Relationships among HIV risk beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors in sexually active, seronegative gay men.

NursingConnections Pub Date : 1998-01-01
K D Phillips, R L Sowell, T R Misener
{"title":"Relationships among HIV risk beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors in sexually active, seronegative gay men.","authors":"K D Phillips,&nbsp;R L Sowell,&nbsp;T R Misener","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safer-sex guidelines established during the early days of the HIV/AIDS epidemic have undergone very little revision despite some controversy. Although these guidelines have been widely disseminated in the gay community, many gay men continue to engage in behaviors that are believed to put them at high risk for transmission of HIV. This suggests either that they have not accepted safer-sex guidelines as accurate or that other factors override personal implementation of the guidelines. The study examined seronegative gay men's beliefs about the accuracy of safer sex guidelines and the men's participation in behaviors risky for transmitting HIV. The greatest disagreement between the men's beliefs and behaviors centered on the risk of oral intercourse; this suggests a need for clarification of the safer sex message about this behavior. The findings of this study support the need to reformulate safer-sex guidelines. When unprotected oral and anal sex are classified at the same level of risk, those who engage in unprotected oral sex may proceed to unprotected anal sex with less reservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":77304,"journal":{"name":"NursingConnections","volume":"11 1","pages":"5-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NursingConnections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safer-sex guidelines established during the early days of the HIV/AIDS epidemic have undergone very little revision despite some controversy. Although these guidelines have been widely disseminated in the gay community, many gay men continue to engage in behaviors that are believed to put them at high risk for transmission of HIV. This suggests either that they have not accepted safer-sex guidelines as accurate or that other factors override personal implementation of the guidelines. The study examined seronegative gay men's beliefs about the accuracy of safer sex guidelines and the men's participation in behaviors risky for transmitting HIV. The greatest disagreement between the men's beliefs and behaviors centered on the risk of oral intercourse; this suggests a need for clarification of the safer sex message about this behavior. The findings of this study support the need to reformulate safer-sex guidelines. When unprotected oral and anal sex are classified at the same level of risk, those who engage in unprotected oral sex may proceed to unprotected anal sex with less reservation.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性活跃、血清阴性的男同性恋者的艾滋病毒风险信念、态度和行为之间的关系
尽管存在一些争议,但在艾滋病毒/艾滋病流行初期制定的安全性行为准则几乎没有经过修订。尽管这些指导方针已经在同性恋群体中广泛传播,但许多男同性恋者继续从事被认为将他们置于艾滋病毒传播高风险的行为。这表明,要么他们不认为安全性行为指南是准确的,要么其他因素凌驾于个人对指南的执行之上。该研究调查了血清检测呈阴性的男同性恋者对安全性行为指南准确性的看法,以及他们参与有传播艾滋病毒风险的行为的态度。男性的信念和行为之间最大的分歧集中在口交的风险上;这表明有必要澄清关于这种行为的安全性行为信息。这项研究的发现支持了重新制定安全性行为指南的必要性。当无保护的口交和肛交被列为相同的风险水平时,那些进行无保护的口交的人可能会更少地进行无保护的肛交。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lessons, Part I. “WHO’S THAT KNOCKING AT MY DOOR?”: Spirituality and prayer: a new age paradigm for ethics. Role clarity, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction during hospital reengineering. Baccalaureate nursing education and home health: a collaborative alliance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1