P Schandelmaier, C Krettek, A Ungerland, N Reimers, H Tscherne
{"title":"[Pre-bending and and tension adjustment of narrow 4.5 mm AO titanium LC-DCP (limited contact dynamic compression plate)].","authors":"P Schandelmaier, C Krettek, A Ungerland, N Reimers, H Tscherne","doi":"10.1007/s004230050075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>To assess the behavior of the LC-DCP with prebending and pretensioning we tested: gap angle vs. tensioning force without prebending; Bending moment for different prebending angles; In a model using a fiber tube to simulate the bone for different prebending angles and pretensioning forces of the LC-DCP the deformation in 4 point bending open was tested. Maximum prebending angle was 24 degrees, maximum pretensioning force was 2400 N; in human cadaver tibiae angles of 3 degrees, 9 degrees, 24 degrees and forces of 300 N, 1000 N and 1500 N, were tested to look for the difference in a less idealized model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1. A near linear curve for gap angle vs. force with an angle of 0.45 degree/100 N was found between 100 N and 1500 N; 2. We did not find a near linear bending moment/bending angle curve up to 8 degrees like in the DCP but an exponential curve development as it had to be expected by the lower modulus of elasticity of titanium; 3. the maximum mechanical stability was found for a angle of 24 degrees and a force of 1500 N. The titanium LC-DCP shows a different mechanical reaction to prebending and pretensioning in the bone implant complex compared to stul DCP. Optimum prebending and pretensioning for axial compression and mechanical stability in the LC-DCP are by far greater than clinically possible. From our mechanical testing a prebending angle of 24 degrees and a pretensioning force of 1500 N would allow the largest axial compression and show the most resistance against deformation in bending open. In the clinical setting this would result in difficult reduction and therefore, we recommend a prebending angle of 9 degrees and a pretensioning force of 1000 N.</p>","PeriodicalId":17985,"journal":{"name":"Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie","volume":"382 6","pages":"325-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s004230050075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Unlabelled: To assess the behavior of the LC-DCP with prebending and pretensioning we tested: gap angle vs. tensioning force without prebending; Bending moment for different prebending angles; In a model using a fiber tube to simulate the bone for different prebending angles and pretensioning forces of the LC-DCP the deformation in 4 point bending open was tested. Maximum prebending angle was 24 degrees, maximum pretensioning force was 2400 N; in human cadaver tibiae angles of 3 degrees, 9 degrees, 24 degrees and forces of 300 N, 1000 N and 1500 N, were tested to look for the difference in a less idealized model.
Results: 1. A near linear curve for gap angle vs. force with an angle of 0.45 degree/100 N was found between 100 N and 1500 N; 2. We did not find a near linear bending moment/bending angle curve up to 8 degrees like in the DCP but an exponential curve development as it had to be expected by the lower modulus of elasticity of titanium; 3. the maximum mechanical stability was found for a angle of 24 degrees and a force of 1500 N. The titanium LC-DCP shows a different mechanical reaction to prebending and pretensioning in the bone implant complex compared to stul DCP. Optimum prebending and pretensioning for axial compression and mechanical stability in the LC-DCP are by far greater than clinically possible. From our mechanical testing a prebending angle of 24 degrees and a pretensioning force of 1500 N would allow the largest axial compression and show the most resistance against deformation in bending open. In the clinical setting this would result in difficult reduction and therefore, we recommend a prebending angle of 9 degrees and a pretensioning force of 1000 N.