G1 and S phase gene expression cannot be analyzed in mammalian cells synchronized by inhibition.

S Cooper
{"title":"G1 and S phase gene expression cannot be analyzed in mammalian cells synchronized by inhibition.","authors":"S Cooper","doi":"10.1089/omi.1.1997.2.269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sequence analyses of mRNA from cells arrested with either a G1 phase DNA content or an S phase DNA content were interpreted as indicating that these two cell populations differentially expressed particular transcripts (Earle-Hughes et al. Genome Sci Technol 1, 89-128, 1996). Approximately 13% of the total transcript population appeared to be differentially expressed between the G1 and S phases of the cell cycle. The question arises if it is possible, using inhibition methods (double-thymidine block to produce cells with an S phase DNA content and inhibition with dibutyryl adenosine 3'5'-cyclic monophosphate and theophylline to produce cells with a G1 phase DNA content), to truly synchronize cells and obtain cell populations representative of specific phases of the division cycle. Here it is argued that this is not possible. Cells may have specific amounts of DNA (i.e., G1 phase or S phase DNA content) yet not be representative of these particular phases. It is proposed that the differential gene expression observed may be due to the effects of the inhibitors and does not necessarily reflect the actual transcription pattern in unperturbed cells in specific cell cycle phases. This proposal has a wide applicability and should not be confined to the specific article under discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":79689,"journal":{"name":"Microbial & comparative genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/omi.1.1997.2.269","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial & comparative genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.1.1997.2.269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Sequence analyses of mRNA from cells arrested with either a G1 phase DNA content or an S phase DNA content were interpreted as indicating that these two cell populations differentially expressed particular transcripts (Earle-Hughes et al. Genome Sci Technol 1, 89-128, 1996). Approximately 13% of the total transcript population appeared to be differentially expressed between the G1 and S phases of the cell cycle. The question arises if it is possible, using inhibition methods (double-thymidine block to produce cells with an S phase DNA content and inhibition with dibutyryl adenosine 3'5'-cyclic monophosphate and theophylline to produce cells with a G1 phase DNA content), to truly synchronize cells and obtain cell populations representative of specific phases of the division cycle. Here it is argued that this is not possible. Cells may have specific amounts of DNA (i.e., G1 phase or S phase DNA content) yet not be representative of these particular phases. It is proposed that the differential gene expression observed may be due to the effects of the inhibitors and does not necessarily reflect the actual transcription pattern in unperturbed cells in specific cell cycle phases. This proposal has a wide applicability and should not be confined to the specific article under discussion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
G1期和S期基因在哺乳动物细胞中不能通过抑制同步表达。
从G1期DNA含量或S期DNA含量的细胞中获得的mRNA序列分析被解释为表明这两个细胞群体表达特定转录物的差异(Earle-Hughes等)。基因组科学技术1,89-128,1996)。大约13%的转录本在细胞周期的G1期和S期之间表现出差异表达。问题是,是否有可能使用抑制方法(双胸苷阻断产生具有S期DNA含量的细胞,用3'5'环单磷酸二丁基腺苷和茶碱抑制产生具有G1期DNA含量的细胞)来真正同步细胞并获得代表分裂周期特定阶段的细胞群。这里有人认为这是不可能的。细胞可能有特定数量的DNA(即G1期或S期DNA含量),但不能代表这些特定的阶段。我们提出,观察到的差异基因表达可能是由于抑制剂的作用,并不一定反映在特定细胞周期阶段未受干扰的细胞中的实际转录模式。这一建议具有广泛的适用性,不应局限于讨论中的具体条款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Genomics: 20th International Conference, RECOMB-CG 2023, Istanbul, Turkey, April 14–15, 2023, Proceedings Comparative Genomics: 19th International Conference, RECOMB-CG 2022, La Jolla, CA, USA, May 20–21, 2022, Proceedings Co-evolutionary Models for Reconstructing Ancestral Genomic Sequences: Computational Issues and Biological Examples Ordering Partially Assembled Genomes Using Gene Arrangements On Genome Evolution with Accumulated Change and Innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1