Adjuvant therapy for stage II colon cancer after complete resection. Provincial Gastrointestinal Disease Site Group.

A Figueredo, C Germond, J Maroun, G Browman, C Walker-Dilks, S Wong
{"title":"Adjuvant therapy for stage II colon cancer after complete resection. Provincial Gastrointestinal Disease Site Group.","authors":"A Figueredo,&nbsp;C Germond,&nbsp;J Maroun,&nbsp;G Browman,&nbsp;C Walker-Dilks,&nbsp;S Wong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Guideline question: </strong>Should patients with resected stage II colon cancer receive adjuvant therapy?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To make recommendations regarding the use of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of resected stage II colon cancer.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Overall survival is the primary outcome of interest. Secondary outcomes are disease-free survival and adverse effects of the treatment regimens.</p><p><strong>Perspective (values): </strong>Evidence was selected and reviewed by 2 members of the Provincial Gastrointestinal Disease Site Group (GI DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. The recommendations resulting from this review have been approved by the GI DSG, which comprise medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons and epidemiologists. Community representatives did not participate in the development of this practice guideline but will do so in future guidelines development.</p><p><strong>Quality of evidence: </strong>There are 25 published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 meta-analysis. The GI DSG pooled data from 11 of the 25 RCTs that provided adequate data.</p><p><strong>Benefits: </strong>The 25 RCTs are grouped according to the type of therapy and whether the control patients received no treatment (observation) or other adjuvant therapy after resection. Because the trials usually included patients with stage II and III cancer, the complete trial results and those for a subset of patients with stage II disease were analysed. Although the overall trial results showed a survival benefit for adjuvant treatments, the benefit was not significant for stage II patients. A meta-analysis of 11 trials comparing adjuvant treatment with observation in patients with stage II cancer indicated no significant reduction in the odds ratio (OR) for death (OR 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 1.10). The OR for death among patients receiving chemotherapy by portal vein infusion (PVI) was 0.62 (95% CI 0.35 to 1.11).</p><p><strong>Harms: </strong>The toxic effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with either levamisole or leucovorin, or both, were mild to moderate and consisted mostly of stomatitis, diarrhea and myelosuppression; 5% of patients required hospital admission. 5-FU plus levamisole was associated with transient neurotoxic effects in 18% of patients. Toxic effects associated with PVI were mild, rare and mostly consisted of leukopenia and diarrhea; 1% of patients experienced bowel perforation.</p><p><strong>Practice guideline: </strong>Adjuvant therapy is not recommended at this time for the routine management of patients with resected stage II colon cancer. Patients with stage II disease and high-risk factors (bowel obstruction, tumour adhesion, invasion, perforation or aneuploidy) have a poorer prognosis, similar to that of patients with stage III colon cancer. For individual management, these patients should be made aware of their prognosis; treatment can be considered after the uncertainty of the value of adjuvant therapy has been explained to the patient. The enrolment of patients with high-risk stage II disease in clinical trials is encouraged. Trials comparing adjuvant therapy with observation are needed and are ethically acceptable in stage II colon cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":79570,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","volume":"1 5","pages":"379-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guideline question: Should patients with resected stage II colon cancer receive adjuvant therapy?

Objective: To make recommendations regarding the use of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of resected stage II colon cancer.

Outcomes: Overall survival is the primary outcome of interest. Secondary outcomes are disease-free survival and adverse effects of the treatment regimens.

Perspective (values): Evidence was selected and reviewed by 2 members of the Provincial Gastrointestinal Disease Site Group (GI DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. The recommendations resulting from this review have been approved by the GI DSG, which comprise medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons and epidemiologists. Community representatives did not participate in the development of this practice guideline but will do so in future guidelines development.

Quality of evidence: There are 25 published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 meta-analysis. The GI DSG pooled data from 11 of the 25 RCTs that provided adequate data.

Benefits: The 25 RCTs are grouped according to the type of therapy and whether the control patients received no treatment (observation) or other adjuvant therapy after resection. Because the trials usually included patients with stage II and III cancer, the complete trial results and those for a subset of patients with stage II disease were analysed. Although the overall trial results showed a survival benefit for adjuvant treatments, the benefit was not significant for stage II patients. A meta-analysis of 11 trials comparing adjuvant treatment with observation in patients with stage II cancer indicated no significant reduction in the odds ratio (OR) for death (OR 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 1.10). The OR for death among patients receiving chemotherapy by portal vein infusion (PVI) was 0.62 (95% CI 0.35 to 1.11).

Harms: The toxic effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with either levamisole or leucovorin, or both, were mild to moderate and consisted mostly of stomatitis, diarrhea and myelosuppression; 5% of patients required hospital admission. 5-FU plus levamisole was associated with transient neurotoxic effects in 18% of patients. Toxic effects associated with PVI were mild, rare and mostly consisted of leukopenia and diarrhea; 1% of patients experienced bowel perforation.

Practice guideline: Adjuvant therapy is not recommended at this time for the routine management of patients with resected stage II colon cancer. Patients with stage II disease and high-risk factors (bowel obstruction, tumour adhesion, invasion, perforation or aneuploidy) have a poorer prognosis, similar to that of patients with stage III colon cancer. For individual management, these patients should be made aware of their prognosis; treatment can be considered after the uncertainty of the value of adjuvant therapy has been explained to the patient. The enrolment of patients with high-risk stage II disease in clinical trials is encouraged. Trials comparing adjuvant therapy with observation are needed and are ethically acceptable in stage II colon cancer.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
II期结肠癌完全切除后的辅助治疗。省胃肠病现场组。
指导问题:切除的II期结肠癌患者是否应该接受辅助治疗?目的:对二期结肠癌切除后的辅助治疗提出建议。结局:总生存期是主要的结局。次要结局是无病生存和治疗方案的不良反应。观点(价值):证据由安大略省癌症护理实践指南倡议的省胃肠道疾病现场组(GI DSG)的2名成员选择和审查。由医学和放射肿瘤学家、外科医生和流行病学家组成的GI DSG批准了这次审查产生的建议。社区代表没有参与本实践指南的制定,但将在今后的指南制定中参与。证据质量:有25项已发表的随机对照试验(rct)和1项荟萃分析。GI DSG汇集了25项随机对照试验中11项提供足够数据的数据。获益:25项rct根据治疗类型及对照患者在切除后是否未接受治疗(观察)或其他辅助治疗进行分组。由于试验通常包括II期和III期癌症患者,因此分析了完整的试验结果和II期疾病患者的子集。尽管总体试验结果显示辅助治疗的生存获益,但对II期患者的获益并不显著。一项对11项比较辅助治疗与观察治疗II期癌症患者的试验的荟萃分析显示,辅助治疗的死亡优势比(OR)没有显著降低(OR 0.83;95%置信区间[CI] 0.62 ~ 1.10)。门静脉输注化疗(PVI)患者的死亡OR为0.62 (95% CI 0.35 ~ 1.11)。危害:5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)与左旋咪唑或亚叶酸蛋白或两者同时使用的毒性作用为轻至中度,主要包括口炎、腹泻和骨髓抑制;5%的病人需要住院。在18%的患者中,5-FU加左旋咪唑与短暂性神经毒性作用相关。与PVI相关的毒性作用是轻微的,罕见的,主要包括白细胞减少和腹泻;1%的患者出现肠穿孔。实践指南:辅助治疗目前不推荐用于II期结肠癌切除患者的常规治疗。伴有II期疾病和高危因素(肠梗阻、肿瘤粘连、侵袭、穿孔或非整倍体)的患者预后较差,与III期结肠癌患者类似。对于个体化治疗,这些患者应了解其预后;在向患者解释辅助治疗价值的不确定性后,可以考虑治疗。鼓励在临床试验中招募高风险II期疾病患者。在II期结肠癌中,需要进行辅助治疗与观察治疗的比较试验,并且在伦理上是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Have diagnostic practices contributed to trends in leukemia incidence and mortality among Canadians? An epidemiological review of red cell transfusions in cancer chemotherapy. Staging in cancer. The importance of alternative therapies to the public. Cancer patients' expectations of the role of family physicians in communication about complementary therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1