The repeatability and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrodes.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 1997-11-01
N Mohidin, M K Yap, R J Jacobs
{"title":"The repeatability and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrodes.","authors":"N Mohidin,&nbsp;M K Yap,&nbsp;R J Jacobs","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multifocal electroretinograms were recorded from twelve subjects on three separate days using the Visual Evoked Response Imaging System (VERIS). The subjects were 18-40 years-of-age. Each recording session was separated by an interval of between one and 16 weeks. Four electrode types were compared: the JET contact lens electrode, the gold foil electrode, the DTL thread electrode and the carbon fibre (c-glide) electrode. The b-wave amplitude density (nV/sq.deg) recorded with each electrode was measured. The mean amplitude density recorded at each session for each subject and each electrode was calculated and compared. There were no significant differences in amplitude density for the ERGs recorded with each type of electrode over the three days. The coefficient of variation for each electrode and each subject was then calculated using the results for the three days. The coefficients of variation for each electrode showed significant differences (One-way ANOVA: F = 4.51, d.f. = 3.44, P < 0.008). The c-glide electrode results had the highest variability and post hoc tests showed that its coefficient of variation was significantly different from those of the JET and gold foil electrodes but not from that of the DTL thread electrode.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":"17 6","pages":"530-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multifocal electroretinograms were recorded from twelve subjects on three separate days using the Visual Evoked Response Imaging System (VERIS). The subjects were 18-40 years-of-age. Each recording session was separated by an interval of between one and 16 weeks. Four electrode types were compared: the JET contact lens electrode, the gold foil electrode, the DTL thread electrode and the carbon fibre (c-glide) electrode. The b-wave amplitude density (nV/sq.deg) recorded with each electrode was measured. The mean amplitude density recorded at each session for each subject and each electrode was calculated and compared. There were no significant differences in amplitude density for the ERGs recorded with each type of electrode over the three days. The coefficient of variation for each electrode and each subject was then calculated using the results for the three days. The coefficients of variation for each electrode showed significant differences (One-way ANOVA: F = 4.51, d.f. = 3.44, P < 0.008). The c-glide electrode results had the highest variability and post hoc tests showed that its coefficient of variation was significantly different from those of the JET and gold foil electrodes but not from that of the DTL thread electrode.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种不同电极的多焦视网膜电图的重复性和可变性。
使用视觉诱发反应成像系统(VERIS)记录12名受试者3天的多焦视网膜电图。受试者年龄在18-40岁之间。每次录音时间间隔为1到16周。比较了四种电极类型:JET隐形眼镜电极、金箔电极、DTL螺纹电极和碳纤维(c-glide)电极。测量每个电极记录的b波振幅密度(nV/平方度)。计算并比较每个受试者和每个电极在每次会话中记录的平均振幅密度。在三天内,每种类型的电极记录的eeg振幅密度没有显著差异。然后使用三天的结果计算每个电极和每个受试者的变异系数。各电极变异系数差异有统计学意义(单因素方差分析:F = 4.51, df = 3.44, P < 0.008)。c-glide电极结果的变异系数最高,事后检验表明其变异系数与JET和金箔电极差异显著,但与DTL螺纹电极差异不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of proliferative diabetic retinopathy using machine learning in Latino and non-Hispanic black cohorts with routine blood and urine testing. Analysing diagnostic practices and referral pathways for glaucoma in Australian primary eye care. Corneal aberrations and anterior segment parameters in preterm children with or without a history of retinopathy of prematurity. Binocular instability (fusional vergence dysfunction) and ADHD. Authors' Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1