Why do homosexual men continue to practise unsafe sex? A critical review of a qualitative research paper.

K A Fenton, R Power
{"title":"Why do homosexual men continue to practise unsafe sex? A critical review of a qualitative research paper.","authors":"K A Fenton, R Power","doi":"10.1136/sti.73.5.404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction techniques usingindepthquestioning inindividual interviews andfocused group discussions are particularly suited to exploring thefactors thatinfluence behaviour. Qualitative researchers studyphenomenaand eventsintheir natural settings, often interpretingthemintermsofthesubjective meanings attached bytheindividual. Thisapproach is unique initsability toprovide a greater understanding ofthefull rangeofexperiences and attitudes. Incontrastwiththedeductive predominanceof most quantitative research, qualitative research tendsto beinductivethatis, usesempirical datatobuildup a pictureandunderstanding ofthephenomenon beingresearched. Indeedmany ofthecomputerpackages thatare now usedforthe analysis ofqualitative dataare basedon the inductive framework whichusesdatatogenerate hypotheses and buildtheories-a \"grounded theory\" approach. Qualitative techniques can alsoidentify issuesand concepts;clarify language and meaning;and explore perceptions, experiences,attitudes, andbehaviour. Withappropriate sampleselection, thesefactors can be investigated intermsofdifferences andsimilarities betweenindividuals, aswell asaddressingthecomplexities ofindividual experience. Itisparticularly appropriate forexploration of sensitive topics, thesuccessofwhichdepends on building rapportandgaining theconfidenceoftherespondent. Sexual health isperhaps one areawherethe complementary use ofqualitative andquantitative research methodsisbestillustrated. Qualitative research hascontributed greatly to our understanding ofsexual behaviours and lifestyles, safer sexpractice, andunderstanding process issuesinbehavioural interventions. Qualitative andquantitative research may be usedto investigate similar topics although eachwilladdress a different typeofquestion. Forexample, inrelation tosexual behaviour, a quantitative study can determine thedistributionanddeterminants ofmultiple sexual partnerships among a group ofrespondents. A qualitative approach, on theotherhand, wouldbe more appropriate to explore conceptssurrounding choice ofpartners, nuances ofbehaviours, andsociocultural factors associatedwiththeadoption ofthislifestyle. Inthis article we illustrate howtocritically reviewqualitative research findings usinga critical appraisal checklist whichcompiles a numberofkeyassessmentcriteria (seetable 1).Thesecriteria willbeapplied toan article whichexamines homosexual men'sexplanationsforengaging inunprotected analintercourse.' Eachofthefollowing sections relates tothepoints obtained inthecritical appraisal checklist.","PeriodicalId":12621,"journal":{"name":"Genitourinary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/sti.73.5.404","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genitourinary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.73.5.404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction techniques usingindepthquestioning inindividual interviews andfocused group discussions are particularly suited to exploring thefactors thatinfluence behaviour. Qualitative researchers studyphenomenaand eventsintheir natural settings, often interpretingthemintermsofthesubjective meanings attached bytheindividual. Thisapproach is unique initsability toprovide a greater understanding ofthefull rangeofexperiences and attitudes. Incontrastwiththedeductive predominanceof most quantitative research, qualitative research tendsto beinductivethatis, usesempirical datatobuildup a pictureandunderstanding ofthephenomenon beingresearched. Indeedmany ofthecomputerpackages thatare now usedforthe analysis ofqualitative dataare basedon the inductive framework whichusesdatatogenerate hypotheses and buildtheories-a "grounded theory" approach. Qualitative techniques can alsoidentify issuesand concepts;clarify language and meaning;and explore perceptions, experiences,attitudes, andbehaviour. Withappropriate sampleselection, thesefactors can be investigated intermsofdifferences andsimilarities betweenindividuals, aswell asaddressingthecomplexities ofindividual experience. Itisparticularly appropriate forexploration of sensitive topics, thesuccessofwhichdepends on building rapportandgaining theconfidenceoftherespondent. Sexual health isperhaps one areawherethe complementary use ofqualitative andquantitative research methodsisbestillustrated. Qualitative research hascontributed greatly to our understanding ofsexual behaviours and lifestyles, safer sexpractice, andunderstanding process issuesinbehavioural interventions. Qualitative andquantitative research may be usedto investigate similar topics although eachwilladdress a different typeofquestion. Forexample, inrelation tosexual behaviour, a quantitative study can determine thedistributionanddeterminants ofmultiple sexual partnerships among a group ofrespondents. A qualitative approach, on theotherhand, wouldbe more appropriate to explore conceptssurrounding choice ofpartners, nuances ofbehaviours, andsociocultural factors associatedwiththeadoption ofthislifestyle. Inthis article we illustrate howtocritically reviewqualitative research findings usinga critical appraisal checklist whichcompiles a numberofkeyassessmentcriteria (seetable 1).Thesecriteria willbeapplied toan article whichexamines homosexual men'sexplanationsforengaging inunprotected analintercourse.' Eachofthefollowing sections relates tothepoints obtained inthecritical appraisal checklist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么男同性恋者继续进行不安全的性行为?对定性研究论文的批判性评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Behavioural and demographic characteristics of attenders at two genitourinary medicine clinics in England. Necrotising herpetic retinopathy in patients with advance HIV disease. Herpes zoster and the stage and prognosis of HIV-1 infection. Prior fluconazole exposure as an independent risk factor for fluconazole resistant candidosis in HIV positive patients: a case-control study. Women with recurrent vaginal candidosis have normal peripheral blood B and T lymphocyte subset levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1