[Augmentation of the neuromuscular blocking effect of mivacurium during inhalation anesthesia with desflurane, sevoflorane and isoflurane in comparison with total intravenous anesthesia].

Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation Pub Date : 1998-01-01
H Wulf, S Hauschild, D Proppe, T Ledowski
{"title":"[Augmentation of the neuromuscular blocking effect of mivacurium during inhalation anesthesia with desflurane, sevoflorane and isoflurane in comparison with total intravenous anesthesia].","authors":"H Wulf,&nbsp;S Hauschild,&nbsp;D Proppe,&nbsp;T Ledowski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the enhancement of mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block by potent inhalational anaesthetic agents, dose-effect curves for mivacurium were determined in 84 patients scheduled for minor elective surgery during anaesthesia with 1.5 MAC (70% N2O) desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane and compared with those under total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA). Acceleromyography (TOF-Guard) and train of four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve were used (2 Hz every 12 s). Mivacurium was administered in increments of 25 micrograms kg-1 until a depression of T1 > 95% was reached. ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.2). The depression of T1 during potent inhalational anaesthesia was enhanced compared with TIVA. The ED50 and ED95 of mivacurium were 27 +/- 11 (SD) and 58 +/- 26 micrograms kg-1 for desflurane; 28 +/- 10 and 64 +/- 23 micrograms kg-1 for sevoflurane; and 27 +/- 13 and 55 +/- 27 micrograms kg-1 for isoflurane and were significantly lower than the 35 +/- 7 and 71 +/- 20 micrograms kg-1 for TIVA. The duration 25% revealed a significant difference between the volatile anaesthetic groups (10 +/- 2, 11 +/- 3, 11 +/- 3 min respectively) and the TIVA control group (8 +/- 3 min). The recovery index 25/75 and TOFO.80 were significantly prolonged by desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane compared with TIVA (RI25/75 9 +/- 4, 9 +/- 4, 10 +/- 5 respectively vs. 5 +/- 2 min; TOFO.80 27 +/- 10, 28 +/- 9, 29 +/- 9 respectively vs. 18 +/- 4 min). We conclude that the neuromuscular blocking effect of mivacurium is enhanced during anaesthesia with desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane compared with TIVA. The duration of action and the recovery time are prolonged. The dose of mivacurium used should be reduced if anaesthesia is maintained with volatile anaesthetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":76993,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","volume":"23 4","pages":"88-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the enhancement of mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block by potent inhalational anaesthetic agents, dose-effect curves for mivacurium were determined in 84 patients scheduled for minor elective surgery during anaesthesia with 1.5 MAC (70% N2O) desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane and compared with those under total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA). Acceleromyography (TOF-Guard) and train of four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve were used (2 Hz every 12 s). Mivacurium was administered in increments of 25 micrograms kg-1 until a depression of T1 > 95% was reached. ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.2). The depression of T1 during potent inhalational anaesthesia was enhanced compared with TIVA. The ED50 and ED95 of mivacurium were 27 +/- 11 (SD) and 58 +/- 26 micrograms kg-1 for desflurane; 28 +/- 10 and 64 +/- 23 micrograms kg-1 for sevoflurane; and 27 +/- 13 and 55 +/- 27 micrograms kg-1 for isoflurane and were significantly lower than the 35 +/- 7 and 71 +/- 20 micrograms kg-1 for TIVA. The duration 25% revealed a significant difference between the volatile anaesthetic groups (10 +/- 2, 11 +/- 3, 11 +/- 3 min respectively) and the TIVA control group (8 +/- 3 min). The recovery index 25/75 and TOFO.80 were significantly prolonged by desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane compared with TIVA (RI25/75 9 +/- 4, 9 +/- 4, 10 +/- 5 respectively vs. 5 +/- 2 min; TOFO.80 27 +/- 10, 28 +/- 9, 29 +/- 9 respectively vs. 18 +/- 4 min). We conclude that the neuromuscular blocking effect of mivacurium is enhanced during anaesthesia with desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane compared with TIVA. The duration of action and the recovery time are prolonged. The dose of mivacurium used should be reduced if anaesthesia is maintained with volatile anaesthetics.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[地氟醚、七氟醚和异氟醚对吸入麻醉时米维库林神经肌肉阻滞作用的增强与全静脉麻醉的比较]。
为了评价强效吸入麻醉剂对微真空诱导的神经肌肉阻滞的增强作用,我们测定了84例小选择性手术患者在1.5 MAC (70% N2O)地氟烷、七氟烷和异氟烷麻醉期间使用微真空的剂量效应曲线,并与全静脉麻醉(TIVA)的患者进行了比较。使用加速肌图(TOF- guard)和四次训练(TOF)刺激尺神经(2hz / 12s)。Mivacurium以25微克kg-1的增量给药,直到T1下降> 95%。采用方差分析进行统计分析(α = 0.05, β = 0.2)。与TIVA相比,强效吸入麻醉时T1的抑制增强。地氟醚的ED50和ED95分别为27 +/- 11 (SD)和58 +/- 26微克kg-1;七氟醚为28 +/- 10和64 +/- 23微克kg-1;异氟醚为27 +/- 13和55 +/- 27微克kg-1,显著低于TIVA的35 +/- 7和71 +/- 20微克kg-1。挥发性麻醉组(分别为10 +/- 2、11 +/- 3、11 +/- 3 min)与TIVA对照组(8 +/- 3 min)的持续时间为25%,差异有统计学意义。地氟醚、七氟醚和异氟醚与TIVA相比,恢复指数25/75和TOFO.80均显著延长(RI25/75分别为9 +/- 4,9 +/- 4,10 +/- 5比5 +/- 2 min;TOFO.80分别为27 +/- 10,28 +/- 9,29 +/- 9 vs. 18 +/- 4分钟)。我们的结论是,与TIVA相比,地氟醚、异氟醚和七氟醚麻醉时,mivacurium的神经肌肉阻断作用增强。作用时间和恢复时间延长。如果使用挥发性麻醉剂维持麻醉,则应减少使用微真空的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Regional anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia--pathophysiology and clinical implications]. [Analgesia, sedation and anaesthesia in emergency service]. [The influence of normobaric hyperoxia on hepatic oxygenation--experience with an animal model]. [Perioperative management of a patient with alcaptonuria--a case report]. [Implantable drug pumps for spinal opioid analgesia: technical solutions and problems].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1