Critical review of 5 nonpharmacologic strategies for managing cancer pain.

S M Sellick, C Zaza
{"title":"Critical review of 5 nonpharmacologic strategies for managing cancer pain.","authors":"S M Sellick,&nbsp;C Zaza","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Health care professionals at 2 Ontario cancer centres were surveyed to determine their familiarity with, perceptions of and interest in learning more about nonpharmacologic strategies for the management of cancer pain. Evidence-based education sessions were subsequently developed for the 5 strategies in which participants were most interested. This article presents the results of critical literature reviews concerning the effectiveness of the 5 strategies: acupuncture, massage therapy, hypnosis, therapeutic touch and biofeedback.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases MEDLINE (1966 to June 1997), CINAHL (1982 to June 1997) and PsychoINFO Lit (1980 to June 1997) were searched systematically for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the 5 nonpharmacologic strategies. The authors' personal files and reference lists of relevant papers and main texts were also searched. The quality of the trials was reviewed according to established criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 1 RCT of acupuncture, 1 of massage therapy and 6 of hypnosis. The studies of hypnosis suggested that there is much support for its use in the management of cancer pain. The evidence was either lacking or less clear for the other therapies examined.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Because patients use a wide variety of nonpharmacologic strategies regardless of their effectiveness, clinicians need to be familiar with available research and able to discuss those strategies for which the evidence is strong, weak or nonexistent. More research on the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic strategies for pain management is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":79570,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","volume":"2 1","pages":"7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Health care professionals at 2 Ontario cancer centres were surveyed to determine their familiarity with, perceptions of and interest in learning more about nonpharmacologic strategies for the management of cancer pain. Evidence-based education sessions were subsequently developed for the 5 strategies in which participants were most interested. This article presents the results of critical literature reviews concerning the effectiveness of the 5 strategies: acupuncture, massage therapy, hypnosis, therapeutic touch and biofeedback.

Methods: The databases MEDLINE (1966 to June 1997), CINAHL (1982 to June 1997) and PsychoINFO Lit (1980 to June 1997) were searched systematically for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the 5 nonpharmacologic strategies. The authors' personal files and reference lists of relevant papers and main texts were also searched. The quality of the trials was reviewed according to established criteria.

Results: The search yielded 1 RCT of acupuncture, 1 of massage therapy and 6 of hypnosis. The studies of hypnosis suggested that there is much support for its use in the management of cancer pain. The evidence was either lacking or less clear for the other therapies examined.

Conclusion: Because patients use a wide variety of nonpharmacologic strategies regardless of their effectiveness, clinicians need to be familiar with available research and able to discuss those strategies for which the evidence is strong, weak or nonexistent. More research on the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic strategies for pain management is needed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
5种治疗癌性疼痛的非药物策略综述。
目的:对安大略省2个癌症中心的卫生保健专业人员进行调查,以确定他们对癌症疼痛管理的非药物策略的熟悉程度、认知和兴趣。随后针对参与者最感兴趣的5种策略制定了基于证据的教育课程。本文介绍了关于针灸、按摩疗法、催眠、治疗性触摸和生物反馈这5种策略有效性的关键文献综述的结果。方法:系统检索MEDLINE(1966 ~ 1997年6月)、CINAHL(1982 ~ 1997年6月)和PsychoINFO Lit(1980 ~ 1997年6月)数据库,查找5种非药物治疗策略的随机对照试验(rct)。检索作者个人档案及相关论文和主要文本的参考文献列表。根据既定标准对试验的质量进行了审查。结果:检索得到针灸治疗1项、按摩治疗1项、催眠治疗6项。催眠的研究表明,在治疗癌症疼痛方面有很多支持。其他治疗方法的证据要么缺乏,要么不太清楚。结论:由于患者使用各种各样的非药物策略,而不管其有效性如何,临床医生需要熟悉现有的研究,并能够讨论那些证据强、弱或不存在的策略。需要更多的研究非药物策略对疼痛管理的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Have diagnostic practices contributed to trends in leukemia incidence and mortality among Canadians? An epidemiological review of red cell transfusions in cancer chemotherapy. Staging in cancer. The importance of alternative therapies to the public. Cancer patients' expectations of the role of family physicians in communication about complementary therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1