Chemotherapy in stage IV (metastatic) non-small-cell lung cancer. Provincial Lung Disease Site Group.

P G Lopez, D J Stewart, T E Newman, W K Evans
{"title":"Chemotherapy in stage IV (metastatic) non-small-cell lung cancer. Provincial Lung Disease Site Group.","authors":"P G Lopez,&nbsp;D J Stewart,&nbsp;T E Newman,&nbsp;W K Evans","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Guideline question: </strong>In patients with metastatic, stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) does chemotherapy improve survival and quality of life?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To make recommendations about the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Survival and quality of life are the primary endpoints of interest. Specifically, 1-year survival will be considered.</p><p><strong>Perspective: </strong>Evidence was selected and reviewed by 3 medical oncologists and the project coordinator of the Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative. Drafts of this document have been circulated and reviewed by the Provincial Lung Disease Site Group (Lung DSG). The Lung DSG comprises medical and radiation oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, a psychologists and a medical sociologist. There was no consumer participation in the development of this guideline.</p><p><strong>Quality of evidence: </strong>There were 3 meta-analyses available for review, but only 1 is discussed in detail. The largest and most comprehensive meta-analysis is based on 11 randomized controlled trials involving 1190 patients. The main comparisons were chemotherapy plus supportive care versus supportive care alone. The largest trial included in the meta-analysis involved randomization of 188 patients, and the smallest trial involved randomization of 32 patients. Only trials that had accrued patients between Jan. 1, 1965, and Dec. 31, 1991, were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Benefits: </strong>A survival benefit at 1 year was seen for the group of patients treated with chemotherapy (pooled hazard ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.95). Subgroup analyses suggested a benefit for patients receiving chemotherapy regimens containing cisplatin (pooled hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.85; relative risk reduction for death, 27%; absolute improvement in 1 year survival, 10%; 95% CI, 5% to 18%; gain in median survival 1.5 months; 95% CI, 1 to 2.5 months). No benefit for patients treated with chemotherapy was found beyond 1 year. None of the randomized trials successfully measured quality of life using QOL assessment instruments. No firm conclusions can be made about the potential benefits (as measured by quality of life) that chemotherapy has for patients with metastatic NSCLC, as there are no available data from randomized controlled trials. However, several trials have documented relief of cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, cough, hemoptysis or dyspnea in the majority (approximately 70%) of patients.</p><p><strong>Harms: </strong>In a subgroup analysis of trials that used long-term alkylating agents other than cisplatin (an approach no longer used as therapy in NSCLC) as part of the chemotherapy regimen, the meta-analysis demonstrated a detrimental effect of chemotherapy on survival (pooled hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.66, p = 0.09). In general, myelosuppression, sepsis resulting in hospitalization, drug-specific toxicities and death are potential complications of chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":79570,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","volume":"1 1","pages":"18-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guideline question: In patients with metastatic, stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) does chemotherapy improve survival and quality of life?

Objective: To make recommendations about the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC.

Outcomes: Survival and quality of life are the primary endpoints of interest. Specifically, 1-year survival will be considered.

Perspective: Evidence was selected and reviewed by 3 medical oncologists and the project coordinator of the Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative. Drafts of this document have been circulated and reviewed by the Provincial Lung Disease Site Group (Lung DSG). The Lung DSG comprises medical and radiation oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, a psychologists and a medical sociologist. There was no consumer participation in the development of this guideline.

Quality of evidence: There were 3 meta-analyses available for review, but only 1 is discussed in detail. The largest and most comprehensive meta-analysis is based on 11 randomized controlled trials involving 1190 patients. The main comparisons were chemotherapy plus supportive care versus supportive care alone. The largest trial included in the meta-analysis involved randomization of 188 patients, and the smallest trial involved randomization of 32 patients. Only trials that had accrued patients between Jan. 1, 1965, and Dec. 31, 1991, were included in the analysis.

Benefits: A survival benefit at 1 year was seen for the group of patients treated with chemotherapy (pooled hazard ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.95). Subgroup analyses suggested a benefit for patients receiving chemotherapy regimens containing cisplatin (pooled hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.85; relative risk reduction for death, 27%; absolute improvement in 1 year survival, 10%; 95% CI, 5% to 18%; gain in median survival 1.5 months; 95% CI, 1 to 2.5 months). No benefit for patients treated with chemotherapy was found beyond 1 year. None of the randomized trials successfully measured quality of life using QOL assessment instruments. No firm conclusions can be made about the potential benefits (as measured by quality of life) that chemotherapy has for patients with metastatic NSCLC, as there are no available data from randomized controlled trials. However, several trials have documented relief of cancer-related symptoms, such as pain, cough, hemoptysis or dyspnea in the majority (approximately 70%) of patients.

Harms: In a subgroup analysis of trials that used long-term alkylating agents other than cisplatin (an approach no longer used as therapy in NSCLC) as part of the chemotherapy regimen, the meta-analysis demonstrated a detrimental effect of chemotherapy on survival (pooled hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.66, p = 0.09). In general, myelosuppression, sepsis resulting in hospitalization, drug-specific toxicities and death are potential complications of chemotherapy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IV期(转移性)非小细胞肺癌的化疗。省肺病现场组。
指导问题:在转移性IV期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,化疗是否能改善生存和生活质量?目的:探讨化疗在转移性(IV期)非小细胞肺癌治疗中的作用。结果:生存和生活质量是主要的研究终点。具体来说,将考虑1年的生存期。观点:证据由3名肿瘤学家和安大略癌症治疗实践指南倡议的项目协调员选择和审查。本文件的草案已由省肺病现场小组(Lung DSG)分发和审查。肺DSG由医学和放射肿瘤学家、病理学家、外科医生、流行病学家、心理学家和医学社会学家组成。在制定这一准则的过程中没有消费者的参与。证据质量:有3项荟萃分析可供回顾,但只有1项被详细讨论。规模最大、最全面的荟萃分析是基于11项随机对照试验,涉及1190名患者。主要的比较是化疗加支持治疗与单独支持治疗。meta分析中纳入的最大的试验涉及188例患者的随机化,最小的试验涉及32例患者的随机化。只有在1965年1月1日至1991年12月31日期间累积患者的试验才被纳入分析。获益:化疗组患者1年生存获益(合并风险比0.84;95%置信区间[CI], 0.74 ~ 0.95)。亚组分析显示,接受含顺铂化疗方案的患者获益(合并风险比,0.73;95% CI, 0.63 ~ 0.85;死亡相对风险降低27%;1年生存率绝对改善,10%;95% CI, 5% ~ 18%;中位生存期延长1.5个月;95% CI, 1 ~ 2.5个月)。化疗超过1年的患者没有获益。没有一项随机试验成功地使用生活质量评估工具来测量生活质量。化疗对转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的潜在益处(以生活质量衡量)尚无确切的结论,因为没有来自随机对照试验的可用数据。然而,一些试验表明,大多数(约70%)患者的癌症相关症状,如疼痛、咳嗽、咯血或呼吸困难得到缓解。危害:在使用顺铂(一种不再用于非小细胞肺癌治疗的方法)以外的长期烷基化剂作为化疗方案一部分的试验亚组分析中,荟萃分析显示化疗对生存有不利影响(合并风险比,1.26;95% CI, 0.96 ~ 1.66, p = 0.09)。一般来说,骨髓抑制、导致住院的败血症、药物特异性毒性和死亡是化疗的潜在并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Have diagnostic practices contributed to trends in leukemia incidence and mortality among Canadians? An epidemiological review of red cell transfusions in cancer chemotherapy. Staging in cancer. The importance of alternative therapies to the public. Cancer patients' expectations of the role of family physicians in communication about complementary therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1