J L Figuerido, M Gutiérrez, A González Pinto, J Ballesteros, F Ramírez, E Elizagarate, R González Oliveros, P López, J L Pérez de Heredia
{"title":"[Positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia: standards of change during acute exacerbation].","authors":"J L Figuerido, M Gutiérrez, A González Pinto, J Ballesteros, F Ramírez, E Elizagarate, R González Oliveros, P López, J L Pérez de Heredia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>The temporal stability of the positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia deserves a special interest due to its consequences in the outcome and the treatment of the disease. This study determines the temporal stability of positive/negative subtypes in schizophrenia during the acute phase.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is a clinical, observational and prospective study of a dynamic cohort of patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia defined by DSM III-R criteria. Patients with severe and unstable organic pathology, substance dependence, mental organic disorder, mental retardation, depression, or medicamentous parkinsonism were excluded. Clinical assessment was performed with the PANSS scale. Schizophrenic subtypes were established according to inclusive and restrictive criteria of PANSS. All patients were treated with new antipsycotics and biperiden if necessary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>51 patients were assessed for 8 weeks. In the baseline, the negative subtype (63.3% and 52.5% by inclusive and restrictive system respectively) and paranoid form (45.1%) were predominant. Three types of analysis were performed to determine the temporal stability: 1. Concordance (Kappa index). The concordance of the inclusive and restrictive System, regarding to the baseline assessment, indicated that both criteria had a low temporal stability. 2. Mc Nemar Ji Square. This test showed that these changes were bi-directional except for the first visit, which was significant through the restrictive system (higher change from the negative to other subtypes). 3. Transition analysis among groups by First Order Morkov Chains analysis indicated that this change was stationary (the change was the same in all phases).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>1o The variable \"time\" has to be considered for the definition of subtypes in schizophrenia. 2o The restrictive system is more specific. It allows to identify a subgroup of patients with \"Negative\" schizophrenia with a high specificity and validity in clinical and epidemiological studies. 3o The use of the baseline visit as a reference (gold standard) is recommended because it exits a higher concordance among criteria and a more florid psychopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":75429,"journal":{"name":"Actas luso-espanolas de neurologia, psiquiatria y ciencias afines","volume":"25 5","pages":"295-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas luso-espanolas de neurologia, psiquiatria y ciencias afines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: The temporal stability of the positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia deserves a special interest due to its consequences in the outcome and the treatment of the disease. This study determines the temporal stability of positive/negative subtypes in schizophrenia during the acute phase.
Material and methods: This is a clinical, observational and prospective study of a dynamic cohort of patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia defined by DSM III-R criteria. Patients with severe and unstable organic pathology, substance dependence, mental organic disorder, mental retardation, depression, or medicamentous parkinsonism were excluded. Clinical assessment was performed with the PANSS scale. Schizophrenic subtypes were established according to inclusive and restrictive criteria of PANSS. All patients were treated with new antipsycotics and biperiden if necessary.
Results: 51 patients were assessed for 8 weeks. In the baseline, the negative subtype (63.3% and 52.5% by inclusive and restrictive system respectively) and paranoid form (45.1%) were predominant. Three types of analysis were performed to determine the temporal stability: 1. Concordance (Kappa index). The concordance of the inclusive and restrictive System, regarding to the baseline assessment, indicated that both criteria had a low temporal stability. 2. Mc Nemar Ji Square. This test showed that these changes were bi-directional except for the first visit, which was significant through the restrictive system (higher change from the negative to other subtypes). 3. Transition analysis among groups by First Order Morkov Chains analysis indicated that this change was stationary (the change was the same in all phases).
Conclusions: 1o The variable "time" has to be considered for the definition of subtypes in schizophrenia. 2o The restrictive system is more specific. It allows to identify a subgroup of patients with "Negative" schizophrenia with a high specificity and validity in clinical and epidemiological studies. 3o The use of the baseline visit as a reference (gold standard) is recommended because it exits a higher concordance among criteria and a more florid psychopathology.
前言和目标:精神分裂症阳性和阴性症状的时间稳定性值得特别关注,因为它对该疾病的结果和治疗产生影响。本研究确定了精神分裂症急性期阳性/阴性亚型的时间稳定性。材料和方法:这是一项针对DSM III-R标准定义的精神分裂症急性加重患者的动态队列的临床、观察和前瞻性研究。排除有严重和不稳定器质性病理、物质依赖、精神器质性障碍、智力低下、抑郁症或药物性帕金森病的患者。采用PANSS量表进行临床评估。根据PANSS的包容性和限制性标准建立精神分裂症亚型。所有患者均使用新型抗精神病药物治疗,必要时使用双哌啶。结果:51例患者随访8周。基线时,阴性亚型(包容型和限制性型分别为63.3%和52.5%)和偏执型(45.1%)为主。为了确定时间稳定性,我们进行了三种分析:一致性(Kappa指数)。关于基线评估,包容性和限制性系统的一致性表明,这两个标准都具有较低的时间稳定性。2. Mc Nemar Ji广场。该测试表明,除了第一次就诊外,这些变化是双向的,通过限制性系统(从阴性到其他亚型的变化更高),这些变化是显著的。3.一阶Morkov链分析各组间的过渡分析表明,这种变化是平稳的(各阶段变化相同)。结论:10在定义精神分裂症亚型时,必须考虑变量“时间”。限制性制度更具体。它允许在临床和流行病学研究中识别具有高特异性和有效性的“阴性”精神分裂症患者亚组。建议使用基线访问作为参考(金标准),因为它在标准和更丰富的精神病理学之间存在更高的一致性。