Relation of olfactory event-related potentials to changes in stimulus concentration

T Tateyama , T Hummel , S Roscher , H Post , G Kobal
{"title":"Relation of olfactory event-related potentials to changes in stimulus concentration","authors":"T Tateyama ,&nbsp;T Hummel ,&nbsp;S Roscher ,&nbsp;H Post ,&nbsp;G Kobal","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00022-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong>: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of odorant concentration on the olfactory event-related potential (OERP).</p><p><strong>Design and Methods</strong>: OERP were evaluated in 8 men and 8 women (17–34 years of age) in response to 4 concentrations of vanillin (7, 28, 56 and 84% v/v). Sixteen presentations of each concentration (stimulus duration 200 ms, interval 40 s, flow 8 l/min) were applied in a randomized order. EEG recordings were made at 3 midline sites (pos. Fz, Cz, Pz). Amplitudes and latencies of four peaks were measured (latencies in ms at Pz after stimulation with 84% v/v vanillin): P1 (277), N1 (348), P2 (412) and P3 (496). Statistical analysis was performed with MANOVAs (`concentration', `recording site'=within-subject-factors; `age' as covariate).</p><p><strong>Results</strong>: With increasing stimulus concentration amplitudes became significantly larger; this was most pronounced for P3 (P1N1: <em>F</em>=2.90, <em>P</em>&lt;0.05; N1P2: <em>F</em>=5.15, <em>P</em>&lt;0.01; N1P3: <em>F</em>=35.7, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001; P3: <em>F</em>=38.6; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). Correspondingly, latencies shortened with increasing concentrations (P1: <em>F</em>=25.2; N1: 17.51; P2: 14.8; P3: 13.4; all <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). While there was no correlation between OERP amplitudes and butanol odor detection thresholds, latencies were the shorter the lower the subjects' thresholds (coefficients of correlations for peak latencies at Cz for 84% v/v: P1 <em>r</em><sub>15</sub>=minus0.59; N1 <em>r</em><sub>15</sub>=minus0.58; P2 <em>r</em><sub>15</sub>=minus0.55; P3 <em>r</em><sub>15</sub>=minus0.45).</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: The results indicated that both OERP amplitudes and latencies are related to the concentration of olfactory stimuli. They also suggested that latencies exhibit a stronger relation to changes in stimulus intensity compared to OERP amplitudes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"108 5","pages":"Pages 449-455"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00022-7","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559798000227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of odorant concentration on the olfactory event-related potential (OERP).

Design and Methods: OERP were evaluated in 8 men and 8 women (17–34 years of age) in response to 4 concentrations of vanillin (7, 28, 56 and 84% v/v). Sixteen presentations of each concentration (stimulus duration 200 ms, interval 40 s, flow 8 l/min) were applied in a randomized order. EEG recordings were made at 3 midline sites (pos. Fz, Cz, Pz). Amplitudes and latencies of four peaks were measured (latencies in ms at Pz after stimulation with 84% v/v vanillin): P1 (277), N1 (348), P2 (412) and P3 (496). Statistical analysis was performed with MANOVAs (`concentration', `recording site'=within-subject-factors; `age' as covariate).

Results: With increasing stimulus concentration amplitudes became significantly larger; this was most pronounced for P3 (P1N1: F=2.90, P<0.05; N1P2: F=5.15, P<0.01; N1P3: F=35.7, P<0.001; P3: F=38.6; P<0.001). Correspondingly, latencies shortened with increasing concentrations (P1: F=25.2; N1: 17.51; P2: 14.8; P3: 13.4; all P<0.001). While there was no correlation between OERP amplitudes and butanol odor detection thresholds, latencies were the shorter the lower the subjects' thresholds (coefficients of correlations for peak latencies at Cz for 84% v/v: P1 r15=minus0.59; N1 r15=minus0.58; P2 r15=minus0.55; P3 r15=minus0.45).

Conclusions: The results indicated that both OERP amplitudes and latencies are related to the concentration of olfactory stimuli. They also suggested that latencies exhibit a stronger relation to changes in stimulus intensity compared to OERP amplitudes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗅觉事件相关电位与刺激浓度变化的关系
目的:探讨气味浓度对嗅觉事件相关电位(OERP)的影响。设计和方法:对8名男性和8名女性(17-34岁)对4种浓度的香兰素(7、28、56和84% v/v)的反应进行OERP评估。每个浓度16次呈现(刺激持续时间200 ms,间隔40 s,流量8 l/min),按随机顺序进行。在3个中线部位(pos. Fz, Cz, Pz)进行脑电记录。测量了四个峰的振幅和潜伏期(84% v/v香兰素刺激后Pz的潜伏期以ms为单位):P1 (277), N1 (348), P2(412)和P3(496)。采用方差分析进行统计分析(“浓度”,“记录地点”=受试者内因素;“年龄”作为协变量)。结果:随着刺激浓度的增加,振幅明显变大;P3最明显(P1N1: F=2.90, P<0.05;N1P2: F=5.15, P<0.01;N1P3: F=35.7, P<0.001;P3: F = 38.6;术中,0.001)。相应的,潜伏期随着浓度的增加而缩短(P1: F=25.2;N1: 17.51;P2: 14.8;P3: 13.4;所有术;0.001)。虽然OERP振幅与丁醇气味检测阈值之间没有相关性,但潜伏期越短,受试者的阈值越低(Cz处峰值潜伏期的相关系数为84% v/v: P1 r15= - 0.59;N1 r15 = minus0.58;P2 r15 = minus0.55;P3 r15 = minus0.45)。结论:OERP的振幅和潜伏期均与嗅觉刺激浓度有关。他们还认为,与OERP振幅相比,潜伏期与刺激强度的变化有更强的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual Evoked Potentials Clinical Evoked Potentials: An Illustrated Manual Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Motor Evoked Potentials Cochlear implant performance and electrically-evoked auditory brain-stem response characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1