K.J Bruin , J.L Kenemans , M.N Verbaten , A.H.C Van der Heijden
{"title":"Localization of spatial attention processes with the aid of a probe technique","authors":"K.J Bruin , J.L Kenemans , M.N Verbaten , A.H.C Van der Heijden","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00097-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A sudden visual onset is thought to `attract attention to its location' within less than 100 ms. We attempted to measure the effect of this attentional process on the event-related potential (ERP) to a probe presented about 140 ms after the onset, and to delineate the spatio-temporal characteristics of such an effect, if any. ERPs were recorded from 30 channels from 6 subjects while they performed a target detection task. Both targets and probes could be located in each of the 4 quadrants (eccentricities 6.1° and 7°, respectively). For a given single target, the subsequent probe was either presented near the location of the target (`valid target') or at the diagonal opposite (`invalid target'). Appropriate `neutral' conditions (probes preceded by no target, or by simultaneous targets in all quadrants) were applied, and ERPs to probes were corrected for the contribution of the ERPs to targets. The earliest effect of (in)validity was found at about 120 ms after probe onset for lower field probes. This effect consisted of enhanced posterior positivity for valid relative to neutral relative to invalid conditions. This positivity was superposed on a contralateral, extrastriate negative ongoing wave peaking at about 150 ms (`N150'). Source localization suggested that the (in)validity effects originate from deep medial parietal areas. The source corresponding to the N150 activity was not influenced by (in)validity. An earlier deflection to the probe at 80 ms (`NP80') depended on location, but not on (in)validity, and seemed to be of striate origin. Results are discussed in terms of a model postulating an attention-independent `input module' from which activation is fed to a `location module' embodying the actual attention mechanism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"108 2","pages":"Pages 110-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00097-X","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016855979700097X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Abstract
A sudden visual onset is thought to `attract attention to its location' within less than 100 ms. We attempted to measure the effect of this attentional process on the event-related potential (ERP) to a probe presented about 140 ms after the onset, and to delineate the spatio-temporal characteristics of such an effect, if any. ERPs were recorded from 30 channels from 6 subjects while they performed a target detection task. Both targets and probes could be located in each of the 4 quadrants (eccentricities 6.1° and 7°, respectively). For a given single target, the subsequent probe was either presented near the location of the target (`valid target') or at the diagonal opposite (`invalid target'). Appropriate `neutral' conditions (probes preceded by no target, or by simultaneous targets in all quadrants) were applied, and ERPs to probes were corrected for the contribution of the ERPs to targets. The earliest effect of (in)validity was found at about 120 ms after probe onset for lower field probes. This effect consisted of enhanced posterior positivity for valid relative to neutral relative to invalid conditions. This positivity was superposed on a contralateral, extrastriate negative ongoing wave peaking at about 150 ms (`N150'). Source localization suggested that the (in)validity effects originate from deep medial parietal areas. The source corresponding to the N150 activity was not influenced by (in)validity. An earlier deflection to the probe at 80 ms (`NP80') depended on location, but not on (in)validity, and seemed to be of striate origin. Results are discussed in terms of a model postulating an attention-independent `input module' from which activation is fed to a `location module' embodying the actual attention mechanism.
在不到100毫秒的时间内,突然出现的视觉被认为是“将注意力吸引到它的位置”。我们试图测量这一注意过程对事件相关电位(ERP)的影响,并在事件发生约140毫秒后向探针呈现,并描绘这种影响的时空特征,如果有的话。记录6名受试者在执行目标检测任务时30个通道的erp。目标和探针都可以定位在4个象限中的每一个(偏心度分别为6.1°和7°)。对于给定的单个目标,后续探针要么在目标位置附近(“有效目标”)呈现,要么在对角线对面(“无效目标”)呈现。应用适当的“中性”条件(探针之前没有目标,或在所有象限中同时有目标),并且对探针的erp进行校正,以确定erp对目标的贡献。对于低场探针,最早的效度效应在探针开始后约120毫秒被发现。这种效应包括有效条件相对于中性条件相对于无效条件的后验正性增强。这一阳性信号叠加在对侧、脑外负持续波上,峰值约为150 ms (' N150')。来源定位提示,效度效应来源于内侧顶叶深部。N150活性对应的源不受效度的影响。探测器在80毫秒时的早期偏转(' NP80')取决于位置,而不是(在)有效性,并且似乎是纹状起源。研究结果根据一个模型进行了讨论,该模型假设了一个独立于注意力的“输入模块”,激活从该模块被提供给一个体现实际注意力机制的“位置模块”。