Dissociation induced by voluntary movement between two different components of the centro-parietal P40 SEP to tibial nerve stimulation

Massimiliano Valeriani , Domenico Restuccia , Vincenzo Di Lazzaro , Carmen Barba , Domenica Le Pera , Pietro Tonali
{"title":"Dissociation induced by voluntary movement between two different components of the centro-parietal P40 SEP to tibial nerve stimulation","authors":"Massimiliano Valeriani ,&nbsp;Domenico Restuccia ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Di Lazzaro ,&nbsp;Carmen Barba ,&nbsp;Domenica Le Pera ,&nbsp;Pietro Tonali","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00079-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Whether the two earliest cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to </span>tibial nerve stimulation (N37 and P40) are generated by the same dipolar source or, instead, originate from different neuronal populations is still a debated problem. We recorded the early scalp SEPs to tibial nerve stimulation in 10 healthy subjects at rest and during voluntary movement of the stimulated foot. We found that the P40, which reached its highest amplitude on the vertex at rest, changed its topography during movement, since its amplitude was reduced much more in the central than in the parietal traces. These findings suggest that two different components contribute to the centro-parietal positivity at rest: (1) the P37 response, which is parietally distributed and is not modified by movement, and (2) the `real' P40 SEP, which is focused on the vertex and is reduced in amplitude during voluntary movement. Since, also, the N37 response did not vary its amplitude under interference condition, it is possible that the N37 and P37 potentials are generated by the same dipolar source. Other later components, namely P50 and N50, were significantly reduced in amplitude during foot movement. Lastly, the subcortical P30 far-field remained unchanged and this suggests that the phenomenon of amplitude reduction during movement (i.e. gating) occurs above the cervico-medullary junction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"108 2","pages":"Pages 190-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00079-8","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559797000798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Whether the two earliest cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to tibial nerve stimulation (N37 and P40) are generated by the same dipolar source or, instead, originate from different neuronal populations is still a debated problem. We recorded the early scalp SEPs to tibial nerve stimulation in 10 healthy subjects at rest and during voluntary movement of the stimulated foot. We found that the P40, which reached its highest amplitude on the vertex at rest, changed its topography during movement, since its amplitude was reduced much more in the central than in the parietal traces. These findings suggest that two different components contribute to the centro-parietal positivity at rest: (1) the P37 response, which is parietally distributed and is not modified by movement, and (2) the `real' P40 SEP, which is focused on the vertex and is reduced in amplitude during voluntary movement. Since, also, the N37 response did not vary its amplitude under interference condition, it is possible that the N37 and P37 potentials are generated by the same dipolar source. Other later components, namely P50 and N50, were significantly reduced in amplitude during foot movement. Lastly, the subcortical P30 far-field remained unchanged and this suggests that the phenomenon of amplitude reduction during movement (i.e. gating) occurs above the cervico-medullary junction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胫骨神经刺激引起的中央-顶叶p40sep的两个不同组分之间的随意运动引起的解离
两个最早的皮质体感诱发电位(SEPs)对胫骨神经的刺激(N37和P40)是由相同的偶极源产生的,还是来自不同的神经元群仍然是一个有争议的问题。我们记录了10名健康受试者在休息和受刺激足自主运动时对胫神经刺激的早期头皮电位。我们发现,P40在静止时在顶点达到最高振幅,在运动过程中改变了它的地形,因为它的振幅在中央比在顶叶迹减少得更多。这些发现表明,两种不同的成分有助于静止时的中央-顶叶正性:(1)P37反应,它是顶叶分布的,不受运动的影响;(2)“真正的”P40 SEP,它集中在顶点,在自主运动时振幅降低。由于在干扰条件下,N37响应的振幅没有变化,因此N37和P37电位可能是由同一个偶极源产生的。其他后期成分,即P50和N50,在足部运动过程中振幅显著降低。最后,皮层下P30远场保持不变,这表明运动过程中的振幅降低现象(即门控)发生在颈髓交界处以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual Evoked Potentials Clinical Evoked Potentials: An Illustrated Manual Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Motor Evoked Potentials Cochlear implant performance and electrically-evoked auditory brain-stem response characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1