman, M H Ebrahim, I Bar-Kana
{"title":"Robust sensor fusion improves heart rate estimation: clinical evaluation.","authors":"J M Feldman,&nbsp;M H Ebrahim,&nbsp;I Bar-Kana","doi":"10.1023/a:1007476707284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if Robust Sensor Fusion (RSF), a method designed to fuse data from multiple sensors with redundant heart rate information can be used to improve the quality of heart rate data. To determine if the improved estimate of heart rate can reduce the number of false and missed heart rate alarms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 85 monitoring periods were investigated, 12 from the operating room, 60 from adult ICU and 13 from pediatric ICU. The operating room periods began with induction of anesthesia and ended at the completion of the anesthetic. For the ICU data, four hour blocks of time were studied. For each monitoring period, HR values were recorded at 5 second intervals or less from the ECG, SpO2 and IAC using a SpaceLabs Medical Gateway connected to a SpaceLabs Medical PC2. Fused estimates of HR were derived for every time point using RSF and all results accepted regardless of confidence value. Data were annotated manually to identify the \"reference\" HR (that HR value most likely to be correct) at all time points. All HR values from the sensors and the fused estimate that were different from the reference HR by more than +/- 5 beats/min were considered inaccurate. For each monitoring period, the total time per hour that data were either inaccurate or unavailable was calculated for each sensor as well as the fused estimates. The total time of false and missed HR alarms was found for all sensors and the fused estimate by comparing the data to thresholds for both high and low HR alarms at 150 bpm, 130 bpm, 110 bpm and 50 bpm, 40 bpm, 30 bpm respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fused estimate of HR was consistently as good or better than the estimate available from any individual sensor. The fused estimates also consistently reduced the incidence of false alarms compared with individual sensors without an unacceptable incidence of missed alarms.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Redundancy in sensor measurements can be used to improve HR estimation in the clinical setting. Methods like RSF which improve the quality of monitored data and reduce nuisance alarms will enhance the value of patient monitors to clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":77199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical monitoring","volume":"13 6","pages":"379-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1007476707284","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007476707284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Objective: To determine if Robust Sensor Fusion (RSF), a method designed to fuse data from multiple sensors with redundant heart rate information can be used to improve the quality of heart rate data. To determine if the improved estimate of heart rate can reduce the number of false and missed heart rate alarms.

Methods: A total of 85 monitoring periods were investigated, 12 from the operating room, 60 from adult ICU and 13 from pediatric ICU. The operating room periods began with induction of anesthesia and ended at the completion of the anesthetic. For the ICU data, four hour blocks of time were studied. For each monitoring period, HR values were recorded at 5 second intervals or less from the ECG, SpO2 and IAC using a SpaceLabs Medical Gateway connected to a SpaceLabs Medical PC2. Fused estimates of HR were derived for every time point using RSF and all results accepted regardless of confidence value. Data were annotated manually to identify the "reference" HR (that HR value most likely to be correct) at all time points. All HR values from the sensors and the fused estimate that were different from the reference HR by more than +/- 5 beats/min were considered inaccurate. For each monitoring period, the total time per hour that data were either inaccurate or unavailable was calculated for each sensor as well as the fused estimates. The total time of false and missed HR alarms was found for all sensors and the fused estimate by comparing the data to thresholds for both high and low HR alarms at 150 bpm, 130 bpm, 110 bpm and 50 bpm, 40 bpm, 30 bpm respectively.

Results: The fused estimate of HR was consistently as good or better than the estimate available from any individual sensor. The fused estimates also consistently reduced the incidence of false alarms compared with individual sensors without an unacceptable incidence of missed alarms.

Discussion: Redundancy in sensor measurements can be used to improve HR estimation in the clinical setting. Methods like RSF which improve the quality of monitored data and reduce nuisance alarms will enhance the value of patient monitors to clinicians.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鲁棒传感器融合改善心率估计:临床评估。
目的:确定鲁棒传感器融合(Robust Sensor Fusion, RSF)是否可以用于提高心率数据的质量。鲁棒传感器融合是一种设计用于融合具有冗余心率信息的多个传感器数据的方法。确定改进的心率估计是否可以减少误报和漏报的次数。方法:共监测85期,其中手术室12期,成人ICU 60期,儿科ICU 13期。手术室时间从麻醉诱导开始到麻醉结束。对于ICU数据,研究了四个小时的时间块。对于每个监测周期,使用连接到SpaceLabs医疗PC2的SpaceLabs医疗网关每隔5秒或更短的时间记录心电图、SpO2和IAC的HR值。使用RSF对每个时间点的HR进行融合估计,无论置信度如何,所有结果都被接受。数据被手工标注,以识别所有时间点的“参考”HR (HR值最有可能是正确的)。所有来自传感器的HR值和融合估计值与参考HR相差超过+/- 5次/分钟被认为是不准确的。对于每个监测期间,计算每个传感器以及融合估计的每小时数据不准确或不可用的总时间。通过将数据与分别为150 bpm、130 bpm、110 bpm和50 bpm、40 bpm、30 bpm的高、低HR报警阈值进行比较,找到所有传感器和融合估计的HR误报和漏报的总时间。结果:HR的融合估计始终与任何单个传感器的估计一样好或更好。与单个传感器相比,融合估计也一致地减少了误报的发生率,而没有不可接受的误报发生率。讨论:冗余传感器测量可用于改善HR估计在临床设置。RSF等方法提高了监测数据的质量,减少了滋扰警报,将提高患者监护仪对临床医生的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thanks to reviewers Pulse oximetry. Abstracts of scientific papers third international symposium on computing in anesthesia Abstracts of scientific papers computers in anesthesia VI Monitoring in Anesthesia, Second Edition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1