Dilatation of the infrarenal aneurysm neck after endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

B Sonesson, M Malina, K Ivancev, M Lindh, B Lindblad, J Brunkwall
{"title":"Dilatation of the infrarenal aneurysm neck after endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm.","authors":"B Sonesson,&nbsp;M Malina,&nbsp;K Ivancev,&nbsp;M Lindh,&nbsp;B Lindblad,&nbsp;J Brunkwall","doi":"10.1583/1074-6218(1998)005<0195:DOTIAN>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the fate of the infrarenal aneurysm neck and suprarenal aorta after endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-four patients underwent endovascular AAA repair between January 1994 and December 1995 using custom-made stent-grafts constructed from polyester graft material and modified self-expanding Gianturco Z-stents sutured to the graft orifices. Thirty-one patients were available for follow-up. Pre- and postimplantation diameters were measured using spiral computed tomography in the infrarenal aneurysm neck and the suprarenal aorta at the level of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up time was 25 months. There was a significant increase of the diameter of the infrarenal aneurysm neck (+ 1.65 mm, p = 0.002), but not in the aorta at the level of the SMA (+0.52 mm, p = 0.100). There was no difference in the change in diameter in the infrarenal neck in the group with a stent adjacent to the level of measurement (n = 20) compared with the group without an adjacent stent (n = 11, p = 0.790). There was no correlation between preimplantation size of the infrarenal neck and its diameter change (r = 0.14, p = 0.488). There was no correlation (r = 0.10, p = 0.603) or association (chi-square test, p = 0.211) between aortic diameter change at the level of the SMA and the infrarenal neck.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This investigation shows a significant dilatation of the infrarenal aneurysm neck, but not in the suprarenal aorta, after endovascular AAA repair with this device. The clinical significance of these findings is unclear. Whether such a dilatation in the infrarenal aneurysm neck may affect the long-term attachment of stent-grafts remains to be shown in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":79443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"69","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1583/1074-6218(1998)005<0195:DOTIAN>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 69

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the fate of the infrarenal aneurysm neck and suprarenal aorta after endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

Methods: Thirty-four patients underwent endovascular AAA repair between January 1994 and December 1995 using custom-made stent-grafts constructed from polyester graft material and modified self-expanding Gianturco Z-stents sutured to the graft orifices. Thirty-one patients were available for follow-up. Pre- and postimplantation diameters were measured using spiral computed tomography in the infrarenal aneurysm neck and the suprarenal aorta at the level of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA).

Results: The mean follow-up time was 25 months. There was a significant increase of the diameter of the infrarenal aneurysm neck (+ 1.65 mm, p = 0.002), but not in the aorta at the level of the SMA (+0.52 mm, p = 0.100). There was no difference in the change in diameter in the infrarenal neck in the group with a stent adjacent to the level of measurement (n = 20) compared with the group without an adjacent stent (n = 11, p = 0.790). There was no correlation between preimplantation size of the infrarenal neck and its diameter change (r = 0.14, p = 0.488). There was no correlation (r = 0.10, p = 0.603) or association (chi-square test, p = 0.211) between aortic diameter change at the level of the SMA and the infrarenal neck.

Conclusions: This investigation shows a significant dilatation of the infrarenal aneurysm neck, but not in the suprarenal aorta, after endovascular AAA repair with this device. The clinical significance of these findings is unclear. Whether such a dilatation in the infrarenal aneurysm neck may affect the long-term attachment of stent-grafts remains to be shown in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹主动脉瘤血管内排除术后肾下动脉瘤颈部扩张。
目的:探讨腹主动脉瘤(AAAs)血管内排除术后肾下动脉瘤颈部及肾上主动脉的预后。方法:1994年1月至1995年12月间,34例患者行AAA血管内修复术,采用聚酯材料自制支架和改良自膨胀Gianturco z型支架缝合于移植口。31例患者可随访。在肠系膜上动脉(SMA)水平,采用螺旋计算机断层扫描测量动脉瘤颈和肾上主动脉植入前后的直径。结果:平均随访25个月。肾下动脉瘤颈直径明显增加(+ 1.65 mm, p = 0.002),而主动脉在SMA水平上没有明显增加(+0.52 mm, p = 0.100)。在测量水平附近放置支架组(n = 20)与未放置支架组(n = 11, p = 0.790)相比,肾下颈直径变化无差异。植入前肾下颈大小与肾下颈直径变化无相关性(r = 0.14, p = 0.488)。SMA水平的主动脉直径变化与肾下颈之间无相关性(r = 0.10, p = 0.603)或相关性(卡方检验,p = 0.211)。结论:本研究显示,在使用该装置进行血管内AAA修复后,动脉瘤颈部明显扩张,而肾上主动脉没有明显扩张。这些发现的临床意义尚不清楚。这种在动脉瘤颈部的扩张是否会影响支架移植物的长期附着还有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aorto-left renal vein fistula: is there a place for endovascular management? Aortocaval fistula: a challenge for endovascular management. Endovascular repair of an aortoenteric fistula in a high-risk patient. Carotid stenting using radial artery access. Neurological monitoring during carotid artery stenting: the Duck Squeezing Test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1