Contraceptive choices among Nigerian women attending an antenatal clinic.

J I Adinma, A O Agbai, B O Nwosu
{"title":"Contraceptive choices among Nigerian women attending an antenatal clinic.","authors":"J I Adinma,&nbsp;A O Agbai,&nbsp;B O Nwosu","doi":"10.1023/a:1006590717562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The factors determining the choice of contraception were studied among 230 pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic at Nnewi, Nigeria. There were 174 (52.1%) choices for the natural methods of contraception, 86 (25.7%) for the traditional methods, and 74 (22.2%) for the artificial methods. The most commonly chosen contraceptive methods were rhythm, 95 (28.4%) and Billings, 79 (23.5%), while the least was surgical contraception, 4 (1.2%). The barrier method was not chosen at all. The most common reason given for choice of contraception was safety, 28.7%, followed by dislike of artificial methods, 25.2%; the no-response rate was 29.1%. Other reasons given were ease of use, 10%; husband's decision, 1.3%; fear of the complications of the artificial methods, 13%; dislike of foreign body, 2.6%; the method most understood, 24.8%; need for further counselling, 7%; and long-lasting, 2.6%. The most common reason given against the use of the artificial methods of contraception was fear of its complications, 31.9%, followed by preference for the natural methods, 22.3%. Condom use decreased with increasing age, being highest at 16-20 years, 37.5%, and lowest at 31-35 years, 5.9%. When compared with other parity groups, the grandmultipara group (> or = 5) used the IUD, 14.3%; injectable contraception, 4.8%; and other traditional methods (breastfeeding and abstinence), 28.5%, and did not use the rhythm method. Women of the lowest social class most commonly chose other traditional methods, 57.1%, and never chose the Billings method. Women who desired 1 to 3 children most commonly chose the pill, 23.5%, or withdrawal method, 23.5%, while women who desired 4 to 10 children most commonly chose the rhythm and Billings methods. There was no difference in choice of method of contraception for the various religious denominations, although the artificial methods were less commonly chosen by Catholics, 14.1%, compared with Anglicans, 33%, and other Christian denominations, 33.3%. The physician was the most common source of information for the choosers of the condom, 18.9%; surgical contraception, 2.7%; and the pill, 8.1%; the nurse for injectable contraception, 4.9%, while the commonest source of information among choosers of the rhythm method was the electronic media, 40.5%; print media, 34.9%; and peer group, 34.4%. Lecture/sex instruction was the commonest source of information among choosers of the Billings, 35.5%, and withdrawal, 22.6%, methods, while the no-response rate on source of information on contraception was highest among choosers of the Billings method. There is a need to bridge the gap in contraceptive information by redirecting counselling strategies and restructuring family planning programs to dispel negative perceptions and encourage informed choice of effective family planning methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":76977,"journal":{"name":"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception","volume":"14 2","pages":"131-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006590717562","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006590717562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

The factors determining the choice of contraception were studied among 230 pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic at Nnewi, Nigeria. There were 174 (52.1%) choices for the natural methods of contraception, 86 (25.7%) for the traditional methods, and 74 (22.2%) for the artificial methods. The most commonly chosen contraceptive methods were rhythm, 95 (28.4%) and Billings, 79 (23.5%), while the least was surgical contraception, 4 (1.2%). The barrier method was not chosen at all. The most common reason given for choice of contraception was safety, 28.7%, followed by dislike of artificial methods, 25.2%; the no-response rate was 29.1%. Other reasons given were ease of use, 10%; husband's decision, 1.3%; fear of the complications of the artificial methods, 13%; dislike of foreign body, 2.6%; the method most understood, 24.8%; need for further counselling, 7%; and long-lasting, 2.6%. The most common reason given against the use of the artificial methods of contraception was fear of its complications, 31.9%, followed by preference for the natural methods, 22.3%. Condom use decreased with increasing age, being highest at 16-20 years, 37.5%, and lowest at 31-35 years, 5.9%. When compared with other parity groups, the grandmultipara group (> or = 5) used the IUD, 14.3%; injectable contraception, 4.8%; and other traditional methods (breastfeeding and abstinence), 28.5%, and did not use the rhythm method. Women of the lowest social class most commonly chose other traditional methods, 57.1%, and never chose the Billings method. Women who desired 1 to 3 children most commonly chose the pill, 23.5%, or withdrawal method, 23.5%, while women who desired 4 to 10 children most commonly chose the rhythm and Billings methods. There was no difference in choice of method of contraception for the various religious denominations, although the artificial methods were less commonly chosen by Catholics, 14.1%, compared with Anglicans, 33%, and other Christian denominations, 33.3%. The physician was the most common source of information for the choosers of the condom, 18.9%; surgical contraception, 2.7%; and the pill, 8.1%; the nurse for injectable contraception, 4.9%, while the commonest source of information among choosers of the rhythm method was the electronic media, 40.5%; print media, 34.9%; and peer group, 34.4%. Lecture/sex instruction was the commonest source of information among choosers of the Billings, 35.5%, and withdrawal, 22.6%, methods, while the no-response rate on source of information on contraception was highest among choosers of the Billings method. There is a need to bridge the gap in contraceptive information by redirecting counselling strategies and restructuring family planning programs to dispel negative perceptions and encourage informed choice of effective family planning methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参加产前诊所的尼日利亚妇女的避孕选择。
在尼日利亚Nnewi产前诊所的230名孕妇中,研究了决定避孕选择的因素。选择自然避孕方法的有174种(52.1%),选择传统避孕方法的有86种(25.7%),选择人工避孕方法的有74种(22.2%)。选择节育方法最多的是节育95例(28.4%)和比林斯79例(23.5%),选择手术避孕方法最少的为4例(1.2%)。没有选择势垒法。选择避孕最常见的原因是安全(28.7%),其次是不喜欢人工方法(25.2%);无应答率为29.1%。其他原因还包括:使用方便,占10%;丈夫的决定,1.3%;对人工方法并发症的恐惧,13%;不喜欢异物,2.6%;方法理解度最高,占24.8%;需要进一步咨询,7%;持久的,2.6%。反对使用人工避孕方法的最常见原因是担心并发症(31.9%),其次是喜欢自然避孕方法(22.3%)。安全套使用率随年龄增长而下降,16-20岁最高,占37.5%,31-35岁最低,占5.9%。与其他胎次组比较,大多段组(>或= 5)使用宫内节育器,14.3%;注射避孕,4.8%;而其他传统方法(母乳喂养和禁欲),占28.5%,且未采用节律法。社会阶层最低的女性最常选择其他传统方法,占57.1%,从不选择比林斯方法。想要1到3个孩子的女性通常选择避孕药(23.5%)或戒断法(23.5%),而想要4到10个孩子的女性通常选择节律法和比林斯法。不同宗教派别在选择避孕方法上没有差异,但选择人工避孕方法的天主教徒较少,为14.1%,英国国教为33%,其他基督教派别为33.3%。医生是选择避孕套的人最常见的信息来源(18.9%);手术避孕,2.7%;避孕药占8.1%;注射避孕护士占4.9%,选择节律法最常见的信息来源是电子媒体,占40.5%;平面媒体占34.9%;同龄群体占34.4%。讲座/性教育是最常见的信息来源(35.5%),退出(22.6%)是最常见的信息来源,而避孕信息来源的无应答率在选择比林斯方法的人群中最高。有必要通过调整咨询战略和调整计划生育方案来弥合避孕信息方面的差距,消除负面看法,鼓励在知情的情况下选择有效的计划生育方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nota editorial Workshop papers Free communications 1 Free communications 2 Free communications 3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1