Creative, paranormal, and delusional thought: a consequence of right hemisphere semantic activation?

D Leonhard, P Brugger
{"title":"Creative, paranormal, and delusional thought: a consequence of right hemisphere semantic activation?","authors":"D Leonhard,&nbsp;P Brugger","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a rapidly growing body of evidence for an association between schizophrenic syndromes and the absence of a clear pattern of hemispheric dominance for language. Independent work with healthy subjects suggests that one feature of right hemispheric (RH) linguistic processing is a coarse as opposed to a focused semantic activation. We provide a comprehensive review of the literature to these hitherto unrelated fields of research and present an experiment assessing functional hemispheric asymmetries for language processing in healthy volunteers, differing in the susceptibility to schizophrenia-like experiences and thoughts.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Forty right-handed men were administered a lateralized tachistoscopic lexical decision task. They also completed the Magical Ideation (MI) scale, which examines a variety of paranormal experiences and beliefs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the 20 subjects with MI scores below the median displayed the expected right visual field/left hemisphere (RVF/LH) superiority in lexical decision accuracy, the 20 high scorers were equally proficient in both visual fields. Compared to the low scorers, they made significantly more correct decisions in the left visual field/right hemisphere (LVF/RH).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results corroborate previous findings of a reduced LH language dominance for subjects scoring high on scales measuring proneness to schizophrenic behavior and thought (\"schizotypy\"). We propose that this dominance failure, which is commonly observed in patients with acute signs of psychosis, facilitates the emergence of paranormal and delusional ideas by way of RH associative processing characteristics, that is, coarse rather than focused semantic activation. As unfocused semantic processing is also characteristic of creative thinking, the use of the RH semantic system may constitute a selective evolutionary advantage allowing the genes predisposing to schizophrenia to proliferate despite the obvious disadvantages of this devastating disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":79516,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","volume":"11 4","pages":"177-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is a rapidly growing body of evidence for an association between schizophrenic syndromes and the absence of a clear pattern of hemispheric dominance for language. Independent work with healthy subjects suggests that one feature of right hemispheric (RH) linguistic processing is a coarse as opposed to a focused semantic activation. We provide a comprehensive review of the literature to these hitherto unrelated fields of research and present an experiment assessing functional hemispheric asymmetries for language processing in healthy volunteers, differing in the susceptibility to schizophrenia-like experiences and thoughts.

Background: Forty right-handed men were administered a lateralized tachistoscopic lexical decision task. They also completed the Magical Ideation (MI) scale, which examines a variety of paranormal experiences and beliefs.

Results: Although the 20 subjects with MI scores below the median displayed the expected right visual field/left hemisphere (RVF/LH) superiority in lexical decision accuracy, the 20 high scorers were equally proficient in both visual fields. Compared to the low scorers, they made significantly more correct decisions in the left visual field/right hemisphere (LVF/RH).

Conclusions: These results corroborate previous findings of a reduced LH language dominance for subjects scoring high on scales measuring proneness to schizophrenic behavior and thought ("schizotypy"). We propose that this dominance failure, which is commonly observed in patients with acute signs of psychosis, facilitates the emergence of paranormal and delusional ideas by way of RH associative processing characteristics, that is, coarse rather than focused semantic activation. As unfocused semantic processing is also characteristic of creative thinking, the use of the RH semantic system may constitute a selective evolutionary advantage allowing the genes predisposing to schizophrenia to proliferate despite the obvious disadvantages of this devastating disease.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创造性、超自然和妄想思维:右半球语义激活的结果?
目的:越来越多的证据表明,精神分裂症综合征与缺乏明确的语言半球主导模式之间存在关联。对健康受试者的独立研究表明,右半球(RH)语言处理的一个特征是粗糙的,而不是集中的语义激活。我们对这些迄今为止不相关的研究领域的文献进行了全面的回顾,并提出了一项实验,评估健康志愿者在对精神分裂症样经历和思想的易感性方面的半球功能不对称。研究背景:40名右撇子男性被执行了一项偏侧触觉镜词汇决策任务。他们还完成了魔法意念(MI)量表,该量表考察了各种超自然的经历和信仰。结果:虽然20名MI得分低于中位数的被试在词汇决策准确度上表现出预期的右视野/左半球(RVF/LH)优势,但20名高分者在两个视野上都同样精通。与得分低的人相比,他们在左视野/右半球(LVF/RH)上做出的正确决定明显更多。结论:这些结果证实了先前的研究结果,即在测量精神分裂症行为和思维倾向(“精神分裂症”)的量表上得分较高的受试者,其LH语言优势降低。我们认为,这种优势失败通常在急性精神病患者中观察到,通过RH联想加工特征,即粗糙而不是集中的语义激活,促进了超自然和妄想想法的出现。由于不集中的语义加工也是创造性思维的特征,RH语义系统的使用可能构成了一种选择性进化优势,使易患精神分裂症的基因得以增殖,尽管这种毁灭性疾病有明显的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reorientation of attention in Huntington disease. A multivariate classification study of attentional orienting in patients with right hemisphere lesions. Hypersexuality after pallidal surgery in Parkinson disease. Misdiagnosis of schizophrenia in a patient with psychotic symptoms. Cerebral blood flow changes in depressed patients after treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: evidence of individual variability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1