Association between transfusion of stored blood and infective bacterial complications after resection for colorectal cancer

Tom-Harald Edna, Tormod Bjerkeset
{"title":"Association between transfusion of stored blood and infective bacterial complications after resection for colorectal cancer","authors":"Tom-Harald Edna,&nbsp;Tormod Bjerkeset","doi":"10.1080/110241598750004265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective:</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the association between blood transfusion and bacterial infective complications after resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design:</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting:</h3>\n \n <p>District hospital; Norway.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Subjects:</h3>\n \n <p>446 consecutive patients having resection of colorectal adenocarcinoma.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures:</h3>\n \n <p>Postoperative bacterial infective morbidity in hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results:</h3>\n \n <p>112 patients (25%) developed postoperative infections in hospital. Univariate analysis showed that the development of infection was significantly associated with increasing age (<i>p</i> = 0.02), rectal compared with colonic cancer (<i>p</i> = 0.002), preoperative radiotherapy (<i>p</i> = 0.005), blood loss during operation (<i>p</i> = 0.001), the extent of the primary tumour (T stage): T4 compared with T1–T3 (<i>p</i> = 0.004), the presence of regional lymph node metastasis (N stage): N1–N3 compared with N0 (<i>p</i> = 0.01), operating surgeon 1 (<i>p</i> = 0.009), operating surgeon 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.03), and blood transfusion (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the following variables were independent predictors of infection: age, rectal compared with colonic cancer, T stage, N stage, and blood transfusion. The corrected odds ratios for infection were 1.5 (95% CI 0.8 to 2.8) when 1–3 units of blood were given and 3.1 (95% CI 1.6 to 6.0) when more than three units were given. Storage time did not affect the rate of postoperative infections in patients given transfusions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion:</h3>\n \n <p>Transfusion of non-filtered stored allogeneic blood suspended in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol is an independent risk factor for the development of postoperative infections in hospital in patients having a resection of colorectal cancer. Copyright © 1998 Taylor and Francis Ltd.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100508,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Surgery","volume":"164 6","pages":"449-456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241598750004265","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/110241598750004265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

Objective:

To examine the association between blood transfusion and bacterial infective complications after resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

District hospital; Norway.

Subjects:

446 consecutive patients having resection of colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Main outcome measures:

Postoperative bacterial infective morbidity in hospital.

Results:

112 patients (25%) developed postoperative infections in hospital. Univariate analysis showed that the development of infection was significantly associated with increasing age (p = 0.02), rectal compared with colonic cancer (p = 0.002), preoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.005), blood loss during operation (p = 0.001), the extent of the primary tumour (T stage): T4 compared with T1–T3 (p = 0.004), the presence of regional lymph node metastasis (N stage): N1–N3 compared with N0 (p = 0.01), operating surgeon 1 (p = 0.009), operating surgeon 2 (p = 0.03), and blood transfusion (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the following variables were independent predictors of infection: age, rectal compared with colonic cancer, T stage, N stage, and blood transfusion. The corrected odds ratios for infection were 1.5 (95% CI 0.8 to 2.8) when 1–3 units of blood were given and 3.1 (95% CI 1.6 to 6.0) when more than three units were given. Storage time did not affect the rate of postoperative infections in patients given transfusions.

Conclusion:

Transfusion of non-filtered stored allogeneic blood suspended in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol is an independent risk factor for the development of postoperative infections in hospital in patients having a resection of colorectal cancer. Copyright © 1998 Taylor and Francis Ltd.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠癌术后输血与感染性细菌并发症的关系
目的:探讨大肠癌术后输血与细菌感染并发症的关系。设计:回顾性队列研究。地点:区医院;挪威。对象:446例连续行结直肠腺癌切除术的患者。主要观察指标:术后院内细菌感染发生率。结果:术后院内感染112例(25%)。单因素分析显示,感染的发生与年龄的增加(p = 0.02)、直肠癌与结肠癌的比较(p = 0.002)、术前放疗(p = 0.005)、术中出血量(p = 0.001)、原发肿瘤的范围(T期):T4期与T1-T3期(p = 0.004)、区域淋巴结转移(N期)的存在显著相关。n1 ~ n3与N0比较(p = 0.01),手术1 (p = 0.009),手术2 (p = 0.03),输血(p <0.001)。多因素logistic回归分析显示以下变量是感染的独立预测因素:年龄、直肠癌与结肠癌的比较、T期、N期和输血。当输血量为1-3单位时,感染的校正优势比为1.5 (95% CI 0.8至2.8),当输血量超过3单位时,感染的校正优势比为3.1 (95% CI 1.6至6.0)。保存时间对输血患者术后感染率无影响。结论:未过滤的异基因悬吊血是结直肠癌切除术后院内感染发生的独立危险因素。版权所有©1998 Taylor and Francis Ltd。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Masthead Masthead Masthead Importance of the early increase in intestinal permeability in critically Ill patients Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic and open 360° fundoplication in mild and severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1