Diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection in HIV-infected patients with respiratory disease

Rafael E de la Hoz , Sean K Byrne , Shizu Hayashi , Christopher Sherlock , Darrel Cook , James C. Hogg
{"title":"Diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection in HIV-infected patients with respiratory disease","authors":"Rafael E de la Hoz ,&nbsp;Sean K Byrne ,&nbsp;Shizu Hayashi ,&nbsp;Christopher Sherlock ,&nbsp;Darrel Cook ,&nbsp;James C. Hogg","doi":"10.1016/S0928-0197(98)00020-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> The role of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) in the respiratory morbidity and mortality of HIV-infected patients remains unclear. This is due in part to difficulties in making an accurate and rapid diagnosis. There has been a limited number of studies, often with few or no AIDS patients, on the use of DNA–DNA in situ hybridization (ISH) and polymerase chain reaction to diagnose CMV respiratory infection directly on bronchoalveolar fluid samples.</p><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To compare the centrifugation culture (CC), ISH, and nested-primer polymerase chain reaction (npPCR) techniques on bronchoalveolar fluid for the diagnosis of respiratory CMV infection.</p><p><strong>Study design:</strong> Samples were obtained prospectively from a group of 35 HIV-infected homosexual men evaluated for pneumonia at a university hospital. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the three techniques were measured and compared, using the conventional roller tube cell culture (CRTC) as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were as follows: 86%, 86%, 90%, and 80% for the CC; 5%, 100%, 100%, and 41% for ISH; and 86%, 57%, 75%, and 73% for npPCR. Of the six false positive samples by npPCR, two were positive by CC (none by ISH). If the latter were considered true positives, the specificity and positive predictive values of npPCR would increase to 67% and 83%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> CC appeared to be the best of the three techniques compared in this study for diagnosis of respiratory CMV infection in HIV-infected patients. The sensitivity and predictive values of DNA–DNA ISH were very poor. Results with npPCR were acceptable, and this technique may be considered in situations when rapid diagnosis of CMV infection is necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79479,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and diagnostic virology","volume":"10 1","pages":"Pages 1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0928-0197(98)00020-8","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and diagnostic virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928019798000208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The role of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) in the respiratory morbidity and mortality of HIV-infected patients remains unclear. This is due in part to difficulties in making an accurate and rapid diagnosis. There has been a limited number of studies, often with few or no AIDS patients, on the use of DNA–DNA in situ hybridization (ISH) and polymerase chain reaction to diagnose CMV respiratory infection directly on bronchoalveolar fluid samples.

Objectives: To compare the centrifugation culture (CC), ISH, and nested-primer polymerase chain reaction (npPCR) techniques on bronchoalveolar fluid for the diagnosis of respiratory CMV infection.

Study design: Samples were obtained prospectively from a group of 35 HIV-infected homosexual men evaluated for pneumonia at a university hospital. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the three techniques were measured and compared, using the conventional roller tube cell culture (CRTC) as the gold standard.

Results: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were as follows: 86%, 86%, 90%, and 80% for the CC; 5%, 100%, 100%, and 41% for ISH; and 86%, 57%, 75%, and 73% for npPCR. Of the six false positive samples by npPCR, two were positive by CC (none by ISH). If the latter were considered true positives, the specificity and positive predictive values of npPCR would increase to 67% and 83%, respectively.

Conclusions: CC appeared to be the best of the three techniques compared in this study for diagnosis of respiratory CMV infection in HIV-infected patients. The sensitivity and predictive values of DNA–DNA ISH were very poor. Results with npPCR were acceptable, and this technique may be considered in situations when rapid diagnosis of CMV infection is necessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
hiv感染呼吸道疾病患者巨细胞病毒感染的诊断
背景:巨细胞病毒(CMV)在hiv感染患者呼吸道疾病和死亡率中的作用尚不清楚。这部分是由于难以作出准确和迅速的诊断。使用DNA-DNA原位杂交(ISH)和聚合酶链反应直接在支气管肺泡液样本上诊断巨细胞病毒呼吸道感染的研究数量有限,通常很少或没有艾滋病患者。目的:比较支气管肺泡液离心培养(CC)、ISH和巢式引物聚合酶链反应(npPCR)技术对呼吸道巨细胞病毒感染的诊断价值。研究设计:前瞻性地从一组在大学医院接受肺炎评估的35名感染艾滋病毒的同性恋男子中获得样本。以常规滚管细胞培养(CRTC)为金标准,测量和比较三种技术的灵敏度、特异性和预测值。结果:敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为:CC的86%、86%、90%和80%;5%, 100%, 100%, 41%为ISH;npPCR分别为86%、57%、75%和73%。npPCR假阳性6例,CC阳性2例(ISH阴性)。如果后者被认为是真阳性,npPCR的特异性和阳性预测值将分别提高到67%和83%。结论:CC似乎是本研究中比较的三种技术中诊断hiv感染患者呼吸道巨细胞病毒感染的最佳技术。DNA-DNA ISH的敏感性和预测价值都很差。npPCR的结果是可以接受的,在需要快速诊断巨细胞病毒感染的情况下,可以考虑使用这种技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Immune mediated and inherited defences against flaviviruses Maternal recognition of foetal infection with bovine virus diarrhoea virus (BVDV)—the bovine pestivirus The conformation of hepatitis C virus NS3 proteinase with and without NS4A: a structural basis for the activation of the enzyme by its cofactor Repression of the PKR protein kinase by the hepatitis C virus NS5A protein: a potential mechanism of interferon resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1