Repopulation of circulating T, B and NK lymphocytes following bone marrow and blood stem cell transplantation.

A Parrado, S Casares, J Prieto, M Carmona, A Vaquero, J M Rodríguez-Fernández
{"title":"Repopulation of circulating T, B and NK lymphocytes following bone marrow and blood stem cell transplantation.","authors":"A Parrado,&nbsp;S Casares,&nbsp;J Prieto,&nbsp;M Carmona,&nbsp;A Vaquero,&nbsp;J M Rodríguez-Fernández","doi":"10.1007/s00282-997-0301-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A variety of T, B and natural killer (NK) cell subsets defined by surface markers were analyzed by double immunofluorescence flow cytometry in the peripheral blood of patients following autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT, n = 14), autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT, n = 10) and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo-BMT, n = 6). Patients following ABMT were divided in 2 groups, those who did not received G-CSF post-transplant (ABMT, n = 6) and those who did (ABMT + G, n = 8). All patients following PBSCT or allo BMT received G-CSF. In all the groups prolonged significant decreases with respect to normal numbers were observed for the T CD3+, CD2+ and CD25+ subsets, more profound for the CD4+ subset but less for the CD8+ subset, especially following PBSCT (only decreased at 1 month). A significant expansion of the CD3+CD57+ and CD8+CD57+ phenotypes was noticed between 9 and 12 months following ABMT, the group of longer follow-up. Long-lasting expansion of the NK-like CD3+CD56+ and CD3+CD16+ subsets was also observed. The B CD19+ and CD20+ subsets had a significant overexpression from 4 months after ABMT, showing a normally balanced Igk+:Ig1+ ratio. Concordantly, the HLA-DR+ and HLA-DQ+ subsets showed significant increases. The NK CD56+ and CD16+ subsets had a faster recovery than the T or B subsets in all the groups. However, the CD3-CD56+, CD3-CD16+, CD16+CD56+, CD3-CD8+, and especially the CD3-CD57+, CD16+CD57+, and CD56+CD57+ subsets had a slower recovery than the global CD56+, CD16+, or CD57+ subsets. The biological and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73231,"journal":{"name":"Hematology and cell therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00282-997-0301-3","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology and cell therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00282-997-0301-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

A variety of T, B and natural killer (NK) cell subsets defined by surface markers were analyzed by double immunofluorescence flow cytometry in the peripheral blood of patients following autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT, n = 14), autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT, n = 10) and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo-BMT, n = 6). Patients following ABMT were divided in 2 groups, those who did not received G-CSF post-transplant (ABMT, n = 6) and those who did (ABMT + G, n = 8). All patients following PBSCT or allo BMT received G-CSF. In all the groups prolonged significant decreases with respect to normal numbers were observed for the T CD3+, CD2+ and CD25+ subsets, more profound for the CD4+ subset but less for the CD8+ subset, especially following PBSCT (only decreased at 1 month). A significant expansion of the CD3+CD57+ and CD8+CD57+ phenotypes was noticed between 9 and 12 months following ABMT, the group of longer follow-up. Long-lasting expansion of the NK-like CD3+CD56+ and CD3+CD16+ subsets was also observed. The B CD19+ and CD20+ subsets had a significant overexpression from 4 months after ABMT, showing a normally balanced Igk+:Ig1+ ratio. Concordantly, the HLA-DR+ and HLA-DQ+ subsets showed significant increases. The NK CD56+ and CD16+ subsets had a faster recovery than the T or B subsets in all the groups. However, the CD3-CD56+, CD3-CD16+, CD16+CD56+, CD3-CD8+, and especially the CD3-CD57+, CD16+CD57+, and CD56+CD57+ subsets had a slower recovery than the global CD56+, CD16+, or CD57+ subsets. The biological and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨髓和造血干细胞移植后循环T、B和NK淋巴细胞的再生。
各种T, B和自然杀伤(NK)细胞表面标记定义的子集被双重免疫荧光流式细胞术分析后患者的外周血自体骨髓移植(ABMT, n = 14)、自体外周血干细胞移植(PBSCT, n = 10)和同种异体骨髓移植(allo-BMT, n = 6)。病人ABMT被分为2组后,那些没有收到g - csf移植后(ABMT,n = 6)和ABMT + G组(n = 8)。所有接受PBSCT或允许BMT的患者均接受G- csf。在所有组中,T - CD3+、CD2+和CD25+亚群相对于正常数量的持续显著下降,CD4+亚群的下降幅度更大,但CD8+亚群的下降幅度较小,特别是在PBSCT之后(仅在1个月时下降)。在随访时间较长的ABMT组,CD3+CD57+和CD8+CD57+表型显著扩增。nk样CD3+CD56+和CD3+CD16+亚群的长期扩增也被观察到。ABMT后4个月,B CD19+和CD20+亚群显著过表达,Igk+:Ig1+比例正常平衡。与此同时,HLA-DR+和HLA-DQ+亚群明显增加。NK CD56+和CD16+亚群比T或B亚群恢复更快。然而,CD3-CD56+、CD3-CD16+、CD16+CD56+、CD3-CD8+,特别是CD3-CD57+、CD16+CD57+和CD56+CD57+亚群的恢复速度比全局CD56+、CD16+或CD57+亚群慢。讨论了这些发现的生物学和临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Allogeneic bone marrow tranplantation for young adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: HLA-Matched sibling donor availability does not improve treatment ouctome Imbalance between the number of patients supplying stem cells for autologous transplantation and the number of patients receiving such transplants in France in 1997 and 1998 Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR) a report of the BGMT cooperative group about 32 patients VECP-Bleo regimen as treatment of advanced stage aggressive non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in elderly patients a GOELAMS protocol Cost analysis of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1