Research utilization: evaluation of initiatives in a public health nursing division.

Y A Camiletti, M C Huffman
{"title":"Research utilization: evaluation of initiatives in a public health nursing division.","authors":"Y A Camiletti,&nbsp;M C Huffman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The need to incorporate research findings into public health nursing has never been greater. This paper describes briefly, the initiatives to promote research in a public health nursing division and the results of the evaluation questionnaire. Results indicated that public health nurses valued research and felt comfortable with the concepts and phases of the research utilization model. They would engage in research activities if conducted at team meetings and when time was allotted. They identified administrative support and the supportive environment as being positive facilitators to research utilization. Despite these findings, the majority (67.5%) were not changing their practice as a result of the initiatives. They identified having difficulty formulating a research question and needing assistance with article critique. Time was cited as the greatest deterrent. They felt they did not have time to read research or engage in the steps of the research utilization model. Recommendations from the evaluation include the need to designate time for research utilization at team meetings. Once the nurses comfort level and value placed on research utilization increases, they may be motivated to initiate research activities on their own.</p>","PeriodicalId":77058,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of nursing administration","volume":"11 2","pages":"59-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of nursing administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need to incorporate research findings into public health nursing has never been greater. This paper describes briefly, the initiatives to promote research in a public health nursing division and the results of the evaluation questionnaire. Results indicated that public health nurses valued research and felt comfortable with the concepts and phases of the research utilization model. They would engage in research activities if conducted at team meetings and when time was allotted. They identified administrative support and the supportive environment as being positive facilitators to research utilization. Despite these findings, the majority (67.5%) were not changing their practice as a result of the initiatives. They identified having difficulty formulating a research question and needing assistance with article critique. Time was cited as the greatest deterrent. They felt they did not have time to read research or engage in the steps of the research utilization model. Recommendations from the evaluation include the need to designate time for research utilization at team meetings. Once the nurses comfort level and value placed on research utilization increases, they may be motivated to initiate research activities on their own.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究利用:评价公共卫生护理部门的举措。
将研究成果纳入公共卫生护理的必要性从未如此之大。本文简要介绍了公共卫生护理科推动研究的举措和评估问卷的结果。结果表明,公共卫生护士重视研究,对研究利用模式的概念和阶段感到满意。如果在小组会议上进行,在分配时间的情况下,他们会参与研究活动。他们确定行政支持和支持性环境是研究利用的积极促进者。尽管有这些发现,大多数(67.5%)并没有因为这些措施而改变他们的做法。他们发现在制定研究问题方面有困难,在文章评论方面需要帮助。时间被认为是最大的威慑。他们觉得他们没有时间阅读研究或参与研究利用模型的步骤。评估的建议包括需要在小组会议上指定研究利用的时间。一旦护士的舒适程度和对研究利用的重视程度提高,他们可能会被激励去开展自己的研究活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Home care--when will the information age arrive? Perspective: the world, your work and you! Witmer establishes provincial task force to review nursing services. Health care issues: managing services and people in home care: today's challenge. Bridging the gap: medical directives for acute care nurse practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1