Breast irradiation in women with early stage invasive breast cancer following breast conservation surgery. Provincial Breast Disease Site Group.

T J Whelan, B M Lada, E Laukkanen, F E Perera, W E Shelley, M N Levine
{"title":"Breast irradiation in women with early stage invasive breast cancer following breast conservation surgery. Provincial Breast Disease Site Group.","authors":"T J Whelan,&nbsp;B M Lada,&nbsp;E Laukkanen,&nbsp;F E Perera,&nbsp;W E Shelley,&nbsp;M N Levine","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Guideline questions: </strong>1) Should breast irradiation be given to women with early stage invasive breast cancer (stage I and II) following breast conservation surgery (lumpectomy with clear resection margins and axillary dissection)? 2) Is there an optimal schedule for breast irradiation? 3) What is a reasonable interval between definitive surgery and the start of breast irradiation? 4) Are there patients who can be spared breast irradiation after lumpectomy?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To make recommendations about the use of breast irradiation in women with early stage invasive breast cancer following breast conservation surgery.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Local control is the primary endpoint of interest. Survival, quality of life (addressed through the adverse effects of radiotherapy) and cosmesis are also considered.</p><p><strong>Perspective (values): </strong>Evidence was selected and reviewed by 6 members of the Breast Disease Site Group (Breast DSG) of the Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative. Earlier drafts of the evidence-based recommendation were reviewed, discussed and approved by the Breast DSG, which comprises medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, pathologists and a medical sociologist. There was no participation by a community representative in the development of this guideline.</p><p><strong>Quality of evidence: </strong>There are 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 meta-analysis comparing breast irradiation with no breast irradiation following breast conservation surgery; 6 randomized trials comparing breast conservation surgery plus breast irradiation with mastectomy are also included, as well as several retrospective studies.</p><p><strong>Benefits: </strong>All of the 5 RCTs showed a significant decrease in local recurrence rates among patients receiving radiotherapy. In the 4 trials with a median follow-up of 5 years or longer, the relative risk reduction with breast irradiation ranged from 69% to 88%. The absolute differences ranged from 16% (p < 0.001) to 25% (p < 0.001). Despite the effect on local recurrence, no difference in survival was detected in any of the 5 trials. Most of the patients with local recurrence in these trials underwent mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Harms: </strong>Major adverse effects of breast irradiation occur very infrequently.</p><p><strong>Practice guideline: </strong>Women with early stage invasive breast cancer (stage I and II) who have undergone breast conservation surgery should be offered postoperative breast irradiation. The optimal fractionation schedule for breast irradiation has not been established, and the role of boost irradiation is unclear. Outside of a clinical trial, 2 commonly used fractionation schedules are suggested: 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole breast, or 40 Gy in 16 fractions to the whole breast with a local boost to the primary site of 12.5 Gy in 5 fractions. Shorter schedules (e.g., 40 or 44 Gy in 16 fractions) have also been used routinely in some centres. The enrollment of patients in ongoing clinical trials is encouraged. Women who have undergone breast conservation surgery should receive local breast irradiation as soon as possible after wound healing. A safe interval between surgery and the start of radiotherapy is unknown, but it is reasonable to start breast irradiation within 12 weeks after definitive surgery. For women who are candidates for chemotherapy, the optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and breast irradiation is unknown. It is reasonable to start radiotherapy after the completion of chemotherapy, or concurrently if anthracycline-containing regimens are not used. For further information, please refer to Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative's practice guideline \"Surgical Management of Early Stage Invasive Breast Cancer (stage I and II).\"</p>","PeriodicalId":79570,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","volume":"1 3","pages":"228-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guideline questions: 1) Should breast irradiation be given to women with early stage invasive breast cancer (stage I and II) following breast conservation surgery (lumpectomy with clear resection margins and axillary dissection)? 2) Is there an optimal schedule for breast irradiation? 3) What is a reasonable interval between definitive surgery and the start of breast irradiation? 4) Are there patients who can be spared breast irradiation after lumpectomy?

Objective: To make recommendations about the use of breast irradiation in women with early stage invasive breast cancer following breast conservation surgery.

Outcomes: Local control is the primary endpoint of interest. Survival, quality of life (addressed through the adverse effects of radiotherapy) and cosmesis are also considered.

Perspective (values): Evidence was selected and reviewed by 6 members of the Breast Disease Site Group (Breast DSG) of the Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative. Earlier drafts of the evidence-based recommendation were reviewed, discussed and approved by the Breast DSG, which comprises medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, pathologists and a medical sociologist. There was no participation by a community representative in the development of this guideline.

Quality of evidence: There are 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 meta-analysis comparing breast irradiation with no breast irradiation following breast conservation surgery; 6 randomized trials comparing breast conservation surgery plus breast irradiation with mastectomy are also included, as well as several retrospective studies.

Benefits: All of the 5 RCTs showed a significant decrease in local recurrence rates among patients receiving radiotherapy. In the 4 trials with a median follow-up of 5 years or longer, the relative risk reduction with breast irradiation ranged from 69% to 88%. The absolute differences ranged from 16% (p < 0.001) to 25% (p < 0.001). Despite the effect on local recurrence, no difference in survival was detected in any of the 5 trials. Most of the patients with local recurrence in these trials underwent mastectomy.

Harms: Major adverse effects of breast irradiation occur very infrequently.

Practice guideline: Women with early stage invasive breast cancer (stage I and II) who have undergone breast conservation surgery should be offered postoperative breast irradiation. The optimal fractionation schedule for breast irradiation has not been established, and the role of boost irradiation is unclear. Outside of a clinical trial, 2 commonly used fractionation schedules are suggested: 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole breast, or 40 Gy in 16 fractions to the whole breast with a local boost to the primary site of 12.5 Gy in 5 fractions. Shorter schedules (e.g., 40 or 44 Gy in 16 fractions) have also been used routinely in some centres. The enrollment of patients in ongoing clinical trials is encouraged. Women who have undergone breast conservation surgery should receive local breast irradiation as soon as possible after wound healing. A safe interval between surgery and the start of radiotherapy is unknown, but it is reasonable to start breast irradiation within 12 weeks after definitive surgery. For women who are candidates for chemotherapy, the optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and breast irradiation is unknown. It is reasonable to start radiotherapy after the completion of chemotherapy, or concurrently if anthracycline-containing regimens are not used. For further information, please refer to Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative's practice guideline "Surgical Management of Early Stage Invasive Breast Cancer (stage I and II)."

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期浸润性乳腺癌保乳手术后的乳房放射治疗。省乳腺疾病现场组。
指南问题:1)早期浸润性乳腺癌(I期和II期)患者在保乳手术(乳房肿瘤切除,切除边缘清晰,腋窝清扫)后是否应该进行乳房照射?2)乳房照射是否有一个最佳的时间表?3)确定手术和开始乳房照射之间的合理间隔是多少?4)是否有患者在乳房肿瘤切除术后可以免乳房照射?目的:探讨早期浸润性乳腺癌保乳手术后乳腺放射治疗的建议。结果:局部控制是主要的研究终点。生存,生活质量(通过放疗的不良反应来解决)和美容也被考虑在内。观点(价值):证据由安大略省癌症治疗实践指南倡议乳腺疾病现场组(Breast DSG)的6名成员选择和审查。由肿瘤内科医生、放射肿瘤学家、外科医生、流行病学家、病理学家和一名医学社会学家组成的乳腺研究小组审查、讨论并批准了以证据为基础的建议的早期草案。该准则的制定过程中没有社区代表的参与。证据质量:有5项随机对照试验(rct)和1项荟萃分析比较了保乳手术后乳房照射与不照射;还包括6项比较保乳手术加乳房照射与乳房切除术的随机试验,以及几项回顾性研究。益处:5项随机对照试验均显示接受放疗的患者局部复发率显著降低。在中位随访时间为5年或更长时间的4项试验中,乳房照射的相对风险降低幅度从69%到88%不等。绝对差异范围从16% (p < 0.001)到25% (p < 0.001)。尽管对局部复发有影响,但在5项试验中均未发现生存差异。在这些试验中,大多数局部复发的患者都接受了乳房切除术。危害:乳房照射的主要不良反应很少发生。实践指南:早期浸润性乳腺癌(I期和II期)行保乳手术的妇女术后应给予乳房照射。乳腺照射的最佳分步时间表尚未确定,增强照射的作用尚不清楚。在临床试验之外,建议采用两种常用的分割方案:50 Gy分25次向全乳照射,或40 Gy分16次向全乳照射,局部增强至原发部位12.5 Gy分5次照射。一些中心还常规使用较短的时间表(例如,16份40或44 Gy)。鼓励正在进行的临床试验纳入患者。做过保乳手术的妇女应在伤口愈合后尽快接受局部乳房照射。手术和放疗之间的安全间隔尚不清楚,但在确定手术后12周内开始乳房放疗是合理的。对于候选化疗的女性,化疗和乳房放疗的最佳顺序尚不清楚。化疗结束后开始放疗是合理的,如果不使用含蒽环类药物的方案,也可以同时开始放疗。欲了解更多信息,请参考安大略省癌症治疗实践指南倡议的实践指南“早期浸润性乳腺癌(I期和II期)的手术管理”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Have diagnostic practices contributed to trends in leukemia incidence and mortality among Canadians? An epidemiological review of red cell transfusions in cancer chemotherapy. Staging in cancer. The importance of alternative therapies to the public. Cancer patients' expectations of the role of family physicians in communication about complementary therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1