Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

Dag Arvidsson, Ulf Berggren, Ulf Haglund
{"title":"Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration","authors":"Dag Arvidsson,&nbsp;Ulf Berggren,&nbsp;Ulf Haglund","doi":"10.1080/110241598750004409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective:</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the feasibility of laparoscopic techniques for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design:</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting:</h3>\n \n <p>University hospital, Sweden.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Subjects:</h3>\n \n <p>39 patients who underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, either by a transcystic technique or by choledochotomy, between September 1992 and April 1995.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interventions:</h3>\n \n <p>Cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography, and removal of CBD-stones by a transcystic technique (<i>n</i> = 22), laparoscopic choledocholithotomy (<i>n</i> = 11), or after conversion to open choledocholithotomy (<i>n</i> = 6).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures:</h3>\n \n <p>Stone clearance rates, operative time, complications, and postoperative hospital stay.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results:</h3>\n \n <p>Stone removal was achieved in 32/39 patients (82%) by a laparoscopic approach. Reasons for failure were early in our experience, and the result of technical difficulties or stones that were too large for the transcystic approach, or with impacted stones at choledochotomy. Postoperative morbidity was low (<i>n</i> = 4, 10%) with no mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions:</h3>\n \n <p>Common bile duct stones can be removed in a large proportion of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, either by a laparoscopic transcystic technique or through a laparoscopic choledochotomy. The laparoscopic techniques need further evaluation, preferably in prospective multicentre trials comparing other treatment strategies including endoscopic sphincterotomy. Copyright © 1998 Taylor and Francis Ltd.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100508,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Surgery","volume":"164 5","pages":"369-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241598750004409","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/110241598750004409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Objective:

To explore the feasibility of laparoscopic techniques for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones.

Design:

Retrospective analysis.

Setting:

University hospital, Sweden.

Subjects:

39 patients who underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, either by a transcystic technique or by choledochotomy, between September 1992 and April 1995.

Interventions:

Cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography, and removal of CBD-stones by a transcystic technique (n = 22), laparoscopic choledocholithotomy (n = 11), or after conversion to open choledocholithotomy (n = 6).

Main outcome measures:

Stone clearance rates, operative time, complications, and postoperative hospital stay.

Results:

Stone removal was achieved in 32/39 patients (82%) by a laparoscopic approach. Reasons for failure were early in our experience, and the result of technical difficulties or stones that were too large for the transcystic approach, or with impacted stones at choledochotomy. Postoperative morbidity was low (n = 4, 10%) with no mortality.

Conclusions:

Common bile duct stones can be removed in a large proportion of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, either by a laparoscopic transcystic technique or through a laparoscopic choledochotomy. The laparoscopic techniques need further evaluation, preferably in prospective multicentre trials comparing other treatment strategies including endoscopic sphincterotomy. Copyright © 1998 Taylor and Francis Ltd.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胆总管探查
目的:探讨腹腔镜下胆总管结石切除术的可行性。设计:回顾性分析。地点:瑞典大学医院。研究对象:1992年9月至1995年4月期间,39例经胆囊技术或胆道切开术行腹腔镜胆总管探查的患者。干预措施:胆囊切除术、术中胆道造影、经囊技术取出cbd结石(n = 22)、腹腔镜胆总管取石术(n = 11)或转换为开放式胆总管取石术后取出cbd结石(n = 6)。主要结局指标:结石清除率、手术时间、并发症和术后住院时间。结果:39例患者中有32例(82%)通过腹腔镜手术切除了结石。在我们的经验中,失败的原因是早期的,并且是由于技术困难或结石太大而不能经膀胱入路,或在胆道切开术中有结石的影响。术后发病率低(n = 4.10%),无死亡率。结论:行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中,有很大一部分可以通过腹腔镜经囊技术或腹腔镜胆总管切开术切除胆总管结石。腹腔镜技术需要进一步评估,最好在前瞻性多中心试验中比较其他治疗策略,包括内镜下括约肌切开术。版权所有©1998 Taylor and Francis Ltd。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Masthead Masthead Masthead Importance of the early increase in intestinal permeability in critically Ill patients Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic and open 360° fundoplication in mild and severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1