Carotid plaque characterization using digital image processing and its potential in future studies of carotid endarterectomy and angioplasty.

G M Biasi, P M Mingazzini, L Baronio, M R Piglionica, S A Ferrari, T S Elatrozy, A N Nicolaides
{"title":"Carotid plaque characterization using digital image processing and its potential in future studies of carotid endarterectomy and angioplasty.","authors":"G M Biasi,&nbsp;P M Mingazzini,&nbsp;L Baronio,&nbsp;M R Piglionica,&nbsp;S A Ferrari,&nbsp;T S Elatrozy,&nbsp;A N Nicolaides","doi":"10.1583/1074-6218(1998)005<0240:CPCUDI>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To corroborate the validity of a computerized methodology for evaluating carotid lesions at risk for stroke based on plaque echogenicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of 96 carotid endarterectomy patients (59 men; median age 69.5 years, range 52 to 83) with stenoses > 50% were studied retrospectively. Forty-one patients (43%) had been symptomatic preoperatively. All patients had undergone computed tomography (CT) to detect infarction in the carotid territory and a duplex scan to measure carotid stenosis. Plaque echogenicity was analyzed by computer, expressing the echodensity in terms of the gray scale median (GSM). The incidence of CT-documented cerebral infarction was analyzed in relation to symptomatology, percent stenosis, and echodensity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Symptoms correlated well with CT evidence of brain infarction: 32% of symptomatic patients had a positive CT scan versus 16% for asymptomatic plaques (p = 0.076). The mean GSM value was 56 +/- 14 for plaques associated with negative CT scans and 38 +/- 13 for plaques from patients with positive scans (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the GSM value between plaques with > or < 70% stenosis. Furthermore, the incidence of CT infarction was 40% in the cerebral territory of carotid plaques with a GSM value < 50 and only 9% in those with a GSM > 50 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Computerized analysis of plaque echogenicity appears to provide clinically useful data that correlates with the incidence of cerebral infarction and symptoms. This method of analyzing plaque echolucency could be used as a screening tool for carotid stent studies to identify high-risk lesions better suited to conventional surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":79443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1583/1074-6218(1998)005<0240:CPCUDI>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Purpose: To corroborate the validity of a computerized methodology for evaluating carotid lesions at risk for stroke based on plaque echogenicity.

Methods: The records of 96 carotid endarterectomy patients (59 men; median age 69.5 years, range 52 to 83) with stenoses > 50% were studied retrospectively. Forty-one patients (43%) had been symptomatic preoperatively. All patients had undergone computed tomography (CT) to detect infarction in the carotid territory and a duplex scan to measure carotid stenosis. Plaque echogenicity was analyzed by computer, expressing the echodensity in terms of the gray scale median (GSM). The incidence of CT-documented cerebral infarction was analyzed in relation to symptomatology, percent stenosis, and echodensity.

Results: Symptoms correlated well with CT evidence of brain infarction: 32% of symptomatic patients had a positive CT scan versus 16% for asymptomatic plaques (p = 0.076). The mean GSM value was 56 +/- 14 for plaques associated with negative CT scans and 38 +/- 13 for plaques from patients with positive scans (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the GSM value between plaques with > or < 70% stenosis. Furthermore, the incidence of CT infarction was 40% in the cerebral territory of carotid plaques with a GSM value < 50 and only 9% in those with a GSM > 50 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Computerized analysis of plaque echogenicity appears to provide clinically useful data that correlates with the incidence of cerebral infarction and symptoms. This method of analyzing plaque echolucency could be used as a screening tool for carotid stent studies to identify high-risk lesions better suited to conventional surgical treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字图像处理的颈动脉斑块特征及其在颈动脉内膜切除术和血管成形术未来研究中的潜力。
目的:验证基于斑块回声性评估颈动脉病变卒中风险的计算机化方法的有效性。方法:96例颈动脉内膜切除术患者(男性59例;回顾性研究中位年龄69.5岁,范围52 ~ 83岁,狭窄> 50%。术前有症状者41例(43%)。所有患者都接受了计算机断层扫描(CT)以检测颈动脉区域的梗死,并进行了双工扫描以测量颈动脉狭窄。用计算机分析斑块的回声密度,用灰度中值(GSM)表示回声密度。分析ct记录的脑梗死发生率与症状、狭窄百分比和超声密度的关系。结果:症状与脑梗死的CT证据密切相关:32%有症状的患者CT扫描呈阳性,而16%无症状斑块呈阳性(p = 0.076)。CT扫描阴性斑块的平均GSM值为56 +/- 14,CT扫描阳性斑块的平均GSM值为38 +/- 13 (p < 0.0001)。然而,狭窄>和< 70%斑块之间的GSM值没有差异。此外,GSM值< 50的颈动脉斑块脑区CT梗死发生率为40%,而GSM值> 50的CT梗死发生率仅为9% (p < 0.001)。结论:对斑块回声性的计算机分析似乎提供了与脑梗死发生率和症状相关的临床有用数据。这种分析斑块回声的方法可以作为颈动脉支架研究的筛选工具,以确定更适合常规手术治疗的高危病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aorto-left renal vein fistula: is there a place for endovascular management? Aortocaval fistula: a challenge for endovascular management. Endovascular repair of an aortoenteric fistula in a high-risk patient. Carotid stenting using radial artery access. Neurological monitoring during carotid artery stenting: the Duck Squeezing Test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1