Unresected stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Provincial Lung Cancer Disease Site Group.

G Okawara, J Rusthoven, T Newman, B Findlay, W Evans
{"title":"Unresected stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Provincial Lung Cancer Disease Site Group.","authors":"G Okawara,&nbsp;J Rusthoven,&nbsp;T Newman,&nbsp;B Findlay,&nbsp;W Evans","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Guideline questions: </strong>1) What is the role of different schedules or doses of radiotherapy in patients with unresected, clinical or pathological, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? 2) Does chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy provide improved survival compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with unresected NSCLC?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To make recommendations about the role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of unresected stage III NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Survival is the primary outcome of interest. Quality of life is a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Perspective (values): </strong>Evidence was selected and reviewed by 5 members of the Provincial Lung Cancer Disease Site Group (Lung DSG) of the Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative. The Lung DSG comprises medical and radiation oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, a psychologist and a medical sociologist. No community representative participated in the development of this guideline.</p><p><strong>Quality of evidence: </strong>Two meta-analyses were available for review. The specific analysis of interest examined the role of combined chemotherapy plus radiotherapy v. radiotherapy alone in locally advanced disease. The first meta-analysis included combined data from 22 randomized controlled (RCTs) involving a total of 3033 patients. The second included combined data from 14 RCTs involving a total of 2589 patients. Also reviewed were 4 RCTs of radiotherapy alone, 1 trial of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy that was not included in the meta-analysis, 4 abstracts of studies of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and 4 trials examining the role of hyperfractionated radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Benefits: </strong>In the first meta-analysis, an overall benefit was detected at 2 years for the use of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. A hazard ratio of 0.90 (p = 0.006), or a 10% reduction in the risk of death, translated into an absolute benefit of 3% at 2 years and 2% at 5 years. A subgroup analysis of cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone demonstrated a 13% reduction in the risk of death in the combined treatment arm (pooled hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.96), for an absolute benefit of 4% at 2 years. In the second meta-analysis, there was a 13% reduction in the risk of death in the combined therapy arm at 2 years (pooled relative risk [RR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.94) and a 17% reduction at 3 years (pooled RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.90). Subgroup analysis of cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone showed similar results: a 15% reduction in the risk of death in the combined therapy arm at 2 years (pooled RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92) and a 19% reduction at 3 years (pooled RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88).</p><p><strong>Practice guideline: </strong>For patients with unresected stage III NSCLC, the combination of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radical radiotherapy provides a survival benefit compared with radiotherapy alone. This guideline is based on high-quality evidence from 2 meta-analyses of RCTs. Patients with good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0-1) and minimal weight loss (less than 5% in the preceding 3 months) have been shown to have a survival benefit from treatment with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy and should be considered for this type of treatment approach (see section V). For these patients, thoracic irradiation of 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks, in combination with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, should be recommended as a treatment option. The patient and physician should discuss fully the benefits, limitations and toxic effects of therapy. Patients not meeting these criteria are not candidates for combined therapy; those experiencing symptoms amenable to treatment should receive palliative thoracic irradiation. At this time, hyperfractionated radiotherapy is not recommended outside of the context of a clinical trial. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)</p>","PeriodicalId":79570,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","volume":"1 3","pages":"249-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guideline questions: 1) What is the role of different schedules or doses of radiotherapy in patients with unresected, clinical or pathological, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? 2) Does chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy provide improved survival compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with unresected NSCLC?

Objective: To make recommendations about the role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of unresected stage III NSCLC.

Outcomes: Survival is the primary outcome of interest. Quality of life is a secondary outcome.

Perspective (values): Evidence was selected and reviewed by 5 members of the Provincial Lung Cancer Disease Site Group (Lung DSG) of the Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative. The Lung DSG comprises medical and radiation oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, a psychologist and a medical sociologist. No community representative participated in the development of this guideline.

Quality of evidence: Two meta-analyses were available for review. The specific analysis of interest examined the role of combined chemotherapy plus radiotherapy v. radiotherapy alone in locally advanced disease. The first meta-analysis included combined data from 22 randomized controlled (RCTs) involving a total of 3033 patients. The second included combined data from 14 RCTs involving a total of 2589 patients. Also reviewed were 4 RCTs of radiotherapy alone, 1 trial of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy that was not included in the meta-analysis, 4 abstracts of studies of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and 4 trials examining the role of hyperfractionated radiotherapy.

Benefits: In the first meta-analysis, an overall benefit was detected at 2 years for the use of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. A hazard ratio of 0.90 (p = 0.006), or a 10% reduction in the risk of death, translated into an absolute benefit of 3% at 2 years and 2% at 5 years. A subgroup analysis of cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone demonstrated a 13% reduction in the risk of death in the combined treatment arm (pooled hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.96), for an absolute benefit of 4% at 2 years. In the second meta-analysis, there was a 13% reduction in the risk of death in the combined therapy arm at 2 years (pooled relative risk [RR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.94) and a 17% reduction at 3 years (pooled RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.90). Subgroup analysis of cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone showed similar results: a 15% reduction in the risk of death in the combined therapy arm at 2 years (pooled RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92) and a 19% reduction at 3 years (pooled RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88).

Practice guideline: For patients with unresected stage III NSCLC, the combination of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radical radiotherapy provides a survival benefit compared with radiotherapy alone. This guideline is based on high-quality evidence from 2 meta-analyses of RCTs. Patients with good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0-1) and minimal weight loss (less than 5% in the preceding 3 months) have been shown to have a survival benefit from treatment with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy and should be considered for this type of treatment approach (see section V). For these patients, thoracic irradiation of 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks, in combination with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, should be recommended as a treatment option. The patient and physician should discuss fully the benefits, limitations and toxic effects of therapy. Patients not meeting these criteria are not candidates for combined therapy; those experiencing symptoms amenable to treatment should receive palliative thoracic irradiation. At this time, hyperfractionated radiotherapy is not recommended outside of the context of a clinical trial. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未切除的III期非小细胞肺癌。省肺癌疾病现场组。
指南问题:1)在未切除的临床或病理III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,不同放疗方案或剂量的作用是什么?2)与单独放疗相比,化疗联合放疗是否能提高未切除的NSCLC患者的生存率?目的:探讨化疗和放疗在未切除的III期非小细胞肺癌治疗中的作用。结局:生存是主要的结局。生活质量是次要的结果。观点(价值):证据由安大略省癌症治疗实践指南倡议的省级肺癌疾病现场组(Lung DSG)的5名成员选择和审查。肺DSG由医学和放射肿瘤学家、病理学家、外科医生、流行病学家、心理学家和医学社会学家组成。没有社区代表参与该指南的制定。证据质量:两项荟萃分析可供回顾。本研究特别分析了化疗加放疗与单独放疗在局部晚期疾病中的作用。第一个荟萃分析包括来自22个随机对照(rct)的综合数据,共涉及3033名患者。第二组纳入了14项随机对照试验的综合数据,共涉及2589名患者。同时回顾了4项单独放疗的随机对照试验,1项未纳入meta分析的化疗和放疗联合试验,4项化疗和放疗联合研究的摘要,以及4项检查超分割放疗作用的试验。益处:在第一个荟萃分析中,在使用化疗和放疗联合治疗2年后发现了总体益处。风险比为0.90 (p = 0.006),或死亡风险降低10%,转化为2年和5年的绝对获益分别为3%和2%。一项基于顺铂的化疗加放疗与单独放疗的亚组分析显示,联合治疗组的死亡风险降低13%(合并风险比0.87,95%可信区间[CI] 0.79-0.96), 2年的绝对获益为4%。在第二项荟萃分析中,联合治疗组2年时死亡风险降低13%(合并相对危险度[RR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.94), 3年时死亡风险降低17%(合并相对危险度[RR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.90)。以顺铂为基础的化疗加放疗与单独放疗的亚组分析显示类似的结果:联合治疗组2年死亡风险降低15%(合并RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92), 3年死亡风险降低19%(合并RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88)。实践指南:对于未切除的III期NSCLC患者,与单独放疗相比,以顺铂为基础的化疗和根治性放疗联合治疗可提供生存获益。本指南基于两项随机对照试验的高质量证据。表现良好的患者(东部肿瘤合作组[ECOG] 0-1)和最小的体重减轻(前3个月小于5%)已被证明从化疗和放疗联合治疗中获得生存获益,应考虑采用这种类型的治疗方法(见第V部分)。对于这些患者,60 Gy的30次胸部照射超过6周,联合顺铂化疗,应该推荐作为一种治疗选择。患者和医生应充分讨论治疗的益处、局限性和毒性作用。不符合这些标准的患者不适合联合治疗;那些症状可以治疗的患者应接受姑息性胸部照射。目前,在临床试验之外不推荐使用超分割放疗。(抽象截断)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Have diagnostic practices contributed to trends in leukemia incidence and mortality among Canadians? An epidemiological review of red cell transfusions in cancer chemotherapy. Staging in cancer. The importance of alternative therapies to the public. Cancer patients' expectations of the role of family physicians in communication about complementary therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1