J Aurich, E Duchayne, F Huguet-Rigal, F Bauduer, M Navarro, Y Perel, J Pris, M R Caballin, N Dastugue
{"title":"Clinical, morphological, cytogenetic and molecular aspects of a series of Ph-negative chronic myeloid leukemias.","authors":"J Aurich, E Duchayne, F Huguet-Rigal, F Bauduer, M Navarro, Y Perel, J Pris, M R Caballin, N Dastugue","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical, morphological, cytogenetic and molecular (fluorescence in situ hybridization and RT-PCR) data were analyzed in twelve Philadelphia negative chronic myeloid leukemias (Ph-negative CMLs). Four patients were classified as BCR-positive. A standard b2a2 or b3a2 transcript was found, and the BCR-ABL hybrid gene was located on the 22q11 band in three cases and on the 1p35 band in one case with a t(1;9)(p35;q34). All were classified as typical chronic granulocytic leukemia (CGL) according to the French-American-British (FAB) morphological guidelines. Responses to therapy were evaluated by FISH in the four patients, and proved to be poorer than in Ph-positive CMLs. Eight BCR-negative patients were identified. They could be characterized by an older age, a less proliferative form of disease than the BCR-positive patients, and a frequent (six out of eight) abnormal karyotype. The FAB classification identified four CGLs and four atypical CMLs (aCML). A normal karyotype was more frequent in the patients classified as CGL whereas all the aCMLs had a chromosomal abnormality. Three patients had chromatin clumping and this morphologic feature was associated with trisomy 8 in two. No correlation between the cytogenetic, morphologic and the clinical data were found. Five patients had poor tolerance to therapy with a frequent occurrence of bone marrow failure and hemorragic syndrome, whereas three patients responded to a standard treatment of CML. Our study reinforces previous data on Ph-negative BCR-positive CMLs and emphasizes the difficulty in correlating clinical, morphologic, cytogenetic data in Ph-negative BCR-negative CMLs. However, our data also argue in favor of the existence of true Ph-negative BCR-negative CMLs and suggest that some of them can respond to a standard treatment of CML.</p>","PeriodicalId":73231,"journal":{"name":"Hematology and cell therapy","volume":"40 4","pages":"149-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology and cell therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clinical, morphological, cytogenetic and molecular (fluorescence in situ hybridization and RT-PCR) data were analyzed in twelve Philadelphia negative chronic myeloid leukemias (Ph-negative CMLs). Four patients were classified as BCR-positive. A standard b2a2 or b3a2 transcript was found, and the BCR-ABL hybrid gene was located on the 22q11 band in three cases and on the 1p35 band in one case with a t(1;9)(p35;q34). All were classified as typical chronic granulocytic leukemia (CGL) according to the French-American-British (FAB) morphological guidelines. Responses to therapy were evaluated by FISH in the four patients, and proved to be poorer than in Ph-positive CMLs. Eight BCR-negative patients were identified. They could be characterized by an older age, a less proliferative form of disease than the BCR-positive patients, and a frequent (six out of eight) abnormal karyotype. The FAB classification identified four CGLs and four atypical CMLs (aCML). A normal karyotype was more frequent in the patients classified as CGL whereas all the aCMLs had a chromosomal abnormality. Three patients had chromatin clumping and this morphologic feature was associated with trisomy 8 in two. No correlation between the cytogenetic, morphologic and the clinical data were found. Five patients had poor tolerance to therapy with a frequent occurrence of bone marrow failure and hemorragic syndrome, whereas three patients responded to a standard treatment of CML. Our study reinforces previous data on Ph-negative BCR-positive CMLs and emphasizes the difficulty in correlating clinical, morphologic, cytogenetic data in Ph-negative BCR-negative CMLs. However, our data also argue in favor of the existence of true Ph-negative BCR-negative CMLs and suggest that some of them can respond to a standard treatment of CML.