Clinical experience with endovascular treatment of aneurysms using Guglielmi detachable coils.

Christoforidis, Valavanis
{"title":"Clinical experience with endovascular treatment of aneurysms using Guglielmi detachable coils.","authors":"Christoforidis,&nbsp;Valavanis","doi":"10.1007/s003290050092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs) provide an endovascular means for aneurysm treatment; however, their role has yet to be defined. This article reviews the most recent clinical series regarding efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes in both the acute and nonacute setting. Successful treatment was possible in the majority of cases and included cases of complete aneurysm obliteration and with only a small neck remnant. Patients with a neck remnant often received additional treatments although some patients went on to complete obliteration without further treatment. Successful treatment provided protection from rebleeding in a follow-up period of 2 years. Success depended on operator experience as well as width of the aneurysm ostium. Recurrence and incomplete obliteration were more common with giant or large aneurysms and aneurysms with a wide base. Major procedure-related complications predominantly resulted from intraprocedural rupture and thromboembolic events. These could both be treated via endovascular means at the time of the procedure. Thromboembolic events occurred more frequently with acutely ruptured aneurysms, especially aneurysms with a wide base. Vasospasm rates were not found to vary significantly from those found in surgical series when corrected for Fisher grouping. Morbidity and mortality rates as well as Glasgow outcome scores were at least as good as what would be expected from surgery during both the acute and nonacute setting. The papers reviewed indicate that the GDC provides safe and efficacious treatment for most berry aneurysms in both the acute and nonacute setting relative to surgical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":79482,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR","volume":"8 5","pages":"295-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s003290050092","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s003290050092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs) provide an endovascular means for aneurysm treatment; however, their role has yet to be defined. This article reviews the most recent clinical series regarding efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes in both the acute and nonacute setting. Successful treatment was possible in the majority of cases and included cases of complete aneurysm obliteration and with only a small neck remnant. Patients with a neck remnant often received additional treatments although some patients went on to complete obliteration without further treatment. Successful treatment provided protection from rebleeding in a follow-up period of 2 years. Success depended on operator experience as well as width of the aneurysm ostium. Recurrence and incomplete obliteration were more common with giant or large aneurysms and aneurysms with a wide base. Major procedure-related complications predominantly resulted from intraprocedural rupture and thromboembolic events. These could both be treated via endovascular means at the time of the procedure. Thromboembolic events occurred more frequently with acutely ruptured aneurysms, especially aneurysms with a wide base. Vasospasm rates were not found to vary significantly from those found in surgical series when corrected for Fisher grouping. Morbidity and mortality rates as well as Glasgow outcome scores were at least as good as what would be expected from surgery during both the acute and nonacute setting. The papers reviewed indicate that the GDC provides safe and efficacious treatment for most berry aneurysms in both the acute and nonacute setting relative to surgical results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可拆卸线圈在血管内治疗动脉瘤的临床体会。
Guglielmi可拆卸线圈(gdc)为动脉瘤治疗提供了血管内手段;然而,它们的作用还有待界定。这篇文章回顾了关于急性和非急性环境下的有效性、安全性和临床结果的最新临床系列。成功的治疗是可能的,在大多数情况下,包括病例完全动脉瘤闭塞,只有一个小的颈部残余。颈部残余的患者经常接受额外的治疗,尽管有些患者在没有进一步治疗的情况下完全闭塞。成功的治疗在2年的随访期间提供了防止再出血的保护。手术的成功与否取决于手术者的经验以及动脉瘤口的宽度。复发和不完全闭塞多见于巨大或较大的动脉瘤和宽基底的动脉瘤。主要的手术相关并发症主要由术中破裂和血栓栓塞事件引起。这些都可以在手术时通过血管内手段进行治疗。急性破裂的动脉瘤更容易发生血栓栓塞事件,尤其是基底较宽的动脉瘤。经Fisher分组校正后,血管痉挛发生率与手术组无明显差异。在急性和非急性情况下,发病率和死亡率以及格拉斯哥结果评分至少与预期的手术一样好。综述的论文表明,相对于手术结果,GDC在急性和非急性情况下为大多数浆果动脉瘤提供了安全有效的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Society news Cervical spinal trauma Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: how to select candidates for pallidal or subthalamic stimulation Diffuse axonal injury: its role in diffuse brain injury and its significance for severe disability and vegetative state Radiation therapy for gliomas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1